Dynadot

discuss Will they Ever be a 9-Figure Domain Sale?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

dande

Premium DomainsTop Member
Impact
1,981
We all have seen countless of 5-figures, 6-figures, 7-figures, and 8-figures domain sales happening in this industry on regular basis. In fact, Escrow.com recently disclosed that they do close two 8-figure domain deals every week, and at least one 7-figure everyday. But none have seen nor heard of a 9-figure sale.

Do you think they will ever be (at least one) 9 figure sale and what would that name be? Which domain investor/company do you think may likely be the first seller? Let's have your opinions.
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
That will never happen. It's been a long time. If they wanted to buy Nissan.com, they would have done it already. They just want to pay courts and lawyers. To buy Nissan.com is losing face in their mind.
I just hoped and still hope for the sake of hope sir !!
 
0
•••
rent.com, hotmail.com sold for 400+ million each many years ago. But they are not domain only sales.
Cloud.com sold for 200+ million 5+ years ago. Probably it is also not a domain only sale.
Youtube.com sold for 1+ Billion.
Yahoo.com may be sold for 30 Billion.
 
1
•••
I realize the Rosener Equation was proposed some years ago (2011 I think) but would be interesting to find a situation using that way to evaluate a domain worth that justified a 9 figure sum.

Or alternatively using some other metric of domain worth. That is what name would be worth 9 figures, and how would you justify the price to a corporate board.

Bob

Very old. None of those domains worth anything near that any more. Runningshoes.com 700k??, top buyer has lost $600k! What idiot he is!
 
Last edited:
0
•••
That is a sound policy. Not to mention, reported sales from marketplaces, do not take into account "sales" that were cancelled. That's what I read here on NP anyway.

Domain sales history sites are sort of like appraisals (although not quite). Use them as a gauge, but not as "gospel".

But still, would love to see that source of the Escrow.com statement.
See the DomainSharpa video their panels talked about it - https://www.domainsherpa.com/20190325/
It's interesting you guys brought up sales reporting sites as a value variable. There was an evaluation on a .org today that addressed the reliability of depending on sales history data alone, for any extension.
Many times, resellers/hobbyists follow a trend in sales data rather than following a trend in asset developments. This can lead to some false positives, making it appear that their is value in a single variable that was influenced by the wrong trending focus and leading to a bad investment that looked good on the surface because so many other investors were buying them, inflating sales data and giving the appearance of end-user demand, when it was actually hyped reseller demand. Big difference.
Source - VIP/Gold Only

There were some other interesting comments by insiders as well. Even @Michael from NameBio chimed in on that one.
The trick here would be to look for dictionary .org ending in "er" to find ones that are closer comps, dictionary is too broad by itself and you should also match the part of speech or tense.
Source - VIP/Gold Only
 
0
•••
Will there Ever be a 9-Figure Domain Sale?
🚩

Yes, I believe so.

This sale will be a very high sale.
Maybe it will even be a higher sale than a 9-figure - sale.
However, I believe it will be the highest sale because I have reasons to believe that...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
rent.com, hotmail.com sold for 400+ million each many years ago. But they are not domain only sales.
Cloud.com sold for 200+ million 5+ years ago. Probably it is also not a domain only sale.
Youtube.com sold for 1+ Billion.
Yahoo.com may be sold for 30 Billion.
Those are business sales. We are talking about domain only sales. I have the feelings that a 9-figure sale may have happened privately without anyone aware of it.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back