showcase Showcase your .si domains (super-intelligence)

[Andreas B.]

Thanks to @Lox we now know, that Microsoft owns the domain copilot .si

SI, clearly, stands for Super Intelligence in this case.

Do you own any .si domains?


I'll start with the one I have;

Roboter .si


How about you?

 

[DaveX]

regged my first .si domain. Reg fee was very reasonable at Dyna.

mythic.si

can't hurt to have a few of these.

 

[SLDOptions]

OpenAI is turning its attention to ‘superintelligence’​

https://techcrunch.com/2025/01/05/openai-is-beginning-to-turn-its-attention-to-superintelligence/

 

[SLDOptions]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1877112898280993178

 

[SLDOptions]

Agentic.si domain name sold, we don't know the price yet. The seller (EDDY)
announced the sale on X

 

[SLDOptions]

Traffic on .si domains are slowly growing.

 

[NameGroove]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1877112898280993178

I wouldn't listen to this Jason on X... he blocks accounts that have an alternate view of .si

Anyone that can't allow conversations on both sides is simply "talking his book" as they say in finance and does not have a defensible position. Not everyone must agree with someone - as long as they are kind and courteous debate should be allowed and encouraged - not blocked.

 

[SLDOptions]

I wouldn't listen to this Jason on X... he blocks accounts that have an alternate view of .si

Anyone that can't allow conversations on both sides is simply "talking his book" as they say in finance and does not have a defensible position. Not everyone must agree with someone - as long as they are kind and courteous debate should be allowed and encouraged - not blocked.

If you've been blocked by me there must be a valid reason. You can have a different view or opinions which is fine however I will not tolerate any swearing or personal attacks.

 

[NameGroove]

If you've been blocked by me there must be a valid reason. You can have a different view or opinions which is fine however I will not tolerate any swearing or personal attacks.

Instead of actually searching X to see my replies before responding, you disparage and assert (untruthfully I might add) that I did something I did not do. I was allowed to post/reply to you until Oct 18 and prior to that had 14 replies to you. I show screenshots of my 14 responses in reverse order. See any curses? See any personal attacks? NO and NO. Nothing close to a personal attack but rather a few responses offering a differing viewpoint in four of the replies and 10 other comments re .si transfers and replies to your questions.

Own up to your blocks. Perhaps they are because you want to push a narrative and I challenged that narrative? Perhaps not. But surely NOT because I cursed and surely NOT because of any personal attacks. I vigorously defend your right to block me on X. But I do not defend your right to do so in quiet. Further I will not allow you to disparage me or my account or assert I did something I did not do. And I provide the courtesy of proof of what was said (unlike you who disparage without any proof, obviously because what you said was untrue).

It is now public for all to see - either on or sometime after Oct 18 I was blocked by DCLJasonx and you can see my 14 posts that led Jason to do it.

And I say again to the community... do not listen to someone who cannot have a dialogue - and then disparages the other instead of owning up to their own perspective. Again, I defend Jason's right to block me on X. However, I defend my right to make that block publicly known - so everyone can see the reason why. I believe that reason is now quite obvious. DCLJasonx has a narrative to push re his .si portfolio and will not countenance anyone offering a different viewpoint no matter how polite - and although claims different viewpoints "are fine" he blocks those that present them.

 

[Name2go]

The few upright .si ambassadors should - instead of cannibalizing each other - persuade the owner of X to invite Slovenia to join the USA as the 53rd state (or No. 52 after Greenland and Canada?). Reason: The importance of the ccTLD for the perfection of Artificial Intelligence. @NameGroove , @SLDOptions and I would then be promoted to the Governor's Triumvirate.

Just hallucinating ...

 

[SLDOptions]

If you don't want to listen to JasonX maybe it's good that he blocked you so you can't listen to him. Win Win

 

[NameGroove]

If you don't want to listen to JasonX maybe it's good that he blocked you so you can't listen to him. Win Win

Based on your recent post (shown in the screenshot), you make us believe you are DCLJasonX. Now you respond in the 3rd person, suggesting you are not DCLJasonX.

Instead of standing behind untruths and different handles why not just be a stand up guy and apologize for blocking me for neither of the disparaging reasons you assert in the screenshot? Do you have any principles at all?

