- Impact
- 1
Hi all,
I received a phone call this morning from the CEO of a company threatening me to turn over a domain I registered, needgifts.com. He told me that if I didn't turn it over he would persue action with ICANN because I "bought the name with the sole purpose of trying to sell it to [them]" (which I didn't). He then asked who another individual was, and I had no clue who he was referring to. I had him forward me the e-mail he received, and it was another individual trying to sell him the domain (that I own) for $100 through cenion.com. The company owns needgifts.net but the name they seem to be running under is "Dr. Weaver’s World of Products". They didn't register an official trademark under "Need Gifts" or "NeedGifts". The caller ended the conversation by saying something to the effect of: "let's settle this, or we will fight over the name and you will lose". Obviously they are too cheap to pay the $100 to the person who tried to sell it to them (by mistake or maliciously), so I think he wants it for regfee. Now I do own a lot of domains, most of which I'm planning to sell, however safesys from DS listed some of the UDRP cases where speculation of generic terms has been upheld as legal (see below).
Can someone with better knowledge advise? The caller wants to hear back from me by tomorrow (and who knows what else he'll accuse me of). :o
Thanks
ezstreet.net
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.10 Moreover, neither mere registration, nor general offers to sell, domain names which consist of generic, common, or descriptive terms can be considered acts of bad faith. Shirmax Retail Ltd./Detaillants Shirmax Ltee v. CES Marketing Group, Inc., ICANN Case No. AF-0104; Allocation Network GmbH v. Steve Gregory, ICANN Case No. D2000-0016.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
digitalcitymap.com
http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/dec...d2000-1283.html
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speculation within open domain namespaces is perfectly permissible within the boundaries set by the UDRP. A speculator might register perfectly innocent names with the address "Domain for Sale" to indicate that it is happy to contemplate sale of the name at some point in the future. Within the trade mark system of countries, and within the UDRP, it is permissible to sell one’s legitimate interest to a mark or name, if another party with a legitimate interest is prepared to offer a price that is acceptable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
onu.com
http://www.disputes.org/eresolution/decisions/0672.htm
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, buying and selling domain names is not, in and of itself, evidence of bad faith, a principle now firmly entrenched in many decisions rendered made under the UDRP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I received a phone call this morning from the CEO of a company threatening me to turn over a domain I registered, needgifts.com. He told me that if I didn't turn it over he would persue action with ICANN because I "bought the name with the sole purpose of trying to sell it to [them]" (which I didn't). He then asked who another individual was, and I had no clue who he was referring to. I had him forward me the e-mail he received, and it was another individual trying to sell him the domain (that I own) for $100 through cenion.com. The company owns needgifts.net but the name they seem to be running under is "Dr. Weaver’s World of Products". They didn't register an official trademark under "Need Gifts" or "NeedGifts". The caller ended the conversation by saying something to the effect of: "let's settle this, or we will fight over the name and you will lose". Obviously they are too cheap to pay the $100 to the person who tried to sell it to them (by mistake or maliciously), so I think he wants it for regfee. Now I do own a lot of domains, most of which I'm planning to sell, however safesys from DS listed some of the UDRP cases where speculation of generic terms has been upheld as legal (see below).
Can someone with better knowledge advise? The caller wants to hear back from me by tomorrow (and who knows what else he'll accuse me of). :o
Thanks
ezstreet.net
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.10 Moreover, neither mere registration, nor general offers to sell, domain names which consist of generic, common, or descriptive terms can be considered acts of bad faith. Shirmax Retail Ltd./Detaillants Shirmax Ltee v. CES Marketing Group, Inc., ICANN Case No. AF-0104; Allocation Network GmbH v. Steve Gregory, ICANN Case No. D2000-0016.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
digitalcitymap.com
http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/dec...d2000-1283.html
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speculation within open domain namespaces is perfectly permissible within the boundaries set by the UDRP. A speculator might register perfectly innocent names with the address "Domain for Sale" to indicate that it is happy to contemplate sale of the name at some point in the future. Within the trade mark system of countries, and within the UDRP, it is permissible to sell one’s legitimate interest to a mark or name, if another party with a legitimate interest is prepared to offer a price that is acceptable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
onu.com
http://www.disputes.org/eresolution/decisions/0672.htm
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, buying and selling domain names is not, in and of itself, evidence of bad faith, a principle now firmly entrenched in many decisions rendered made under the UDRP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------













