wot Top Member VIP ★ 20 ★ Impact 3,726 Feb 11, 2008 312 views 4 replies #1 http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q="Where+am+I"&btnG=Google+Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="Where+am+I+in"&btnG=Search WhereAmI.in
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q="Where+am+I"&btnG=Google+Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="Where+am+I+in"&btnG=Search WhereAmI.in
htmlindex Top Member VIP Large Portfolio ★ 15 ★ Impact 677 Feb 11, 2008 #2 As a domain hack, WhereAmI.in doesn't really make sense, but WhereAmI.at would. Personally, I don't really see value in this name.
As a domain hack, WhereAmI.in doesn't really make sense, but WhereAmI.at would. Personally, I don't really see value in this name.
dman_2007 VIP Member VIP ★ 15 ★ Impact 90 Feb 11, 2008 #3 The name doesn't work as hack imho. But not looking at the name as a hack, it does make sense and can be valuable few years down the line. Right now, undeveloped for resellers worth reg fee - low $xx imho.
The name doesn't work as hack imho. But not looking at the name as a hack, it does make sense and can be valuable few years down the line. Right now, undeveloped for resellers worth reg fee - low $xx imho.
Basement VIP Member VIP ★ 15 ★ Impact 79 Feb 13, 2008 #4 Even if it doesn't work as a domain hack it sure does sound catchy. I'll say around $30 for this name.
Even if it doesn't work as a domain hack it sure does sound catchy. I'll say around $30 for this name.
wot Top Member VIP ★ 20 ★ Impact 3,726 Feb 13, 2008 #5 htmlindex said: As a domain hack, WhereAmI.in doesn't really make sense, but WhereAmI.at would. Personally, I don't really see value in this name. Click to expand... Interesting comment when you compare the Google results for "in & "at" http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="Where+am+I+at"&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="Where+am+I+in"&btnG=Search More than twice as many for the "in" version compared tp "at" :hi:
htmlindex said: As a domain hack, WhereAmI.in doesn't really make sense, but WhereAmI.at would. Personally, I don't really see value in this name. Click to expand... Interesting comment when you compare the Google results for "in & "at" http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="Where+am+I+at"&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="Where+am+I+in"&btnG=Search More than twice as many for the "in" version compared tp "at" :hi: