Dynadot .com Transfer Sale โ€” only $10.49, coupon COMSUMMER26

Nissan.com

SpaceshipSpaceship
SpaceshipSpaceship
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

LeeRyder

Established Member
Impact
69
OK guys.. this is something thats been buggin me for a long time. Long before I got into the net.

Nissan sued this guy, Uzi Nissan for the domain name Nissan.com

go to the website and he has more info and the such as to what happened. Im just looking for your feedback seeing your all as close to professional Domain people as Ive found :)

www.Nissan.com

here is the link to the story

http://www.ncchelp.org/The_Story/the_story.htm
 
Last edited:
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Originally posted by LeeRyder
This is exactly the reason why I dont/wont buy Japanese. To them it seems the war never ended. How can you say your a pro American company and do this to Americans?

If anyone dose not think that an American company would do this, you are out of your mind!

Ex:
Ford Exploere & Pinto!

Enron & Arthur Andersen

Dynegy(Attempted to purchase Enron, only eight billion dollars in debt)

Edison Power (California Energy crisis)

WorldCom

ImClone Systems

Adelphia Communications (I can add better than that!)

Shall I go on????? Did not think so!

I am quite sure nearly every American in the forum has been effected, as well as, those throughout the rest of the world.

I worked for "Corporate America" (a corp. that each of you definitely know and likely use regularly) for 12years before starting my own business and saw it in daily practices and policies. This included offenses against employees and the public.

I am not defending Nissan by any means! I agree, the suit is a joke. I just think we must keep in mind that this happens everywhere.


If you get a chance read:

CORPORATE CORRUPTION
THE ABUSE OF POWER
By MARSHALL B. CLINARD
 
0
•••
I hate how people/companies with money feel that they take preference over the little guys.
 
0
•••
The guy's name is nissan so he should be able to use nissan.com that's as simple as it gets for me. Corporate lawyer games should not force anyone to dump a domain that is his real name.

More power to Mr Nissan.

Dave
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I wrote Nissan this:

To whom it may concern:

Just an email to let you know I will not be purchasing the 2004 Maxima that I had had may heart set on. I first went to maxima.com to find information, then I said, OK not their site. So I searched for Nissan, came up with Nissan.com and NissanUSA.com. Now it was obvious which site was yours, and it was also obvious to me which site has been trampled by corporate terrorism. I had enough reservations about buying a Japanese car, sending my hard-earned US dollar out of the country. Now I will not purchase a Nissan, now or ever.

The actions of Nissan against this man and his computer company are disgusting. I'm sure your business hasn't been affected one single bit by the fact that you don't own nissan.com. Actually, I bet it has because people find out what a worthless, dishonorable company Nissan really is. I'm passing the information to my friends, and I've got a few letters to the media to write. Ever heard of Tom Brokaw, from Yankton, South Dakota? I bet you have if you watch the evening news. Used to live right down the street from me. Think I'll send him a little note.

Any response to this letter would be greatly appreciated. Also, please do not waste my time with a general "canned" response.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Terry Hall
Yankton, South Dakota

Received this reply. (And I'm still not buying the Maxima.)

Dear Terry Hall,

Thank you for taking the time to write and express your opinion.

Nissan values you as our customer, thus we would like to share with you the true facts of the case.

As this case is pending litigation we cannot provide extensive comment. Briefly, however, we believe that Nissan Computer Corporation is improperly exploiting consumer confusion for its own benefit and creating ill-will among Nissan?s actual and potential customers. For example, NCC had been linking non-Nissan automotive advertising in its Nissan.com website, which understandably concerned Nissan due to the customer confusion it created.

The Federal District Court agreed with Nissan?s position and ordered a Preliminary Injunction that, among other things, ordered NCC to remove all auto-related links from its website. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed this ruling and held that "NCC clearly altered its website so as to capitalize on the "initial interest confusion" of consumers who visited the websites looking for [Nissan's] products."

More recently, the Federal District Court found that NCC had infringed the NISSAN trademark and stated: "..., the Court finds that the defendant's alteration of the "nissan.com" website in August 1999 to display auto-related advertising and information, indisputably leads to the inference that [NCC] possessed the intent to confuse consumers." (emphasis added.) NCC's effort to cast itself as the victim here is an illusion.

It is our position that NCC set out to profit by confusing consumers. Nissan had no choice but to act to stop NCC's intentional exploitation of consumer confusion and two courts have agreed with Nissan on this point. Now, having been at least partially prevented from confusing consumers for profit, NCC is attempting to disparage Nissan, and has altered its website in support of this effort.

