poll Poll: How should NamePros handle AI-generated content?

[URL Stream]

This poll is a follow-up to the active thread started by @biggie — you can check it out here:
https://www.namepros.com/threads/no-ai-gpt-section.1366768/#post-9484578

 

[VadimK]

The devil is in the details. What exactly counts as ''AI-generated'' content?
There is a big difference between creating a totally artifical topic - shooting idea to ChatGpt and copy-pasting the result to initiate the thread from one hand, and editing your own text for clarity from the other - but both are technically been thru ChatGpt.
I am against the first, but not the second.

 

[AEProgram]

I voted for the third option (Create dedicated sections or threads that are AI-free ) but I think it should be reverse, create an area for AI and leave the rest and majority free of ai.

 

[DomainGemsAI]

We’re testing AI models for domain ranking and seeing how brandability sometimes beats pure metrics — curious what you’ve seen.

 

[Altetra]

The Authors should mark it as AI or mixed/edited by himself later, I do this on my own website when I write blog articles, so that my readers know that it is based on my prompt, edited or my own full clean post.

 

[alop]

Its not like im voting but i voted i got @Bravo Mod Team in head lock


tapppppppppp

 

[URL Stream]

Its not like im voting but i voted i got @Bravo Mod Team in head lock


tapppppppppp

@Bravo Mod Team
Will the resutlts of this poll potentially have any practical ramifications on NP policy?

 

[alop]

@Bravo Mod Team
Will the resutlts of this poll potentially have any practical ramifications on NP policy?

cuzzzzzo probably voted Unsure / No strong opinion

 

[johnn]

You missed one option:
- Allow wife to write contents

Because she is very smart and she can write like AI.

 

[alop]

A warm bouquet of appreciation for the new wave of domain investors joining our forum.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1989385033522819172

 

[LoelrAenor]

vote for “Create dedicated sections or threads that are AI-free”
Creating AI-free sections isn’t about rejecting AI, It’s about preserving signal quality.

 

[Future Sensors]

Poll: Should AI advise you on how to vote and why?

 

[pacifist]

I think there is quality ai answer and shit ai answer. I’d say add ability to flag users that send useless answers no matter if ai or not and reduce their capability to spam with low quality.

 

[NameGroove]

The devil is in the details. What exactly counts as ''AI-generated'' content?
There is a big difference between creating a totally artifical topic - shooting idea to ChatGpt and copy-pasting the result to initiate the thread from one hand, and editing your own text for clarity from the other - but both are technically been thru ChatGpt.
I am against the first, but not the second.

Agree 100% - and this poll has no choice for that, so I didn't vote

 

[Kuffy]

HI - ( post created by human intelligence ).

I voted to ban it completely. AI is not intelligence - it is an analysis of multiple opinions and filtration is subject to political bias. It has no capacity for original or creative thought in my opinion. AI free search engines give far better results, and give you a chance to differentiate between truth and friction (sic).

 

[biggie]

Hi

by the time any decision is made,
it may be too late to get a handle, on it/

imo….

 

[URL Stream]

The devil is in the details. What exactly counts as ''AI-generated'' content?
There is a big difference between creating a totally artifical topic - shooting idea to ChatGpt and copy-pasting the result to initiate the thread from one hand, and editing your own text for clarity from the other - but both are technically been thru ChatGpt.
I am against the first, but not the second.

Agree 100% - and this poll has no choice for that, so I didn't vote

Using AI to edit your own text for clarity is not really what the conversation is about.

Auto spell-check is fine too.

Where to draw the line requires (not so) common sense.

 

[Name2go]

I voted to allow without moderation. Reasons:
- AI is here to stay.
- AI created content with abusive characteristics can be reported, like any other "bad" post.
- Think about non Angloamerican folks like me who often use Google translator. It is AI created content if you interpret it narrowly.

However, I think it would be good if source attribution were mandatory for AI-related content (without translations).

 

[Future Sensors]

Here’s a clean, forum‑ready reply for NamePros.

 

[URL Stream]

Here’s a clean, forum‑ready reply for NamePros.

Show attachment 293248

Here is your carefully crafted NamePros appropriate response template for @Future Sensors post, generated to maximize clarity, professionalism, and positive community engagement. You may copy and paste the following message directly:

" Thank you very much for your extremely generous and highly appreciated contribution. I would like to express my deepest gratitude for your meaningful support and valuable participation. Your efforts are sincerely recognized and do not go unnoticed. I am truly thankful for your time, your thoughtful input, and your continued involvement. Please accept my warmest thanks and highest appreciation. "