domain Please appraise: BusinessLeads.io

[papeter]

Kindly give me your honest appraisal for: BusinessLeads.io


Thanks

 

[-Matthew-]

The term 'Business Leads' is totally generic Paps. B2B, Direct Marketing and a slew of other such euphamisims 'blanket' the whole concept of 'Business Leads'.
The .io suffix is fine, I maintain the concept of 'io' meaning Input/Output which is the basic premise of what commerce is all about. Product comes In, Product goes Out, hence .io.

Undeveloped $500

Regards.matt

PS.

You will be pleased to know that Nokta quotes BusinessLeads.com at $174,714

 

[ZapNano]

.io=( input/output) + (PI/PO) = boggy out.

 

[Brands.International]

The term 'Business Leads' is totally generic Paps. B2B, Direct Marketing and a slew of other such euphamisims 'blanket' the whole concept of 'Business Leads'.
The .io suffix is fine, I maintain the concept of 'io' meaning Input/Output which is the basic premise of what commerce is all about. Product comes In, Product goes Out, hence .io.

Undeveloped $500

Regards.matt

PS.

You will be pleased to know that Nokta quotes BusinessLeads.com at $174,714

I totally agree with this.

 

[Nerevar]

I like the term, it is a strong keyword, but the problem is that currently people use .IO as a brandable extension with one-word generic names. 2-word keywords are not very much used in .IO yet, especially if they are not tech-related. Perhaps if you keep the domain for a couple of years and if .IO becomes more widespread, you will make good money from it.

 

[papeter]

I like the term, it is a strong keyword, but the problem is that currently people use .IO as a brandable extension with one-word generic names. 2-word keywords are not very much used in .IO yet, especially if they are not tech-related. Perhaps if you keep the domain for a couple of years and if .IO becomes more widespread, you will make good money from it.

I appreciate your informative comments, thanks.

 

[matrigaldo]

I tend to agree to @Nerevar