Nissan is confident that its consumers will see through this disturbing effort, which has nothing to do with the very high quality automobiles that Nissan is very proud of delivering to its customers throughout the US and the world. Nissan plans to continue delivering quality products, acting to eliminate consumer confusion to the greatest extent possible, and insuring that consumers looking for Nissan, the automaker, know where to find us.

We hope that this information has helped, but if you need any additional information or have further questions, please let us know by reply e-mail or by calling 1-800-647-7263 and pressing "0" for a live operator.

At Nissan, we are committed to a high level of customer service.

Sincerely,

Nissan North America

NCC infringes upon the Nissan trademark??? They should sue Uzi again and force him to change his last name too! :lol: "NCC is attempting to disparage Nissan, and has altered its website in support of this effort." Visit http://nissan.com and see if they've done that. Nissan Motors has lost 110% of the respect I ever had for it.
 
0
•••
I agree he should get to keep the name but you have to take a look at where Nissan is coming from.

If Uzi was only using the site to sell his goods and services there would be no case for Nissan Motors. However, because he was using the Nissan name to sell (or link to places that sell) automotive vehicles and equipment he was intentionally misleading the public and taking advantage of Nissan Motors 'fame'.

I do feel that the ruling is injust. What should've been done is a ban on advertising or linking to sites that sell automotive vehicles, parts, etc. Thus, eliminating the confusion.

Nissan has a point, but there point isn't strong enough to justify taking away the Nissan.com domain - it is strong enough to ban advertising for other automotives on his site.
 
0
•••
Jeanco I agree 100% with your post.
 
0
•••
very much like the mikerowesoft.com site
 
0
•••
lookfindgo said:
I followed this story, the guy is right nissan motors is wrong. Waste of Court time. They should go worry about building better cars than chasing this guy

Actually, they build GRRREAT cars, IMO. Both low end and high end as well as in the middle. I love Nissan cars.

But I agree. This has been going on for too long and it is obvious, I think, to the average person that Nissan Motors is not right to call this guy a cybersquatter or a TM infringer in anyway let alone try to
get millions from him and ruin his life as a result. The guy's last name is Nissan and he was faster to register it for his own business that used his last name BEFORE Nissan Motors was Nissan at all.

I don't even care if Mr. Nissan registered the domain after they changed Datsun Nissan or if Mr. Nissan did not own a business using his last name. The fact is that it IS his last name and he was faster and had more vision of the future to register the name - HIS LAST NAME.

If corporations are allowed ot sue over TM infringements, then I say that people should be allowed to sue over family name infringement. If soemone starts a company called Smith's cars and Smith is not the last name of the founding principl(s), then any and all people with the last name smith should be allowed to stop them from using the last name for a fictitious business name. OK. Smith is a bad example but you get the idea. Ferrari would have been a better example.

Only in a just world would this be the case. But since we do not live in an even remotely just world...

money talks and the US government favors big corporations over anything, even the well-being and prosperity of it's own citizens. Perhaps all governments are the same but this is the only one I live under and pay taxes to.

jstep said:
very much like the mikerowesoft.com site

Actually it is nothing at all like that because, among many other things, the kid's name is Mike Rowe, not Mike Rowe Soft or even Mike Rowesoft nor is the domain or name related to the kid's personal business before or after MicroSoft came along.

Quite different case altogether.

This one is even more of a stupid lawsuit, though, because there is no way in hell that mikerowesoft.com would ever be confused or mistyped for microsoft.com. No way in hell. Microsoft owning such a domain would never benefit the company nor would the kid owning it do any harm to the company. It was a worthless case, MS ended up shelling out a coule thousand for the domain ( I think ) in a settlement from what I hear. This case also reinforces my theory of our nasty government and judicial system (above).
 
0
•••
Man, can't someone OWN a domain name. I say the first person to get it gets it.
 
0
•••
wasnt there the case just a few years ago where enom offered this guy who had enom .com alot of money for his name , and his last name was enom. Mr. Enom then took the money over a 100.000 i think, forgot waht it was.
 
0
•••
ever thought of nameing your child by seeing if the name is available in the .com version
example hey honey lets name our new baby boy George,,, no we cant its already regged by someone ok lets name him georgeos ... well honey dont you think the child will get teased at school sounds like gorgeous!!, ok how about lets name him george1111 ,, look honey its available in .com .net .us and .info
 
0
•••
Appraise.net
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
DomDB
NameFit
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back