Will you register .name?

[zdscn]

will you register .name?

 

[armstrong]

Have registered, and will continue to do so as opportunities come up. However, a lot of the .name-relevant keywords have already been taken.

Why do you ask - will cnobin be offering these soon?

 

[zdscn]

LOL
Cnobin want to offer .name. But before that, we want to check the popularity of .name.
Thanks armstrong!

 

[Sabre]

Ive never reged a .name and probably never will ...

 

[Tippy]

I don't see myself registering one any time soon, as armstrong pointed out all the goodies are long gone...

Mike

 

[Terry]

That is not my experience. Still, it is the last choice for me. Most of the names I register are for resale and if I find a good .name I'll pick it up. But, it really has to be a gem.

 

[superprogrammer]

.name sucks except few

 

[dgridley]

.NAME is great for surname or genealogy related, plus there are still quite a few relevant and desirable .name still available... just have to look!

will you register .name?

 

[zdscn]

till now, only 8 polls

 

[Sergio965]

Probably not....I don't like them much..there's really no point.

 

[Premium]

Don't seem valuable so therfore I don't buy them

At 100 posts now and 200 NP!!! :tu: :tu: :tu: :tu:

 

[jeter4982]

nope. i only reg .com and sometimes .net

 

[CrazyTech]

I would; it just depends upon what is available.

 

[1rrr1]

no lol

 

[TLDnetworks]

Reged only one - CAA.name (available for the right offer :D )

Only reged it because of the the good LLL and all other TLD's are taken. Every other .name I've considered has been taken, so don't see much in the future.
( I did the poll)

 

[HFear]

I don't register .name domains because they cost more than .com/.net domains, and the .com/.net are usually the ones that bring in the type-ins.