Little, eensey weensey Problem - NOT ... well, sorta. lol - 10 NP$ REWARD

[user-7256]

Hi,

http://www.DomainTops.com

Thanks to several people's help, the design is nearly 100% CSS and works GREAT. Except for one thing.

The navigation on the side does not meet the height of the content. As you can see, the image and footnote go past the bottom gradient.

Making the height of the page at least 100% would be great too.

10 NP$ to the one who figures it out.

Thanks,
-Matt

 

[def1]

it looks perfectly fine here

 

[lemmin]

Your problem is obviously FireFox. :p

 

[DJ-Sound]

looks fine here, on both firefox and ie

 

[slantednet]

looks fine here, on firefox

and I love the woman and her phrase

 

[user-7256]

Grrr... I will NOT open a site with its compatibility loyal only to IE. It must work for Firefox.

Thanks for pointing out it works in IE, but in Firefox the footnote is PAST the bottom gradient (the one that goes across the bottom) and the image is on TOP of that gradient.

I'll post a screenshot if I have to, but this MUST be fixed. Remember the reward! ^_^

 

[lemmin]

I just looked at the code. That is the craziest way to align pictures ive ever seen. Is it a common thing for people to align things with css styles?

I can almost gaurentee that it will work in both browsers if you just put all that in tables. It's so much less work even, I would think.

Of course, I can gaurentee you anything you want

 

[user-7256]

O.O Have you not read or heard about CSS? They recommend it over tables

Please post only if you know what you're talking about... no offense lemmin... just wanna make sure you're educated on the subject first ...

www.w3.org

 

[Rowan W]

Honestly, I don't think there's a problem with the way it looks now. I'm glad everything's working fine.

 

[lemmin]

I'm not educated on it because 'they' say CSS is better? I keep asking questions about why certain things are better than other in these forums (like FireFox or IE), but no one answers me.

I look at them both, I see no difference accept that tables might confuse some people that are typing them out in notepad. That doesn't bother me.

Please post only if you know what you're talking about

Please quote the part of my post that I didn't know what I was talking about, I think your post was a little harsh on me for no reason.

 

[user-7256]

Well, Lemmin, nothing personal and as I said, no offense, but CSS is the recommended method nowadays for professional coding. I want this to be done professionally. Besides, I've spent NP$ and Rowan has put lots of hard work into making it look great in CSS. This just happens to be 1 little error

Wow, I can't believe you guys don't see it. HERE - SCREENSHOT:

Sorry if I seem rude, but it's been a long, 95 degree day :p

 

[Brian]

Using CSS to do everything uses less bandwidth, and makes it easier to change the style of your webpage without having to update 100's of pages because you hard coded everything in with tables. That is why CSS is better.

About your problem after I eat dinner if no one has helped you out by then, i will take a quick peek around and see if i can see the problem, its probably the container div, that is my guess without looking at a lot of code at the moment.

 

[user-7256]

Okay. Thanks brian!

 

[BurninDragon08]

The site looks perfect to me. I really don't see anything wrong.