What type of parked pages do you prefer and why?

[hiweb]

Hi all,

I was just wondering what type of parked pages you prefer, either the barebones, links-only parked pages or the more visual (ie. graphic headers) parked pages?

Also, why do you like them better? Are you getting more revenue, better CTR, trying for more return visitors?

All comments are greatly appreciated

 

[Keynes]

More visual, quasi-developed pages have higher CTR rates, in general. The goal is to deliver content in a user-friendly manner to visitors, which can also garner some return visits and further increase CTR.

 

[RogueWriter]

I like domainspa.com ' s parking sites. If you want an example, here is one of mine: www.wackycentral.com . As you bulk add your domains into their system, you can choose from a wide variety of topics relevant to your domain name.

 

[gazzip]

I like domainspa.com ' s parking sites. If you want an example, here is one of mine: www.wackycentral.com . As you bulk add your domains into their system, you can choose from a wide variety of topics relevant to your domain name.

That ones quite nice IMO - I have seen a skenzo one that was really nice IMO but I can't remember the domain, maybe someone can post an example of a skenzo parking page ??

I think having a small amount of graphics makes it more appealing but I have no proof that it increase click rate - I would think it does though.

 

[fonzie_007]

If I am just parking, I prefer the 1 click over the portal pages. For my minisites, I try to get at least one picture, some text, and my ad links, although my minisites could use some more work...