Objective VS Subjective Branding for Domain Names

[VURG]

In domain names we can have objective binary (Two Parts) language and subjective ternary (Three Parts) language. My observation is that was a masculine bias in the early days of the internet and so there was a preference for objective language. I am exploring the theory that subjective language has the potential to become more fashionable with younger people as there is a stronger emphasis on inclusion and using relational language to do this. What are other opinions with this? Do objective language domains give higher return on investment? Has anyone seen any data driven evidence that points to a rise in subjectiveness with the modern domain market? I am curious about the potential of a case for rebranding some terms in language to give greater subjective emphasis.

 

[Kyle Tully]

In domain names we can have objective binary (Two Parts) language and subjective ternary (Three Parts) language. My observation is that was a masculine bias in the early days of the internet and so there was a preference for objective language. I am exploring the theory that subjective language has the potential to become more fashionable with younger people as there is a stronger emphasis on inclusion and using relational language to do this. What are other opinions with this? Do objective language domains give higher return on investment? Has anyone seen any data driven evidence that points to a rise in subjectiveness with the modern domain market? I am curious about the potential of a case for rebranding some terms in language to give greater subjective emphasis.

Some examples would help.

 

[Bravo Mod Team]

Has anyone seen any data driven evidence that points to a rise in subjectiveness with the modern domain market?

Maybe this is something that @Atom.com could explore as part of AtomRadar?

 

[bmugford]

I think a lot of the "subjective" nature of branding is related to the lack of affordable high quality options.

Almost anyone is going to take an objectively amazing domain, if they could get it.

However, that is outside the resources of the vast majority of buyers. People are forced to be more creative.

Brad

 

[HotKey]

Too complicated just buy the name if it's in your reach or settle for something that will just do, but bug you for eternity
Just remember anything that jives with younger folks is likely forgettable in a year or two. The good stuff will always be good.

 

[VURG]

Some examples would help.

Thanks Kyle for the prompt

I am very passionate about political domain names. I am an advocate of a multi-dimensional political model as I think that the two party political system will be phased out over the next hundred years due to it being expensive and inefficient.

The particular terms in politics that I have a problem with are centralism & decentralism as I think that decentralism as a term causes a lot of confusion. I have been trying to explore alternative terminology to these terms and I believe that refining these terms opens the door for me to work with domain investors who wish to do business with me.

For the term #Centralism, I have the following:

Objective Term: #Linearism
Subjective Term: #Directionism

For the term #Decentralism, I have the following:

Objective Term: #Clusterism
Subjective Term: #Awakenism

Linearism and Clusterism put the emphasis on the mathematical structures behind the political ideologies. This helps focus on how the brain formats information and so there is a strong objective focus.

Directionism and Awakenism put the emphasis on how relationships are managed within the political ideologies. This helps focus on how the members of the ideologies manage relationships between each other.

I am of the stance that #Centralism and #Decentralism are not efficient and are to vague on the information management and relationship management processes. Because they are vague, this opens the door for unnecessary conflict between the two parties and this conflict is a reflection of the lack of scientific analysis devoted to denotation of the naming of the word.

My gut feeling is that the two sets of alternatives that I show are correlated to the market for the terminology. Rebranding can be very expensive but when done at the right times, there is a lot of money to be made through rebranding. For me personally, I am an advocate of decentralisation because I believe that there is a strong case that the technology has the potential for governments to save trillions of dollars and hence reduce poverty problems across the world. I think that a rebrand could accelerate the work that this technology does and could have profound effects across the world.

I am very interested in different opinions on this as I am of mixed minds with these terms and I see the Namepros community to have exceptional skills at interpreting #NameRebranding challenges.

 

[Kyle Tully]

You lost me at multi-dimensional political model.

Just tell me what names I can make money on

 

[VURG]

Hi Kyle,

I am trying to raise funds for an app. It is a slow process. I often call myself a sloth because I am a long game player. I don't know how long it will take to raise the necessary funds for the app. The app will accelerate political debate on helping people align more efficiently on targeted political debates. I expect political transformation to be faster in small countries with flexible voting systems. Larger countries like the USA operate more efficiently with a linear political structure. The USA has a very rigid voting system that makes it very hard to develop a large spectrum of narratives in politics. In challenging linear political structures, I am challenging the language systems of linear politics. The major issue I am trying to work out is whether scientific objective language or relational subjective language will sell faster. That is why I asked the question here.

I expect that this depends highly on whether people see blockchain technology driving a more objective language system forward or shopping technology driving a more subjective language system forward. My attention is more heavily focused on emerging shopping technology. At this time, I don't have particular domain names that I am recommending. I like the terms #Clusterism and #Awakenism and so domain names related to that may do well but I can't guarantee that as there is underdeveloped work in my campaign and I am still part of a small team. The blockchain campaigns are a lot bigger than my work and so I don't really have a strong case for the efficacy of a rebranding campaign against the blockchain community at this stage as so #Decentralism (or #Decentralizm) domains would have a more dominant narrative in the media for now.

