QUAD DOMAINS
Established Member
- Impact
- 502
Before we get started, it’s only right you, the reader, be informed everything in this thread is human perspective. The bot is sitting on the sidelines for this one folks. Because the ChatGPT.com UDRP and GPT domains in general are being covered here, the human perspective disclaimer seems more than appropriate. (Be-bop-beep.)
Informed or uninformed, most of us have at least a base-layer opinion about the future of GPT technology and GPT domain names. Some folks in the domain community believe GPT is a “fad”; while others believe we’ve yet to witness the explosive takeoff it’ll have. Regardless of either, quite a few GPT domains have been registered, and sold, thus far.
On the eve of what appears to be a UDRP case related to ChatGPT.com, there are domainers already denouncing the idea registering GPT names was a good investment move. Some have even speculated OpenAi’s pending trademark will hurt the market for GPT domain name sales. We’d beg to differ because of one word though: chat.
Contrary to certain opinions, we have a hunch the ChatGPT.com UDRP is going to help propel GPT domain name relevance, and thus value, much higher. Especially for the domains that use acronyms and/or first-words relative to chat. Think along the lines of speak, advice, talk, call, teach, lol, atm etc. This is due to what we’d refer to as a “synonym caveat”.
Most of us know the ChatGPT.com UDRP outcome is a toss-up that’s to be determined. After all, human interpretation can end up being the most damning part of the proceedings due to those presiding being…..well human. This isn’t to discount their role. It’s merely to say “generic words”, “trademarks” and “bot-use” can get “tricky”.
Regardless of the UDRP outcome, GPT is becoming a mainstream way for the general public to acknowledge AI that learns and provides answers/results upon request. Dare we say GPT will make the dictionary’s new words list. (Move over NFT.) Because of this, domains that pair common words with GPT will find themselves serving as marketing tools etc.
For the record, GPT domain relevance isn’t totally pegged to the technology itself. It’s also pegged to individuals and businesses seeking ways to convey their brand or endeavor is “tech-modern”. There’s no way to get around the fact we’re at a point in the digital era where tech-centric brands tend to resonate with consumers more.
We’ll conclude by saying GPT domains are here to stay. The ChatGPT.com situation will ultimately test the UDRP process; and there will always be comparable GPT domains in use whether the case itself is a win, lose or draw. This thread should age rather well; and we’re not saying this just because we have skin, or metal, in the game.
Thanks for reading. We invite you to share your thoughts.
🗣 Mel
QUAD Domains
Informed or uninformed, most of us have at least a base-layer opinion about the future of GPT technology and GPT domain names. Some folks in the domain community believe GPT is a “fad”; while others believe we’ve yet to witness the explosive takeoff it’ll have. Regardless of either, quite a few GPT domains have been registered, and sold, thus far.
On the eve of what appears to be a UDRP case related to ChatGPT.com, there are domainers already denouncing the idea registering GPT names was a good investment move. Some have even speculated OpenAi’s pending trademark will hurt the market for GPT domain name sales. We’d beg to differ because of one word though: chat.
Contrary to certain opinions, we have a hunch the ChatGPT.com UDRP is going to help propel GPT domain name relevance, and thus value, much higher. Especially for the domains that use acronyms and/or first-words relative to chat. Think along the lines of speak, advice, talk, call, teach, lol, atm etc. This is due to what we’d refer to as a “synonym caveat”.
Most of us know the ChatGPT.com UDRP outcome is a toss-up that’s to be determined. After all, human interpretation can end up being the most damning part of the proceedings due to those presiding being…..well human. This isn’t to discount their role. It’s merely to say “generic words”, “trademarks” and “bot-use” can get “tricky”.
Regardless of the UDRP outcome, GPT is becoming a mainstream way for the general public to acknowledge AI that learns and provides answers/results upon request. Dare we say GPT will make the dictionary’s new words list. (Move over NFT.) Because of this, domains that pair common words with GPT will find themselves serving as marketing tools etc.
For the record, GPT domain relevance isn’t totally pegged to the technology itself. It’s also pegged to individuals and businesses seeking ways to convey their brand or endeavor is “tech-modern”. There’s no way to get around the fact we’re at a point in the digital era where tech-centric brands tend to resonate with consumers more.
We’ll conclude by saying GPT domains are here to stay. The ChatGPT.com situation will ultimately test the UDRP process; and there will always be comparable GPT domains in use whether the case itself is a win, lose or draw. This thread should age rather well; and we’re not saying this just because we have skin, or metal, in the game.
Thanks for reading. We invite you to share your thoughts.
🗣 Mel
QUAD Domains