- Impact
- 15
Neeley v 5 Federal Communications Commissioners, et al, (5:14-cv-05135)
This 23-page complaint is filed as a paid case in the United States Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
The elderly prior judge and all Article III judges who on in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals or are on the Supreme Court and exceed the age of 7o are listed along with Commissioner Tom Wheeler of the FCC.
The complaint also names "Honorable Denny Chin" from the Southern District of New York for his fair-use Google Inc books mistake as well as the U.S. Attorney General along with Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation for maliciously violating communications privacy laws exempted from 47 U.S.C. §230.
Docket mirror: http://master-of-photography.us/theendofpornbywire/ or via http://TheEndofPornbyWire.org
The attached exhibits were mutilated by the United States Court for the Western District of Arkansas but are available online as follows.
Complaint and exhibits in color (with naked images):
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/execute?proceeding=14-28
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/execute?proceeding=13-86
http://www.scribd.com/collections/4506920/5-14-cv-05135
Complaint only:
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2434364
http://www.lulu.com/shop/curtis-neeley/514-cv-05135-complaint/paperback/product-21620438.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/223673331...ation-of-Rights-of-a-Parent-and-Visual-Artist
https://www.namepros.com/attachments/complaint-pdf.5853/
This completely NEW lawsuit does not seek any copy[rite] violation and does not involve Namemedia Inc.
The prior offer to settle for 5-million by Google Inc that was rejected is mentioned in this complaint. on page 8.
http://master-of-photography.us/theendofpornbywire/index.html#8
5. Google Inc admitted this human right violation as wrong and ceased this violation and offered 5 million in a phone call, now denied, after the District Court bias was certified by calling (5:12-cv-5208) Dkt#53-3 and (5:13-cv-5293) Dkt. #1 “identical in almost every respect”. This claim is a judicial FRAUD and an injustice now plead.
From the bottom of page 12 the following fact is reported.
5. When potentially “indecent, obscene, or profane” communications are broadcast by wire, these broadcasts may also be received via Wi-Fi radio making ALL “indecent, obscene, or profane” [sic] “Internet” communications illegal for return to ANY anonymous public making Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars in organized criminal proceeds.
The FCC released a NPRM last week on 5-15-2014 that apparently plans continuing to not regulate [sic] "internet" as a common carrier and plans to continue to allow some (e.g. Google Inc and Netflix) to purchase priority access to searchers as is described as wrong in my lawsuit on Page 17 as follows.
4. The interconnected wires now used for [sic] “internet” wire communications are exactly the same type wire communications used when US President James Buchanan and Queen Victoria exchanged telegraph wire messages on August 16, 1858. Had there been interconnected networks of wires in 1858; Every interconnected telegraph apparatus would have received the same wire communication via the interconnected common carrier medium of wire. [sic]“Internet” communications should have always been subject to Title II regulation by the FCC even when called a “[holy] new medium”.
The sky is falling!
Well; The sky is not falling but has always been on the ground all around us. People (e.g. Defendants) are now being asked to realize unregulated [sic]"internet" wire communications have been illegal since long before Al Gore invented [sic]"internet" wire communications" and before these were disguised as [sic]"internet" in 1997 by a senile oligarch addicted to pornography. See Reno v ACLU, (96-511)
This 23-page complaint is filed as a paid case in the United States Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
The elderly prior judge and all Article III judges who on in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals or are on the Supreme Court and exceed the age of 7o are listed along with Commissioner Tom Wheeler of the FCC.
The complaint also names "Honorable Denny Chin" from the Southern District of New York for his fair-use Google Inc books mistake as well as the U.S. Attorney General along with Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation for maliciously violating communications privacy laws exempted from 47 U.S.C. §230.
Docket mirror: http://master-of-photography.us/theendofpornbywire/ or via http://TheEndofPornbyWire.org
The attached exhibits were mutilated by the United States Court for the Western District of Arkansas but are available online as follows.
Complaint and exhibits in color (with naked images):
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/execute?proceeding=14-28
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/execute?proceeding=13-86
http://www.scribd.com/collections/4506920/5-14-cv-05135
Complaint only:
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2434364
http://www.lulu.com/shop/curtis-neeley/514-cv-05135-complaint/paperback/product-21620438.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/223673331...ation-of-Rights-of-a-Parent-and-Visual-Artist
https://www.namepros.com/attachments/complaint-pdf.5853/
This completely NEW lawsuit does not seek any copy[rite] violation and does not involve Namemedia Inc.
The prior offer to settle for 5-million by Google Inc that was rejected is mentioned in this complaint. on page 8.
http://master-of-photography.us/theendofpornbywire/index.html#8
5. Google Inc admitted this human right violation as wrong and ceased this violation and offered 5 million in a phone call, now denied, after the District Court bias was certified by calling (5:12-cv-5208) Dkt#53-3 and (5:13-cv-5293) Dkt. #1 “identical in almost every respect”. This claim is a judicial FRAUD and an injustice now plead.
From the bottom of page 12 the following fact is reported.
5. When potentially “indecent, obscene, or profane” communications are broadcast by wire, these broadcasts may also be received via Wi-Fi radio making ALL “indecent, obscene, or profane” [sic] “Internet” communications illegal for return to ANY anonymous public making Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars in organized criminal proceeds.
The FCC released a NPRM last week on 5-15-2014 that apparently plans continuing to not regulate [sic] "internet" as a common carrier and plans to continue to allow some (e.g. Google Inc and Netflix) to purchase priority access to searchers as is described as wrong in my lawsuit on Page 17 as follows.
4. The interconnected wires now used for [sic] “internet” wire communications are exactly the same type wire communications used when US President James Buchanan and Queen Victoria exchanged telegraph wire messages on August 16, 1858. Had there been interconnected networks of wires in 1858; Every interconnected telegraph apparatus would have received the same wire communication via the interconnected common carrier medium of wire. [sic]“Internet” communications should have always been subject to Title II regulation by the FCC even when called a “[holy] new medium”.
The sky is falling!
Well; The sky is not falling but has always been on the ground all around us. People (e.g. Defendants) are now being asked to realize unregulated [sic]"internet" wire communications have been illegal since long before Al Gore invented [sic]"internet" wire communications" and before these were disguised as [sic]"internet" in 1997 by a senile oligarch addicted to pornography. See Reno v ACLU, (96-511)