If you been on the prowl for strong search terms, I'm sure you have run across instances where a single word is used less frequently in searches, than is a two word name using the same word, but w/ a qualifier.
Here's a hypothetical that demonstrates one such situation that I recently ran across w/ approx the same search result #'s: "Turnip" OV searches 7500, regged in all tlds and all major cctlds. "TurnipSoup" OV searches 32,000, regged in .com only.
Have often wondered about the rationale behind this. Both names are brandable and, in this example, the two worder contains only 4 additional letters. Assuming that the .net and the .org fit the term and the relative weakness of ,info, ,biz, .us and other cctlds to .net and .org, -(I know this is debatable- but not central to this question)- why are the single word "minor tlds" regged before the .net and .org 2 word domains, which are the superior seach terms and exts.
Can it simply be the power of the dictionary word and speculation on the minor tlds and cctlds, or is there something else at play here?
Here's a hypothetical that demonstrates one such situation that I recently ran across w/ approx the same search result #'s: "Turnip" OV searches 7500, regged in all tlds and all major cctlds. "TurnipSoup" OV searches 32,000, regged in .com only.
Have often wondered about the rationale behind this. Both names are brandable and, in this example, the two worder contains only 4 additional letters. Assuming that the .net and the .org fit the term and the relative weakness of ,info, ,biz, .us and other cctlds to .net and .org, -(I know this is debatable- but not central to this question)- why are the single word "minor tlds" regged before the .net and .org 2 word domains, which are the superior seach terms and exts.
Can it simply be the power of the dictionary word and speculation on the minor tlds and cctlds, or is there something else at play here?
