FirstDomainer.com
Established Member
- Impact
- 175
Purchased 3 two word libra .COM domains today. What are your thoughts and suggestions? Well, fingers crossed !!
Apart from that, who is going to buy these names, let's assume that Facebook doesn't hunt them down and feels cool about it?
This is no different from owning a domain name with just one end user which in this case is Facebook and if they decide not to buy them, you are on your own holding the bag
3rd party developers are already building on these domains. You can find some here:Apart from that, who is going to buy these names
..and they are actually mentioning Facebook's Calibra on their site, seriously, how dumb can people be
If people are not going to take legal advice from an expert like jberryhill, then you really will never learn.
The sad thing is, 99% of the libra names on here are not worth registering anyway.
You can try and justify it all you want but I think you know whats right and wrong.
Yeah there’s 10s of thousands of bitcoin domains an$ no ones complaining ,every time someone punches up Libra fb get more exposureYou're attempting to ride on fb's tm?
Try to always include source of your informationFacebook warns investors that Libra digital currency may never see the light of day
Better go for crypto specific one. Because i feel there will be crypto revolution if not bitcoin or libraLibraKnowledge.com
LibraAbility.com
LibraWinner.com
I like "invested"... it assumes a return whereas 'purchase' does not.*purchased
what NO ?
not legal ?You're attempting to ride on fb's tm?
Invested?that's exactly why I invested in them . Had it been illegal, there wouldn't have been thousands of registrations made already !! But the question is , IS IT HERE TO STAY ?
Why do you think of it as a joke ?Libra is joke, betrer you have tried getting some other good two word .com
I was thinking of registering LibraAce.com .. you purchased it . Good luck!!LibraLinked.com
Libraace.com
he doesn't mention domains or .com in the long post...The co-creator of Libra (and Calibra project leader) himself is literally tweeting out Libra-related domains + a good few $$$$ acquisitions later and we are still having this conversation based on misunderstanding a trademark...
See https://www.facebook.com/notes/david-marcus/libra-2-weeks-in/10158616513819148/
he doesn't mention domains or .com in the long post...
I agree. I had that same thought. I think if they owned LibraWallet.com or LiobraCasino.com, they wouldn't be so outspoken against it.Well said!
I think the nay-sayers are the one's who didn't register a good libra domain in time tbh
What do you say about the lead engineer promoting developed 3rd party websites with the term Libra? How would you explain his promotions of domains with the term?
https://twitter.com/davidmarcus/status/1146090206904250374
i suggest you take the time to visit the Libra website before making sweeping statements. If you go there you you will see organizations not affiliated with the Libra association using Libra in there interaction with the Libra team.
This is one. They are creating a Libra education platform. They are NOT part of the Libra team
https://community.libra.org/u/edulibra/summary
Here is there website
Notice the domain name?
edulibra.org - education platform on libra blockchain
I agree with your premise that there is still alot to be settled. The dust needs to settle to see where everything stands.There are many unknowns.Very simple answer .. he's a tech guy who doesn't know about trademarks. On top of that, he has ZERO authority on the matter.
Specifically since the Libra Foundation isn't even really set up yet. Rest assured when they do, they will have a legal department.
Above that .. there are still legal fights on if they can even use the trademark world wide .. there are several strong conflicting trademarks they need to address. Don't count out a final name change just yet (although they do have the $$$ to buy their way out).
Again .. trademarks are mainly "usage" based .. so if you have inactive domains you're definitely safe for a while .. but no serious startup will ever end up with Libra in their name unless they get direct permission from the Libra Foundation (AND any other potential Libra trademark holders).
Particularly if the Libra Foundation settles with the other global trademark holders, any other company that has Libra in the name will need to get authorisation fromthe Libra Foundation AND all the other trademark holders.
There are open source and virtually pre-concept .. quite a ways off from having anything made. If you look at the dialog you'll see quite clearly it's just a couple of guys with an idea. Less than basic.
At the end of the day, because most people don't understand trademarks, there will be plenty of Libra sales between domainers at the start .. hopefully you get lucky and sell for more than you buy ... but the end user sales will be very sparse .. even less so after (IF) Libra gets going.
The Libra Foundation has recently filed a Trademark application for the term 'Libra'. It is unknown if it will be granted or the extent of contention it will receive. The TM application may end up being a contentious issue with the regulatory agencies and law makers that are questioning the Libra roll out.I'm just trying to understand this whole Libramania. When I hear some partners talking about being careful getting " Libra related domains" because of possible future trademark infringement etc...I ask myself: Does this mean that the LIBRA FOUNDATION might POSSIBLY" trademark the name LIBRA. Is that what is going on over here? If so, can the name LIBRA be trademarked? Isn't LIBRA an astrologicalL sign in the zodiac that exists I believe 2,000 years before this FB Libra project and that is used billion of times around the world or the future issues could be just about using the name Libra + Stable coin terminologies? Any light???
The Libra Foundation has recently filed a Trademark application for the term 'Libra'. It is unknown if it will be granted or the extent of contention it will receive. The TM application may end up being a contentious issue with the regulatory agencies and law makers that are questioning the Libra roll out.