NameSilo

domain PCForums.info

Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

slider

It's MACHINE code.VIP Member
Impact
78
I do have plans to develop it, but I'd like an appraisal on the name first. ;) Thanks!
 
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains โ€” AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains โ€” AI Storefront
Bump!
 
0
•••
Hello slider !

PCForums.info is really a good name !
I would suggest you to develop it rather than selling it as a domain name !

If developed , you can earn $XXX but only for the name i would pay mid $xx

Thanks

Olgi
 
1
•••
Thanks for your input! :) Rep added.
 
0
•••
Anyone else?
 
0
•••
PCForums.info looks quite good written down, but the plural hurts it a little and so does the extension... still more than reg. fee I think, low/mid $xx

Developed though... could be something really nice. :)
 
1
•••
I think the .info brings it down, but it is a nice good domain, simple, and striaght to the point, I would say mid-high XXX developed.
 
1
•••
Thanks! Rep added for both of you.
 
0
•••
plural hurts it and .info doesn't fit the name quite well, I have to say mid $xx, but as for the plural, it could be developed into forums directory. Good luck on the sale or development.
 
1
•••
owntype said:
as for the plural, it could be developed into forums directory..
:lala: Didn't think of that! Thanks for the idea, rep added.
 
0
•••
I am not sure .info is the best TLD for that usage. I would go for .com then .org but .net would fit nicely here. Still a good name with excellent potential for development. If I had to put a price tag on it: low $$$. IMO value resides in development more than resale.
 
1
•••
Anyone else? :)
 
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
CatchedCatched
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Zero Commission
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back