 

[Kyle Tully]

What is the app for and how much are you trying to raise?

 

[VURG]

The app is a political profiling app to split people into 60 different political categories. This is based on 12 financial distribution personalities and 5 legal personalities. (12*5). It asks about 80 political questions to gather statistics to help determine which of the 60 categories best fit the person. It then creates a social media service so that people can find other people who agree on the same political opinions to cooperate together. This allows for highly targeted political advertising (Lots better than Facebook advertising) that can have a powerful effect on introducing higher standards of political discussions that it is my dream that this helps increase the participation of specialised activists to advocate political changes that have long term consequences to governments instead of the rushed kneejerk policies that are common today that lead to increased long term debt of nations. I stand by the view that increased targeted participation in politics helps reduce conflict within governments and countries. It is my hope that this app will help teach journalists how to use more powerful journalism to help improve advocacy for smarter policies in government.

In terms of fund raising, I don't know how much I need. I am a mathematician and not a programmer. I am trying to run a big crowdfunding project in Australia ATM which is more about developing shopping technology. I can't reveal financial details about the crowdfunding project at this stage but I can confirm that it is significantly larger than average. It is my goal to focus on the crowdfunding project and to raise money from the app with the profit from the crowdfunding project.

_____________________________________________________

In terms of your question on potential domain names, it has occurred to me that most people look at blockchain as a tool to raise money. My focus on decentralised technology is to use it for reducing poverty and reducing inflation. (#SavingMoney) I guess this is why I believe that there is a case for a rebranding. A lot of people who are fighting for reducing poverty in the world are fighting against blockchain technology. This is where I believe that my mathematical expertise is useful in helping those who hate poverty to see the merits of decentralisation as potentially the largest political movement of this century that can empower the poor to fight for their rights more efficiently.

In light of this, I have tried to get a list of domain names that may be good to cherry pick now. I take no responsibility on whether they will take off in value. I have built the list of unregistered domains based on the idea that Bitcoin is the king of cryptocurrency and that it may be dethroned by a cryptocurrency that has greater efficiency at reducing worldwide poverty and hence is more popular in the long term. I have used the terms #KingVSQueen and #HareVSTortoise.

I see Bitcoin's popularity running on 2 core arguments being the precedent advantage and the scarcity argument. The hare and the tortoise argument against the precedent argument is based on the idea that bitcoin is all brains but no heart and that the tortoise will win in the end. The idea is that a tortoise cryptocurrency that is built more on heart logistics will end up being more popular. The scarcity argument would be challenged more on the fact that superior mathematical algorithms can be developed to make something more scarce.

I don't have a challenger to bitcoin as my mathematics is more about shopping systems than currency management but I don't have confidence in the longevity of bitcoin and so I keep away from it at this point of my life. I am also not saying that bitcoin won't reign supreme in the long term. The beauty about domaining is that you can bet on domains that make money regardless of whether the king or the queen win in the long term. It is my view that the queen of crypto may not exist today but it may be launched in the next few years.

Here is my list. As said, I am providing the list but take no responsibility of whether they rise in value or not:

kingvsqueen(.)net
kingversusqueen(.)com
queenvsking(.)net
queenversusking(.)com
kingvsqueendebate(.)com
queenvskingdebate(.)com
kingracequeen(.)com
queenraceking(.)com
cryptotortoise(.)net
cryptohare(.net)
bitcointhehare(.)com
bitcoinvsqueen(.)com
superioritydebate(.)com
bitcoinvstortoise(.)com
dethroningbitcoin(.)com
thegreatdethroning(.)com
dethroning(.)net

 

[Kyle Tully]

You are an interesting fellow.

What would be the motivation to download the app? 80 questions is a lot. Each field you add to a survey decreases response so the motivation for someone to complete an 80 question survey would need to be pretty big.

 

[VURG]

It may be possible to reduce the number of questions. It is a bit of trial and error to optimise the number of questions. The app is a #PoliticalPersonalityProfiling app. The motivation is to work towards political revolution by helping people find others who aligns with their political perspectives. Political profiling is in my opinion an utter mess across the world at the moment. It is my dream to use this to help deepen relationships between governments and the community to build stronger democracies. I see Bernie Sanders arguments pointing towards billionaires being the problem with politics but I personally think that argument is short-sighted. I believe that the poor quality journalism is the problem. I see the billionaires being both part of the problem and part of the solution. We need smarter intelligence in governments to reduce the massive amounts of debt in Western Government Culture and this means that we need a smarter population where smarter journalism is the key to the rapid education needed to upgrade government efficiency. I call the transition that democracies need to take #TheEcdysis (Based on cicada ecdysis growth phases) and I think that this transformation may take a few decades. The #LinearPolitics structure that is dominating politics at the moment is unstable. We either have to go multi-dimensional or resort to less efficient hierarchical structures. It is my belief that going multi-dimensional will allow for less poverty and higher quality of life and so that is what I am advocating.

I may be able to give more details of the language systems that I am using when I launch the app and provide a case of which related domain names I believe have potential.