It's another plan that could very well work, as long as it is clearly communicated. Preferably with a tooltip directly next to the buttons where the precise operation is clearly described.What does everyone think about this idea?
The upvote and downvote buttons are disabled until you have at least 1 public quick reply (e.g., Thanks or Disagree). If you remove all of your public quick replies, then your votes are removed upon removing your last quick reply.
Moving forward, this would mean that everyone who adds or removes points from a post would be represented by at least 1 public quick reply.
Would that be a better solution?
Note: This change would not be retroactive (i.e., it would not affect points that were already added/removed prior to this new feature).
Most proposals have been independent of each other, but we’re trying to find a solid solution, so proposals could be combined.Do these proposals still apply as an option as well, or are they no longer applicable?
The up/down buttons themselves would probably explain, whenever pressed prematurely, that the user must choose a public quick reply first before they can be used.Preferably with a tooltip directly next to the buttons
You could do some A/B testing with several proposals, j/k.We have another proposal, as well, that may work best on its own or in combination with previous proposals, but first we’re looking for feedback on them individually.
Always.Thanks for bearing with us while we figure this out.
It's alredy works or soYou could do some A/B testing with several proposals, j/k.
Always.


