Epik Wikipedia battle is full-on right now

[Rob Monster]

@Intelliname has engaged the battle with the Wikipedia handlers who have been camping on a Wikipedia article about Epik that is full of nonsense narrative.

You can follow the debate here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Intelliname#April_2020

Bring popcorn but do it quick because they will probably censor this too.

Take lots of screenshots.

Here's a start:

 

[Rob Monster]

Actually to be fair to JB, I was the one who asked him why he changed his GD vote and he gave the same answer like he did now.

It seems to me that JB changed his vote when he knew that GD had no chance. Despite ballot stuffing in favor of Dynadot, Epik still prevailed. Todd Han was gracious about the outcome, so all props to those guys.

Things are turning hot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:...roposal_to_change_the_lead_paragraph_for_Epik

Someone named XXX just dropped a megaton:

I am happy to hear you have found them useful! But Wikipedia is encyclopedia, we do not publish happy customer testimonials. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


@GorillaWarfare We do not publish happy customer testimonials here? Are you really having fun with the hardships of others? Every thread related to Epik represents a level of smug arrogance that is unprecedented. Where are all of the other Wikipedia assistants who should be protecting their own platform here? It has some great people. Where are you? I cannot fathom the degree of separations it would take to become a silent bystander in the face of such blatant abuse.

The bias here is absolutely unreal. You can count on it being exposed. In fact, I would say that you are opening a legal hole up for Wikipedia its nonprofit foundation that just goes beyond any rational level of sense. This degree and level of mishandling is exactly what leads to new precedents being set. My thinking is that you may already know this, because no other possible explanation in light of the manipulation of facts, or the degree by which you are acting as a petty gatekeeper, makes sense.

Clearly a small group of people with an agenda are treating this entire fiasco like their own personal project, with zero interest in truth or real discovery. Even your answers are mostly petty, and almost always used for misdirection to guide discussion points from the core issue. It is also the same bad actors every time! Guarding this data like their very jobs depend on it. This goes beyond just an unhealthy obsession with one company. They have selectively and intentionally portrayed Epik through the corrupt lens of their own political intolerance. Whether right or wrong. They already know that most of the articles they collected and used for reference material were written over a handful of days, all by individuals connected to the founders of Media Matters and other content creation groups, as well as the lobbyist and legal influence directions from Michael Edison Hayden earlier in the year. This is a decentralization issue being fought in the open, with those who would crush competitors to maintain their hookers, yachts, orgy islands and special benefits to keep them intact. The real citations that need to come out, are the ones connecting the dots on the respective threads that @GorillaWarfare and others tailored and crafted together to create this attack sequence.

One only needs to see her direct level of participation, as well as the completely unhealthy and manic level of obsession she has in protecting this article, to see that she is not administratively fit to serve in any duty calling for such. I will say it again, because the administrators seem to pick out the singular lines and focus on them believing they are involved in a debate they are in control of. “One only needs to see her direct level of participation, as well as the completely unhealthy and manic level of obsession she has in protecting this article, to see that she is not administratively fit to serve in any duty calling for such.” This is real truth.

She is compromised beyond every sense of the word and definition. This is one of the most singular unreasonable situations and examples of abuse I have witnessed for Wikipedia, and I have never seen a degree of personal ownership and outright vindictiveness that he/she displays. Even last night, I witnessed as it (@GorillaWarfare) literally took to Twitter, as a representative for Wikipedia, and literally taunted the CEO of a company through social media, that is responsible for maintaining the integrity and well-being of the content and business connectivity for tens of thousands of enterprises. It then belittled other individuals and organizations that have served one another faithfully for decades, labeling them as small and insignificant, inferring that @GorillaWarfare was the final and absolute say regarding what degree of authority they would have with respects to her published work. The Gorilla then literally set out to issue timed taunts, like it/she/he was gaining some sick and perverted pleasure from the suffering of others. With no care of the lives or impact it was leaving in its trail.

This is the story of Wikipedia's handling of Epik Holdings, Inc. This is unquestionably the story that is being told now in real time. You administrators are helping to cast light and truth, even if it was not your intent. Others have asked you to help, to show compassion, and to be reasonable. You hide conveniently beyond other articles, opinion columns, and hit pieces, and quote them as historical works demanding the steepest levels of preservation. Your ruse and mirrors are coming down. I promise.

