sales Artificial.vc Sold For $95,000

[silentg]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2042358096463266161

 

[Mkt Sales Leads]

Meanwhile PDF.vc sells for only 2.5k:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2054668274948792410

 

[Kyle Tully]

Meanwhile PDF.vc sells for only 2.5k:

They are very different quality of name especially when considering the extension.

 

[Mkt Sales Leads]

They are very different quality of name especially when considering the extension.

'Artificial' is not a good brand name. It's almost inherently negative.

PDF is a positive-neutral term (albeit more narrowly focused).

 

[Jannes]

"We named ourselves Artificial because the most important research and development of the next century will be artificial in origin. The name is the thesis."

artificial.vc (developed)

 

[URL Stream]

'Artificial' is not a good brand name. It's almost inherently negative.

PDF is a positive-neutral term (albeit more narrowly focused).

OpenCorporates: 6,795 companies containing “artificial” vs. 1,505 containing “pdf”.

 

[Mkt Sales Leads]

OpenCorporates: 6,795 companies containing “artificial” vs. 1,505 containing “pdf”.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2024145448663982280

@Josh R

 

[Jannes]

Follow the data, not some domain "gurus".

$5k for a measly Slovenian ccTLD (yeah yeah Superintelligence and all that)

(disclaimer: I hold the .fi, so I'm freaking biased )

 

[Mkt Sales Leads]

Follow the data, not some domain "gurus".

Interestingly, Josh is a big advocate of following the data/being data-driven.

 

[NickB]

How many venture capital firms heavily invest in PDF start ups? How many are worthy of VC funding?...

It's like comparing a holey, mouldy sock with a jetpack......