- Impact
- 52
Just picked up reps.tv
Which leads me to my question. In the future do you think people will pay more for non-premium .TV names that are shorter in length as in the case with .com?
I was surprised reps.tv was available. It does have links on archive.org
I'm trying to think of the best way it could be develop and marketed.
It Could be used for sales, politics, a database of who and where people are represented in the TV industry, a gym (one of it's old uses) or just a gossip site dealing with reputations in the tv industry.
What do you think is best?
Thanks in advance for the input!
Which leads me to my question. In the future do you think people will pay more for non-premium .TV names that are shorter in length as in the case with .com?
I was surprised reps.tv was available. It does have links on archive.org
I'm trying to think of the best way it could be develop and marketed.
It Could be used for sales, politics, a database of who and where people are represented in the TV industry, a gym (one of it's old uses) or just a gossip site dealing with reputations in the tv industry.
What do you think is best?
Thanks in advance for the input!