 

[SLDOptions]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1881190288364011973

 

[NameGroove]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1881190288364011973

This is why. No matter how much you want "si" to mean super intelligence, people are not using that term. They have been, and are, using artificial intelligence as the accepted societal term. Unless society changes their vernacular, you're wasting your time and money. Now, if society starts using the term super intelligence and it becomes ubiquitous, then, .si would be a nice TLD to own. But that is one incredible long shot (much harder than .ai - because artificial intelligence was being used by society as a term decades ago).

And in case anyone things those early years were close - they weren't. The recent years of ai usage is so high, it makes it look like that. si isn't a thing.

You may even be more likely to get a Spanish buyer thinking this means "yes" than you are to get a buyer thinking this means super intelligence.

My question is, why are you trying so hard to make this TLD into a "thing"? Why push it so hard? I don't think there is anything wrong with picking up a few names as a gamble. But it seems to me all your posts are trying just a little too hard to fit the square peg in the round hole.

 

[Jannes]

This is not in human hands, it is superintelligent agent itself that decides which tld it will use.

 

[Name2go]

My question is, why are you trying so hard to make this TLD into a "thing"? Why push it so hard?

Is .si really pushed so hard? Who will listen when hints are shy and silent - or do not happen at all.

People have different mentalities and power levels. So what.

Look at the handful Namepros guys who successfully pushed dot now on Atom. Great performance. To me .now is just another attractive nTLD but this is just my opinion and gives no legitimation to bash.

(Image shows part of Atom´s Sapphire homepage.)

Long live diversity. I am not able to write short postings and get to the point. @Jannes has the ability to solve discussions with one short, surprising sentence. @SLDOptions gives all of his passion to spread his belief. And one well-known domainer made a statement in one word, IMHO: Speculation dot si was registered on Jan 16th by @Page Howe .

Thanks for those Google Trends @NameGroove . Are there different results if you use the term Superintelligence in one word?

 

[NameGroove]

Is .si really pushed so hard? Who will listen when hints are shy and silent - or do not happen at all.

People have different mentalities and power levels. So what.

Look at the handful Namepros guys who successfully pushed dot now on Atom. Great performance. To me .now is just another attractive nTLD but this is just my opinion and gives no legitimation to bash.

Show attachment 269314
(Image shows part of Atom´s Sapphire homepage.)

Long live diversity. I am not able to write short postings and get to the point. @Jannes has the ability to solve discussions with one short, surprising sentence. @SLDOptions gives all of his passion to spread his belief. And one well-known domainer made a statement in one word, IMHO: Speculation dot si was registered on Jan 16th by @Page Howe .

Thanks for those Google Trends @NameGroove . Are there different results if you use the term Superintelligence in one word?

It's definitely not pushed overly hard by most. Just Jason, here and on X. Read his posts... they push a narrative - rather than engage in dialogue.

I'm all for differing viewpoints. I surely could be wrong about .si I've definitely been wrong before - so many times I've lost count. As we all are. That's why I'm all for dialogue and open conversation even if others aren't. Perhaps I will learn something new.

You are correct, the term put together as one word has more interest than two words. however, it is marginal in comparison to AI. Also - the countries where it is being searched are not the sorts that I would suggest are "leading" the way. Seems more like domainers to me... but who knows maybe there is something going on in Ethiopia that I'm unaware of.

There have only been 3 sales since .si became "hot" on X. None are live, and one is already for sale. My guess is domainers bought all 3.

I'm all for a little investing and taking a few names as a gamble is something I tend to do. But I struggle to see any "life" in this extension (yet)

 

[Name2go]

It's definitely not pushed overly hard by most. Just Jason, here and on X. Read his posts... they push a narrative - rather than engage in dialogue. In fact, when one attempts to engage in dialogue on X, Jason blocks and later disparages them (instead of just apologizing or saying "you annoy me").

I'm all for differing viewpoints. I surely could be wrong about .si I've definitely been wrong before - so many times I've lost count. As we all are. That's why I'm all for dialogue and open conversation. Jason has been unwilling to do that (so far). Either way, .si exists without him so I'm happy to have a dialogue with others. Perhaps I will learn something new.