You are no hero @GorillaWarfare. There is no honor in what you are doing. For whatever master you think you are serving, they will ultimately be exposed and fall. The childlike trails you leave are being exposed. The protection eroding. GoDaddy has 19 million customers. No one differentiates who they serve on their political orientation. They feed and unintentionally support horrific activities. The same goes with the other 200 active registrars that between them cover literally hundreds of millions of domain names under management. Twitter has created recent trends from scratch just this last week ranging from #AssassinationDay to #DeathtoAmerica. They harbor some of the most hateful angry individuals this world has ever seen. Same as Facebook. 2.4 billion followers, and if there are critical pages, they are normally separated and not utilized to intentionally harm and marginalize them. No small group of self-declared freedom fighters – designating themselves literally as “queers” and “feminists” - are holding their Wikipedia page hostage. Or deleting ten months’ worth of intelligent updates as they ignore every report of the degree by which context and reporting was clearly done out of political bias. That which you would find yourself selling your souls over is truly not worthy.

You have also conflated and wickedly let the interpretation and cesspool of editorial opinion become the basis for your articulations of choice that you now want to permanently mark as fact. Elevating hack jobs and attack pieces by known correspondents that serve calls to destroy others.

Wikipedia was supposed to be a global community of people creating and archiving our growth and journey together. You have perverted and stained the very essence of it, by succumbing to a level of confirmation bias so bad that it leaves most viewers with the impression that it must be paid for. Hence the constant comments you have endured that are reflective of the ludicrous nature you have adopted, as you wield your overpowered paintbrush. Oh how clever you must count yourself as. Likewise Google and Gmail. No one paints them as harbourer’s of extreme right racists, or facilitators of fraud, because of the billions of emails they issue without any regard to race, creed or color - a percentage of them will always be bad people with the intent to harm others. What would it even take for you in your outright arrogance to declare that “Epik has done nothing significant” outside of their support of right wing groups, Nazis, and extremists. How dare you. How dare you all. How do you think their families reacted when YOUR colleagues posted pictures of them, with the message they needed to be harassed and harmed at all costs?

This is an abuse of power what you are doing, and one that again relies upon your selective choosing of the narrative you intended to create and help nurture. The result of it has cost Epik Holdings Inc. millions of dollars in revenue. It has marginalized customers. It has reduced staff wages. A staff that I may add in almost its ENTIRETY consists of individuals who are not even white. Since you are so clearly caught up in race politics and the galvanization of respective voting blocks as a tool for your own masters to move around. How dare all of you embrace such smallness. Again - you have attracted the eye of change that will bring it righteously and fairly upon all that need to be exposed on a legal basis. Count on it. Think about it tonight when you are sleeping. You are harming people for sport, taunting them for fun, and leveraging editorial pieces from known paid radical political operators and calling it your job. Through a community-based encyclopedia no less. One that Google and others have chosen to make prominent in their results, with Eric and others calculating shrewdly what effect and impact it could take when they needed to call upon its contextual capabilities. Bet your dollar all will be exposed. It is disgusting.

A few points for you:

1. Eventually you become a footnote in the new Wikipedia page for Epik, whereby their courage to stand up for what is right exposes individuals with agendas that are soon to be exposed. Will you still then take to Twitter and call out other leaders in Epik's industry, and tell them that they are too "small" to be taken seriously in your world of perceived control? Disgusting and it will be exposed. The degree of empowerment that you have been given clearly indicates a mandate beyond what would normally be seen in government or private sectors. Outing won’t even be the word for it.

2. Rob Monster once said David Duke seemed to not be an idiot, under the context that he could be reached by people with love in their heart, and maybe that instead of CNN grandstanding his name to harm Trump, he could be instead made to renounce racism and lead people who had followed him to a better path. But Zucker himself gave the marching order that Duke needed to be elevated, so that he could be used as a counter position and media tool to harm the President. But you already know this. You saw the videos, and told others they were funny. Funny you said.

If you were a good reporter and article creator, maybe your headline should have been that CNN was responsible in giving David Duke an 80,000% media boost, when most people in this country had never heard of him. That the liberal left media outlets did more to damage this country in a single week out of their hatred for Trump, to the degree that they were prepared to compromise everything. Why? So individuals socially engineering mass immigration protocols to convert pathways for thirty million new votes could still try and get the supreme court seats they were banking on. So you helped conflate everything you could, knowing ultimately it just separated and polarized us more and more. Wikipedia, and the specific managers and administrative tool related to this attack on Epik, are part of this. You help to tear apart the country, because you have been sold a lie. Rob Monster and others are just convenient collateral in your sociopathic march.

Ultimately though, a couple writers just dropped the context of the comment about David Duke completely, and just made it look like an executive at Epik endorsed him. Disgusting and it will be exposed. As you all will be for your respective alliances. Your days of hiding behind codes and vernacular believing it gives you a false sense of protection are coming to an end. Mark these words. You will be exposed. Wikipedia does not set a legal precedent with respects to truth. This false code of signets and ancient codex references is not going to buy you a pass or protection from liberty herself.

