Dynadot — .com Transfer

Two 6-Figure Sales Lead New DNJournal.com Top 20 List

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch
Impact
4,993
The new weekly domain sales report is out at DNJournal.com. This time around a pair or 6-figure deals head the chart, with one of those closing at over $277,000. The .nets enjoyed a good week with three 5-figure entries among the top ten sales. Great Britain's .co.uk also has a slot on the Big Board and that extension dominated the ccTLD chart, taking five of the ten entries. Read all about it through the link below:

DNJournal.com Weekly Domain Sales Report
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Nice sales.

Also nice to see another .EU domain being sold:

UFU.eu €4,995 = $6,380 Sedo
 
0
•••
Damion said:
Nice sales.

Also nice to see another .EU domain being sold:

UFU.eu €4,995 = $6,380 Sedo

Overpriced. The buyer should have caught a couple of 3 letter .eu domains in the drops for a total of euro 1k or so, then offered a swap for the single ufu.eu domain (whose letters are not particularly prime). or maybe offer a swap for a single 3 letter domain with better letters + 500 euro. no reasonable seller could refuse such an offer.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Couple of real nice ones on there. I actually think CD.com went for a pretty reasonable amount considering it uses (music, money related, generic acronym)
 
0
•••
fonzie_007 said:
Couple of real nice ones on there. I actually think CD.com went for a pretty reasonable amount considering it uses (music, money related, generic acronym)

fonzie

I would agree with you
 
0
•••
~~ said:
Overpriced. The buyer should have caught a couple of 3 letter .eu domains in the drops for a total of euro 1k or so, then offered a swap for the single ufu.eu domain (whose letters are not particularly prime). or maybe offer a swap for a single 3 letter domain with better letters + 500 euro. no reasonable seller could refuse such an offer.

I really don't think you can classify it as overpriced. The buyer obviously got the exact name they wanted at a price they were willing to pay. So I think the price was right.

The buyer didn't want a 3 letter domain with "better letters" because UFU is apparently the acronym for something they are going to develop.

Think end-user, not domainer.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
There is no overpriced in this competitive area of three letter names. If one person cannot afford it, I am sure someone else will.
 
0
•••
Another nice week in DN sales...Thanks duke :)
 
0
•••
Nice sales there...Nice to see the Eu's going for a bit... :p
 
0
•••
VV said:
I really don't think you can classify it as overpriced. The buyer obviously got the exact name they wanted at a price they were willing to pay. So I think the price was right.

The buyer didn't want a 3 letter domain with "better letters" because UFU is apparently the acronym for something they are going to develop.

Maybe I should have left out the word overpriced, but in most markets what one person will pay for an item can be very different from its fair price.
The cost of replacing a domain with one of a similar quality must be at least some sort of guide as to its fair price.

The domainer is allowed some markup, but surely not the huge multiples that are often demanded.
Normally, sellers of goods deserve a markup because they add value, such as shipping goods to the high street.

Most retailers would be happy with a low multiple of trade price. Yet, domainers usually ask for huge multiples of what they would pay themselves, even though they have added no value.

If a buyer wants a particular 3 letter .eu domain, and points out to the seller that good 3 letter domains can be acquired for $1k, then in my opinion the seller should have no right to ask for more than $1-2k.

Having said that, if the buyer does not negotiate sensibly, and is happy to pay a higher price, then I would not begrudge the seller a somewhat larger profit.
 
0
•••
~~ said:
If a buyer wants a particular 3 letter .eu domain, and points out to the seller that good 3 letter domains can be acquired for $1k, then in my opinion the seller should have no right to ask for more than $1-2k.
The seller has the 'right' to ask whatever price they want, and nobody else has the right to tell them otherwise, nor should they. I understand the point about many domainers expecting too much money for their names, but that's a whole different story.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
VV said:
The seller has the 'right' to ask whatever price they want, and nobody else has the right to tell them otherwise, nor should they. I understand the point about many domainers expecting too much money for their names, but that's a whole different story.

My words were careless, the main point is that the seller can ask what he likes, but I believe cannot effectively justify a price far in excess of what it would cost to replace the domain with one of similar quality.
Luckily for sellers, most buyers do not ask them to justify prices.
 
0
•••

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back