my contribution is to get to the point
Nonsense. Your last 3 posts are a distraction and don't even attempt to address "the point" at all.
Remember, the subject of this thread is: "Whats going on with Epik and Rob Monster?"
Undeniably, religion is very important to Rob. Clearly, Rob's christianity is a factor in "what's going on". Even an atheist like myself or an outside observer will notice that.
Of all the people who deserve to express an opinion about "What's going on with Rob Monster", surely the 1 person who most deserves to express an opinion is Rob Monster. And Rob has chosen to explain himself in terms of his religious faith.
Yet you tell him to shut up about religion – as if that important factor in what's going on must (for some reason) be unmentionable, as if Rob should only be allowed to explain himself in terms that you personally agree with. Absurd.
Personally, I think that forays into religion or politics are counterproductive, since those 2 topics are divisive. But that is the very heart of this issue, isn't it? This scandal arose in the first place because Rob's views on religion / politics had become involved with Epik (or the public perception of Epik). So to ban discussions of religion or politics in this thread would be ludicrous.
In a long thread like this one, which touches on many separate topics, the conversation takes tangents. For example, negative things were said about Islam. So naturally muslims (and those of us who see Islam more favorably) will respond. The tangents are inevitable, and the responses are justifiable.
@frank-germany, Many of your posts (including the last 3) have also started tangents (or meta-discussions about the discussions Frank will allow us to have).
Religion isn't the only topic you're telling people to shut up about, Frank. You've also told me to shut up (or say less) about censorship, freedom of speech, registrant rights, registrar responsibilities to police content, etc. Once again, those are factors in "what's going on". They are the issues Rob and I have both cited to explain the decision to allow Gab.com to be transferred to Epik. And that transfer began a scandal that led to the present perception of Epik. So these issues are undeniably relevant.
If all of these factors – religion, politics, censorship, a registrar's role into policing content – are "unrelated nonsense", as you seem to think, Frank, then permit me to ask what topics you, in your infinite wisdom, will allow us to discuss here in this NamePros thread? Rob and I, who the 2 people with the closest connection to the topic at hand, are continually being told by you to keep our mouths shut. Perhaps you can enlighten us about what we're allowed to say?