3. Rob Monster never endorsed 8chan, gab, or any other groups or organizations right, left or otherwise spewing hate. He recognized the opportunity to purchase technology that could be integrated into his existing framework. He recognized that GoDaddy and others were grandstanding for positive press to support a narrative that was being constructed. He stood up for individuals on a general basis, reminding us gently that we should always be mindful of where we draw the line on free speech. Then he defined that line to further become a champion of responsible speech. He has no tolerance for hate, for racism, for ill comments based on religion, race, skin color, or belief systems. In fact - he has built one of the most impressive companies to fight inequality there is. There is not one of you sitting in judgement of this man and company worthy of joining him at this table. You will be exposed.

If it is down to Wikipedia or Epik, I know who I am putting my money on. You are already exposed and just don't know it. All these threads are serving to do is to illustrate to a fine legal point the bias you carry so that your masters can be identified. It draws you out one by one. One by one. So keep making your petty comments. Your taunts in good jest. These are lives you are harming. These are businesses you are ruining. These are families you are impacting. This perverted sense of justice you carry is twisted, ugly, and should have no place in this country and our home whatsoever. You should be very happy you are not yourself being judged by the same standards you have drawn against Epik. You have cited 15 sources as your means to destroy him. I could cite ten million with total and complete contempt for you. Would you like to see what feels like? When your life is ripped apart and a thousand paid operatives in media work to destroy your lives intentionally? While a handful of Wikipedia admins laugh and get joy from their control of it?

If you want something to report, go and explain to the world why all of these racist accounts exposed here are still active:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251230049090469888

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251215855771242501

This compounds from here, until eventually real heroes march into Wikipedia with warrants.

Do the right thing while you can! No one is asking you to whitewash anything. Soon your concept of conspiracy is going to become very very real. Take my advice.

XXX

 

[Rob Monster]

Mic drop. So bad ass. Legit impressive. God bless this fellow.

 

[Chris Hydrick]

Mic drop. So bad ass. Legit impressive. God bless this fellow.

XXX sounds like a thug to me.

All this thuggery calling out, makes me wonder who the real thug is.

Apologies you have to deal with this crap Molly (@ Gorilla Warfare)

 

[barybadrinath]

Why would they lock you? What are you doing to make them quickly block you?

If I would have been in usa I have definitely asked this question from owners of Wikipedia. Happy now

 

[JB Lions]

Mic drop. So bad ass. Legit impressive. God bless this fellow.

Are you serious? Acting like a bunch of nuts isn't helping your cause. And what does some comedian with the Twitter stuff have to do with this?

Side note, I wanted to vote for 3 registrars, GD, Dynadot, Namesilo, we all know who was stuffing the votes. Maybe I'll start the next poll, since I started the very first one, this time with some parameters. So it's a more legit poll.

 

[Chris Hydrick]

If I would have been in usa I have definitely asked this question from gorilla after finding him in his house

You deserve to be banned from namePros for saying that. Yes, banned.

#reported

 

[Chris Hydrick]

If I would have been in usa I have definitely asked this question from gorilla after finding him in his house

@Rob Monster -- like it or not. That's on you!!!

Your comments create this nonsense.

 

[Rob Monster]

If I would have been in usa I have definitely asked this question from gorilla after finding him in his house

Related comment:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1244713538586894336

Stay within the bounds of the law -- there is no room for extrajudicial justice. Keep it classy.

 

[Abdullah Abdullah]

If I would have been in usa I have definitely asked this question from gorilla after finding him in his house

I dont think you would have been that stupid to go to someone's house with such intention. Not good.

 

[NameShiba]

If I would have been in usa I have definitely asked this question from gorilla after finding him in his house

I would recant this post and delete it.

No need for offline threats.

 

[barybadrinath]

I dont think you would have been that stupid to go to someone's house with such intention. Not good.

Whoa. I just said that I wud have asked him simply why is he not following neutral rules and who is paying him. Why do all of you think that I have bad intentions. How could else can I find someone.

 

[Abdullah Abdullah]

Whoa. I just said that I wud have asked him simply why is he not following neutral rules and who is paying him. Why do all of you think that I have bad intentions. How could else can I find someone.

Well re-read your post then tell us what conclusion you reach. The way you wrote it is a clear threat. Period

 

[barybadrinath]

It's the rule of the world we live in. Some assistant of Wikipedia can defame a big company on a global forum without evidence and can get personal with the owner of that company for no reason still people like @Grilled says sorry to him.
But when we register our protest these same people @Grilled starts calling us as thugs , racist , murderers and whatsoever. What a neutral stand you have @Grilled.
And yes report me 1000 times. Report me wherever you can. I am not intimidated by thugs

 

[Rob Monster]

Twitter engaged:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251358685965631488

 

[Chris Hydrick]

It's the rule of the world we live in.

Well, this is namePros.

You don't make threats here.

Your words have a trickle effect.

Even though you may not be in America. Others are.

I hope namePros bans you.

I don't mind if they restrict me, or ban me.

My response might not have been right.

