NameSilo

THREAD CLOSED

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

Which one of the following two domains do you think is untoppable?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top

    24 
    votes
    31.6%
  • comcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcom.com

    52 
    votes
    68.4%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains โ€” AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains โ€” AI Storefront
 
Last edited:
0
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
.Top is now below 1.3 million regs.

A drop from almost 5 million regs, only a year ago!

My guess is that .top will drop further and be below 1M, within this year.
 
1
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Drops are a "washing out" - process.
But in the meanwhile the situation is another, maybe this NAMESTAT - screenshot (made today) will change your guess:

Show attachment 80356

Now please stay on topic and let us knowww which one is the untoppable domain if you (don't want to ignore this threads actual topic and if you) knowww it.

.top.top is untoppable. there is no shorter untoppable domain
 
0
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
.top.top is untoppable. there is no shorter untoppable domain
Great point! Top.top out tops all other domains that have 'top' in them in the unspectacular .top extension.

Better domains exist of course than top.top, maybe even whois.top or iam.top

This parody thread continues. Noone is fooled.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
THE .top DOMAIN
toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top

This domain is the result of...

...the highest possible TLD > .top
...the highest possible number of the highest possible superlative 'top' > 21
...the highest possible number of characters > 63


or


THE .com DOMAIN
comcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcomcom.com

This domain is the result of...
...the most known TLD > .com
...the most possible number of the abbrevation 'com' > 21
...the most possible number of characters > 63
Both domains are lacking the branding needed in a modern world, who has time or wants to make sure they have retyped something 21 times ?? Poor quality domain names indeed
 
1
•••
Of the two horrific domains - I think toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top is the more untoppable crap
 
Last edited:
1
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Blablaablaaablaaaa

While the untoppable domain has absolute top quality in ancient + modern world (simply allways) your comment has absolute nooo qualityyy in ancient + modern world (simply never) because you obviouslyyy totallyyy do not understand the core / nature of these / this domain/s.


I think you you are just jealous that you don't own / can't afford the untoppable domain - that's why you are intentionalyyy ignoring this thread's topic = question.


But of course you can always decide to turn on-topic and answer this thread's question which domain is untoppable or to leave this thread.

If you will prefer to turn on-topic, instead of leaving this thread or continuing being off-topic, but still don't knowww what's the topic of this thread, then you should go back to the opening post of this thread:

toptoptop... ...top.top / comcomcom... ...com.com >>> Which domain is untoppable?
https://www.namepros.com/threads/toptoptop-top-top-vs-comcomcom-com-com.1028831

80562_3d21250e6f0f7d77098f46585359ff67.png


Hope this helps.

+++

Blablaablaaablaaaa

All what is "untoppable crap" is your off-topic / unrealistic / self-deceptive comment, you are obviouslyyy also just jealous that you don't own it / can't afford it, that's why you (try to) "attak" it (well known scheme / behaviour in human psychology) - but no chance, you would be more successfull if you would try to sell sand to a beduin.

Let me tell you, you are just showing the world that you are unable to comprehend / handle this domain's ultimate status.

But of course you can always decide to turn on-topic and answer this thread's question which domain is untoppable or to leave this thread.

If you will prefer to turn on-topic, instead of leaving this thread or continuing being off-topic, but still don't knowww what's the topic of this thread, then you should go back to the opening post of this thread:

toptoptop... ...top.top / comcomcom... ...com.com >>> Which domain is untoppable?
https://www.namepros.com/threads/toptoptop-top-top-vs-comcomcom-com-com.1028831


80562_3d21250e6f0f7d77098f46585359ff67.png


Hope this helps.
ANVWAET
(absolutely no value whatsoever and easily toppable)
 
0
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
And?
Whats your point??
Do you really think I care about these numbers???


HAHAAHAAAHAAAAHAAAAA

No number can untop the untoppable domain and I am sure you knowww that very well.


If indeed not, then GO AND TRY TO TOP IT but let me remind you that all your past / present / future desperate attempts to untop something what is untoppable were / are / will be just a loss of your valuable time and energyyy

So better save your valuable time and energyyy
The only way to "top" the untoppable domain, is to buy it because then you own = "top" it.


Now turn on-topic and answer this thread's question which domain is the untoppable one or leave this thread.
If you don't knowww what's the topic of this thread, then you should go back to the opening post of this thread:


toptoptop... ...top.top / comcomcom... ...com.com >>> Which domain is untoppable?

https://www.namepros.com/threads/to...om-com-com-which-domain-is-untoppable.1028831

80562_3d21250e6f0f7d77098f46585359ff67.png


Hope this helps.
Every number tops 0. $0
 
1
•••
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
Appraise.net
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back