1cruiser said:
kngavl said:
Bill HR 3754,
The extensions to the Trademark Act would make the provision of misleading contact details when registering a domain an offence. Not only that but a โwillfulโ offence - which in American law means three-times normal payout. Also, anyone โacting in concert with the violatorโ or โmaintaining or renewing such registrationโ would also be guilty. In the case of a trademark infringement on the domain โthe maximum imprisonment otherwise provided by law for a felony offense shall be increased by 7 yearsโ.
But it's okay mate, everyone makes mistakes.
looks like a "Bill" to me and not yet law...and it only applies in the US...and according to your posting, trademark infringement is 7 years, not for misleading contact details.
If such a law exists today where a person can get 7 years for misleading contact details, please show the law.....and it does not apply to anyone outside of the US, if such a law exists.
H.R.3632
It did pass both houses.
Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act
SEC. 204. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE.
(a) Sentencing Enhancement- Section 3559 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
`(f)(1) If a defendant who is convicted of a felony offense (other than offense of which an element is the false registration of a domain name) knowingly falsely registered a domain name and knowingly used that domain name in the course of that offense, the maximum imprisonment otherwise provided by law for that offense shall be doubled or increased by 7 years, whichever is less.
`(2) As used in this section--
`(A) the term `falsely registers' means registers in a
manner that prevents the effective identification of or contact with the person who registers; and
`(B) the term `domain name' has the meaning given that term is section 45 of the Act entitled `An Act to provide for the registration and protection of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, and for other purposes' approved July 5, 1946 (commonly referred to as the `Trademark Act of 1946') (15 U.S.C. 1127).'.
Became Public Law No: 108-482
And yes this exists and only refers to US law, but the domain at hand is registered to a United States Address thus it's relevant.