But yours, a clear threat, was clearly wrong.

And I'll be damned if I put up with that.

 

[barybadrinath]

Well, this is namePros.

You don't make threats here.

Your words have a trickle effect.

Even though you may not be in America. Others are.

I hope namePros bans you.

I don't mind if they restrict me, or ban me.

My response might not have been right.

But yours, a clear threat, was clearly wrong.

And I'll be damned if I put up with that.

I do not understand which part of my statement demonstrate threat. I am a non violent person and a follower of mahatma gandhi.
You tell me how can I talk with someone and ask him a question if I do not meet him. How can I talk with him without finding him. How can I find him apart from reaching where he lives or works. Does just going to someone's home to ask a question is considered a threat. I do not understand

 

[barybadrinath]

I do not understand which part of my statement demonstrate threat. I am a non violent person and a follower of mahatma gandhi.
You tell me how can I talk with someone and ask him a question if I do not meet him. How can I talk with him without finding him. How can I find him apart from reaching where he lives or works. Does just going to someone's home to ask a question is considered a threat. I do not understand

I clearly mentioned TALKING. since when talking comes in the category of fighting. Here in India if we need to end the differences between two ppl we sit and talk. That's what I said

 

[NameShiba]

I do not understand which part of my statement demonstrate threat. I am a non violent person and a follower of mahatma gandhi.
You tell me how can I talk with someone and ask him a question if I do not meet him. How can I talk with him without finding him. How can I find him apart from reaching where he lives or works. Does just going to someone's home to ask a question is considered a threat. I do not understand

It can be interpreted as a threat.

I would simply revise your post saying that you would ask questions in regard to this issue.

Typically going to somebody's residence is a sign of threat -- or can be viewed as a threat.

Online posts can be taken in a million different ways -- because you posted in a way that you thought was not threatening, other people may take it as a threat.

I would edit the post and make it clear that you are just aggravated over the situation and wish no ill will or personal attacks to the other people involved.

And keep the conversation as civil as possible so there is a proper resolution on the topic.

Also @ all parties

Try to not create a flame war on the issues. I would keep any conversation to the Wikipedia talk page listing sources for why or why not that the article should be changed.

Any kind of personal scuffles here on the forums may cause other issues such as getting this thread locked or deleted by the staff when they review the conversation.

Cheers.

 

[Chris Hydrick]

Does just going to someone's home to ask a question is considered a threat.

Well, some might consider this stalking.

I do not understand

You can talk to her on wiki talk, or twitter.

Why the need to include threatening remarks? Is that the kind of behavior you wish to teach others?

If you resemble the average Epik customer, than I am ashamed to be apart of that thuggish group.

 

[barybadrinath]

It can be interpreted as a threat.

I would simply revise your post saying that you would ask questions in regard to this issue.

Typically going to somebody's residence is a sign of threat -- or can be viewed as a threat.

Online posts can be taken in a million different ways -- because you posted in a way that you thought was not threatening, other people may take it as a threat.

I would edit the post and make it clear that you are just aggravated over the situation and wish no ill will or personal attacks to the other people involved.

And keep the conversation as civil as possible so there is a proper resolution on the topic.

I understand and i agree
Also I am sorry if someone is hurt by my words. I think it's misinterpretation of my statement. I simply meant talking and nothing else and that too in a lighter mood when Mr Abdullah asked me why Wikipedia blocked me. I do not support violence ,I do not support threats and I believe in peace and harmony.

 

[barybadrinath]

Well, some might consider this stalking.



You can talk to her on wiki talk, or twitter.

Why the need to include threatening remarks? Is that the kind of behavior you wish to teach others.

I am sorry ,what did you say "her".
Do you mean gorilla is a lady .

 

[Chris Hydrick]

I am sorry ,what did you say "her".
Do you mean gorilla is a lady .

Does it matter?

Just leave it alone man. Wait for mods to get involved and clean this mess up. I will put you on ignore to try and not escalate this any further.

@Mod Team Alfa @Mod Team Bravo @Mod Team Echo @Mod Team Foxtrot

 

[barybadrinath]

I am sorry ,what did you say "her".
Do you mean gorilla is a lady .

If Gorilla is a lady I take back my words of even talking also. I thought gorilla was a man named Terrence Williams speaking in twitter video posted above. I am quite afraid of feminist activists and me too campaigns. Sorry gorilla madam

 

[Rob Monster]

Check this out:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Grayfell

This is one of the senior admins at Wikipedia in charge of harming Epik.

Click on this:

And it takes you to this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip...I_(or_Most_Plusquamperfect_Looshpah_Laureate)

What exactly is this nonsense doing on Wikipedia?

In case it is not patently obvious to all, Wikipedia is a secret society masquerading as a public service.

 

[JB Lions]

Grilled posted it below, I couldn't get the format right.