You are correct, the term put together as one word has more interest than two words. however, it is marginal in comparison to AI. Also - the countries where it is being searched are not the sorts that I would suggest are "leading" the way. Seems more like domainers to me... but who knows maybe there is something going on in Ethiopia that I'm unaware of.

There have only been 3 sales since .si became "hot" on X. None are live, and one is already for sale. My guess is domainers bought all 3.

I'm all for a little investing and taking a few names as a gamble is something I tend to do. But I struggle to see any "life" in this extension (yet)

Show attachment 269315

Show attachment 269316

Show attachment 269317

Interesting stats.
The blue color of India matches the huge amount of .si registrations by Indian citizens.
Ethopia must be the agentic rebirth of Lucy.

I agree that the .si aftermarket is non-existent. There are E-Mail offers of a few hundred bucks for the best names on the one hand and marketplace listings of okish one-worders in the six numbers on the other hand.

Early in this thread some guys warned to be prepared of hodling .si for at least four or five years. Could be true.

I believe that more people are sitting in the starting blocks, hidden, than we imagine. It just needs the first snowflake to build the avalanche, a big purchase and website development by a noteworthy enduser beyond Microsoft´s Copilot, best sitting in the motherland of tech innovation. I never imagined the rarity of one snowflake.

 

[NameGroove]

Interesting stats.
The blue color of India matches the huge amount of .si registrations by Indian citizens.
Ethopia must be the agentic rebirth of Lucy.

I agree that the .si aftermarket is non-existent. There are E-Mail offers of a few hundred bucks for the best names on the one hand and marketplace listings of okish one-worders in the six numbers on the other hand.

Early in this thread some guys warned to be prepared of hodling .si for at least four or five years. Could be true.

I believe that more people are sitting in the starting blocks, hidden, than we imagine. It just needs the first snowflake to build the avalanche, a big purchase and website development by a noteworthy enduser beyond Microsoft´s Copilot, best sitting in the motherland of tech innovation. I never imagined the rarity of one snowflake.

It's possible. But the same could be said about any gTLD or ccTLD really. If a large corp backs it with a huge endeavor, it could "king make" a TLD. Hard to place bets waiting on something like that occurring. it seems duplicative to me as well (we already have .ai - so why do we need .si?) The answer is the same reason we have .ai - .com got saturated and too expensive and companies couldn't afford. So .ai comes along... but .ai is nowhere near saturation yet - so I'd agree, if .si is to become something, it's many years away.

I'm really not sure how one bets on a thing like that. I could come up with names for all sorts of ccTLDs. Where does it end? Or begin?

.ml "machine learning"
.dm "deep mind"

and so on... why .si? Why not these? Or why not the myriad other ccTLDs which we could create and give a meaning to? I'm not at all suggesting that meaning couldn't happen - just asking, how can we bet on which it'll be? Are we supposed to buy up .ml, .si, .dm and wait 7-8 years and see? Heck of an investment on hope that society starts using the moniker we hope for the ccTLD.

With .tv, .vc, .io, and .ai - the moniker was always there (meaning society always used those acronyms to mean the "thing"). At least with .gg - that took a life of it's own. Just not sure how you bet on the next one like it.

 

[Jannes]

Sure, television is still called television/TV after color television became widespread, and similarly AI will stay as the umbrella term.

However, instead of common parlance, I think that from our point of view all that matters is 1) how much the word 'superintelligence' is used within the AI industry; 2) those who use it also want to sometimes abbreviate it (à la Ilya Sutskever); 3) startups want simple dictionary words for their businesses and using keyword+.si in their case makes sense, e.g. 'Safer Superintelligence', safer.si (shameless plug).

Of course there's the Google "deterrent" at this point, but how Google treats ccTLDs hasn't prevented some crypto/web3 projects from using .fi domains, for example.

 

[SLDOptions]

Great catch @Name2go with Page,

I want to make this very clear, there is only one race & that is not for Machine Learning, Deep-Mind or something else. The race is for Superintelligence, because this is the last phase in ai evolution.

All current attempts are unfulfilled prophecies & only reflect a glimpse of what will be possible with the arrival of Superintelligence.

Although at times it does seem like I'm forcing a narrative but in honest truth I completely & sincerely believe in this technological revolution which is going to change how we live & work for the good.

Once again .si is hands down the best abbreviation that can be associated with Super Intelligence.

This is my humble opinion.