Their Message:
-------------------
02-Jul-2019
Dear Sir/Madam,
This is to notify you that the website at the below listed URL(s) (“the Unauthorized Site”), infringes upon the intellectual property rights of Clarivate Analytics (“Clarivate Analytics”). We request that the page be immediately disabled and content removed.
https://journalimpactfactors.com/research/terms/
https://journalimpactfactors.com/
The Unauthorized Site infringes copyrights held by Clarivate Analytics in its site located at
https://clarivate.com/products/journal-citation-reports/. The Unauthorized Site is not authorized by the copyright or intellectual property right owner, Clarivate Analytics, its agents, or the law.
Under penalty of perjury, I hereby declare that this Notice is accurate and that I am authorized to act on behalf of Clarivate Analytics.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this notice or need any additional information in order to remove the content.
Sincerely,
Clarivate Analytics Trademark Enforcement
--------------------------------------------------------
My Reply:
--------------------------------------------------------
04-Jul-2019
First of all, please refer to our first dispute on case number: [Case
#640524]
There was a definite time given to clarivate to mutually initiate the UDRP case; to which i never heard back from you; that was considered as your give up, on that case.
Secondly, on a recent case
#654192, we will be happy to mutually solve it (compensation based), or to take it in the court for further legal proceedings as we are clearly not infringing any content rights of clarivate. It is clearly mentioned in our terms of service that this website
journalimpactfactors.com is a 'user' research-based social website that allows users to leave reviews on different scientific journals based on their personal manuscript submission experiences to various journals followed by the submission outcomes. The users then be able to leave their feedback score on journal-specific pages such as how long it took for a specific user to get his manuscript accepted or rejected by a certain journal and this review then be seen publically that helps other researchers to find a good journal.
--
It is also mentioned in our terms that the impact factors and other journal metrics are calculated by clarivateanalytics and the outbound link is also given. Whereas, clarivate does not hold the rights to stop us resharing the journal specific metrices which as also displayed on any journal specific website. For example, if we directly go to the journal website "cellulose', then their stats are available on their website that can be shared to promote that specific journal.
--
Before taking this in court, it must also be noted that the only aim of our website is to allow users to leave reviews on their manuscript submission experiences on journal pages of our website to help other researches to evaluate how fast or how slow the journal will handle their manuscript. Whereas, some journal specific data is also shown on the website that was taken from journal specific websites (not by clarivate analytics), to promote the journal among researchers, whereas, the outbound link was given to clarivateanalytics in our terms section.
--
We will be happy to mutually solve this case or to take it in the courts.
Thanks.