

DN Tycoon said:viciouscircle said:I honestly think that as of right now, the most likely chance as far as a woman becoming president would be senator Olympia Snowe of Maine, but not for a few more years. Clinton and Rice have too much bad associated with each of them and either one would be a bad move for a nomination (although we all know Hillary has had her eye on the job since before Bill even finished his terms). Either one would more than likely be easily defeated in a national election.
Snowe on the other hand, has decades of applicable experience, and was selected by Time as one of "America's 10 Best Senators" back in April. Her main issue is lack of name recognition with the majority (or should i say, plurality) of Americans, however her politics are rather moderate and she is from New England, so if she could swing a Republican nomination she would have a great chance at winning it all. Otherwise, if she wants to make a run at it, she will have to spend a few years getting her name out there a bit more.
The first woman president will be a dem not a rep.....that's just about guaranteed .![]()
PCWebAdvice said:Women can handle more than men! They can multi-task too. I am a guy, so I am not playing some feminine speach, but it is proven!
PCWebAdvice said:Women can handle more than men! They can multi-task too. I am a guy, so I am not playing some feminine speach, but it is proven!
PCWebAdvice said:The fact that women can multi-task and men can't. Plus women wouldn't get caught in sex scandals, and they know how to keep their mouth shut. Men just brag and then everything goes around...
Let's face it, lol.
B33R said:Definitely better than Blair IMO, she still screwed a few things up but at least she wasn't a lying, smarmy, smug, waste of air like Tony Blair is. :imho:
HHDomains said:Sadly this thread turned from an innocent question to a plethora of ignorance and idiotic sterotypes.
DN Tycoon said:The first woman president will be a dem not a rep.....that's just about guaranteed .![]()
HHDomains said:You can call them whatever you like, but when someone states something as "fact" is is no longer "opinion" unless there is some sort of evidece to back it up.
HHDomains said:I don't think I am the one to go off topic.
Opinions are only opinions until someone presents them as fact. Then they do require evidence.


