domain aucti0ns.com

[maz]

aucti0ns.com
Auctions with a zero instead of a o

 

[MCDomains]

regfee, IMO

Who would ever type that? It would be hard to brand & market.

 

[barefoottech]

What is the rationale for that name
I can see only one,if you already had auctions.com and you wished too prevent someone mis-representing Aucti0ns.com as your name
Type-ins? no way
It is not a likely Typo
NOT Search Engine Friendly
Value is $0 unless you owned Auctions.com (U don't do you)

 

[sufi]

These kind of names aren't worth even their reg fee so Below reg fee for aucti0ns.com

 

[ownthisdomainnow]

I have owned several of these "zero" typos. They are the most legitimate form of typo because they are the only ones that even resemble the actual word.

Reg fee makes me laugh. I am guessing that no one who says reg fee has ever dealt in "zero" typos. This is not an attack, just an opinion. The users who took the time to post are usually very dependable.

I have never sold one for reg fee or less... that is not just my humble opinion... it is fact.

Your name is somewhere between low $$ to low $$$. If you can't find a buyer - I would give you a little more than reg fee.. (my guess is that these other posters would also.)

Thanks for reading, David

 

[Keynes]

It all depends on the type-in traffic, period. Asking someone to evalute this name a priori is almost impossible.

 

[Tippy]

I agree with above, value is in the traffic only... and I for one have never striked the 0 key instead of the o key. A better typo is a reverse letter to me, those I make on a dialy basis

 

[fonzie_007]

regfee to mid $xx, depending on traffic

 

[FanCube]

0$... depending on the traffic can the price raise a bit.

 

[ownthisdomainnow]

Not to be argumentative, but it seems like people are over-looking the fact that this is a legitimate mistype, and that these kind of domains do sell.. mainly .coms. again I ask... how many of the people saying $0 - reg fee have ever tried to sell a zero typo?

Respectfully, David

 

[floatingworld]

I see this type of domain as less of a mis-type, seeking traffic, than as a look-alike eg s3x.com compared to sex.com. I think that where there is some amusement value than the name is worth going for, but in this case I am not so sure.