Thanks to Kate we now know this is an extension to the EPP, so is there a list (public or not public someone could share) about which registrars actually implement this extension?
I guess there is no public list, it is up to the registrars to implement the service.
I searched on the Verisign website, but could not find much information about ConsoliDate. There is also a
searchable listing of registrars on their site but you can't use ConsoliDate as a search criterion, again for the obvious reason that it depends on what kind of backend they are using and whether they have customized it.
In short, if the registrars don't actively advertise the feature on their website, I would assume they have not bothered to implement it. But don't hesitate to approach your favorite registrar(s) and ask. Perhaps someone will be willing to perform a one-shot update for you
I have myself set up an EPP box very recently, so I had to do some research into the software solutions available on the market. There are a few off the shelf systems (exemple: Cocca tools), either open-source or proprietary, or you can use classes/modules in languages like Python, Perl or PHP to build your own system.
Generally speaking, the tools only implement the
standard EPP commands, like register, renew, delete, update, transfer. For many TLDs this is enough.
Some TLDs may require the use of
EPP extensions, for example to accommodate extra fields in registrant profile like ID number, TM registration number, or VAT or stuff like that. Usually the registry will provide the XML schema. You 'just' have to populate the XML document and send it as EPP command.
So that is the ugly truth: each TLD may require
customizations, not to mention the peculiarities and different life cycles of ccTLDs. On top of that some ccTLDs do not use EPP but a different protocol, or they may use EPP with occasional deviations from standard. Obviously the registrars (and the coders) would rather keep it as simple as possible.
That is a reason why big (American) registrars handle ccTLDs so poorly: they try to 'align' practices (let's-pretend-this-is-a-dot-com) across TLDs and don't always bother to follow the rules strictly.
name.com offers this also
Yes, we know this from post #1
