FREE Landers: Open · Help: Public or Private

Best posts by Kuli

All Threads Replies

The .PRO Discussion

It wasn't my intension to flatter myself, nor to praise my domains. In fact, I don't understand your comment. Adrian wondered why ship.pro is scored so low, and I gave another example. What's wrong with this?
- Points: 1
- Post #747
- Dec 15, 2008
- Section: gTLD Discussion
The .PRO Discussion

I won't give too much on the Domainscore ranking. Let's just do a quick test: null.pro (which is still available): score 480 compared with two from my portfolio: russia.pro: 484 (just 4 more?) developer.pro: 404 ?!? Looks like 404 - Not found! :bingo: I think this says all.
- Points: 1
- Post #745
- Dec 15, 2008
- Section: gTLD Discussion
What new gTLD domains have you registered?

de.plus de.zone I'm pretty sure these weren't available last year. Some people seem to drop their domains already.
- Points: 0
- Post #2,513
- Jun 16, 2016
- Section: gTLD Discussion
question .de ccTLD question

No, I expected an end user to simply use URLs as they are. And that works with the current IDN. If the ß in zuckersüß is treated as a replacement for ss, or as an own special character, is of no interest as long as the client program (most often the browser) handles it correctly. What it usually...
- Points: 0
- Post #17
- Apr 28, 2016
- Section: ccTLD Discussion
question .de ccTLD question

The end users usually don't care about puny code, they'll just the domains as they are.
- Points: 0
- Post #14
- Apr 27, 2016
- Section: ccTLD Discussion
news United.Domains now forwards to united-domains.de

United domains always had the .de domain. People are used to it, it's part of the brand. Now they have united.domains. What should they do? 1. Resolving both domains top the same website -> duplicate content, bad for search engines 2. Forwarding the .de domain to the new one -> People would be...
- Points: 0
- Post #3
- Nov 23, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
new gtlds The new city and geo gTLDs - A fiasco?

I wouldn't say that those domains would perform bad. You have to compare the size of the market. Most of that geo domains are for markets with less than, say, Denmark has inhabitants. How many .DK domains have you sold? Is .dk performing well? Yes it is, but of course, Denmark has a population...
- Points: 0
- Post #7
- Nov 16, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
showcase Dot Online Showcase

Why do you post domains that aren't even registered?
- Points: 0
- Post #225
- Sep 22, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
showcase Dot Online Showcase

But you know that .io is not a new TLD? It's a ccTLD, and it's live and widely used for many years. You can't compare this with newly introduced nTLDs that jave just started.
- Points: 0
- Post #204
- Sep 16, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
discuss factory.cc is this domain is value ?

No, this was a scam, only 200,000 $ were paid in cash, and it was only done to promote .cc domains. In fact, the buyer was part of the .cc registry. I would say, factory.cc is worthless.
- Points: 0
- Post #2
- Sep 16, 2015
- Section: ccTLD Discussion
The .PRO Discussion

Personally I would say yes, I have lots of those myself. But the sales history speaks a different language. As long as it's not one of the top developed countries like France, Germany or USA, there are no requests. Just got a Sedo bid on iran.pro in mid XXX range, but the buyer didn't even...
- Points: 0
- Post #4,890
- Sep 1, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
Are domain hacks valuable?

Where the first entry asks whether it's a domain hack, and suggests that it could be one. No, Wikipedia. In the first sentence. You already quoted it. Whatever, I don't want to be pedantic. Of course, it doesn't matter in the end. And since there's no official authority that defines what a...
- Points: 0
- Post #15
- Aug 24, 2015
- Section: ccTLD Discussion
Are domain hacks valuable?

That's not a domain hack.
- Points: 0
- Post #6
- Aug 21, 2015
- Section: ccTLD Discussion
advice dot pw

It's only shit. It has no meaning, it's coming way too late, and it's too expensive.
- Points: 0
- Post #2
- Jul 26, 2015
- Section: ccTLD Discussion
Your .PLUS domains

It was their decision not to decide anymore, but to let the market decide. It's a pure financial decision. As long as the registry is paying for it, it can get their name. At the end, it's the free market; in a supermarket, you can buy five different sorts of sugar, but in the end, it's always...
- Points: 0
- Post #47
- Jul 21, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
Your .PLUS domains

That's hard to tell, but I think .web, .shop and .sex will be hot candidates. Don't know about release dates, I don't think it's already set. Better be patient and wait for the bedt chances.
- Points: 0
- Post #43
- Jul 20, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
Your .PLUS domains

I like you.plus. I checked this myself but just didn't take it because I already have enough.
- Points: 0
- Post #33
- Jul 18, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
guide .NET or .CO and other gtld's

.co and.io are ccTLDs, not gTLDs. You are in the wrong forum to ask for them. Regardless of that, Brad has already said all about it. If the .net is available, you don't even have to think about it anymore.
- Points: 0
- Post #4
- Jul 18, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
Your .PLUS domains

Yes, they were available today, so I regged them. For those who are interested: I was tempted to register these two as well, but didn't do because they're not in my domain, and I don't want to invest too much. law.plus tennis.plus is still available (just checked).
- Points: 0
- Post #21
- Jul 13, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion
Your .PLUS domains

Yes, I pre-registered them through United Domains. Those were the only two domains I tried, but I've used them before with mixed results. Which is still good because I'm rather picky with my choices. UD is not the cheapest, but absolutely fair, and they have a good quote at pre-registrations...
- Points: 0
- Post #6
- Jul 9, 2015
- Section: gTLD Discussion