- Impact
- 40


I agree Chris VirtueChrisVirtue said:
You've got to be kidding, right? A sale of only a hundred bucks would be a good deal?? I think you're underestimating the value of this nice premium domain by a long shot. Most three letter domains are a bunch of jumbled up letters that mean absolutely nothing. This is a nice meaningful domain that could be worth easily 4 or 5 figures.
The name fits the extension perfectly and would be ideal for a holiday religion group to build a television show or telethon around. A show called "JOY" would be a great name for the holiday season. The possibilities of such a name are endless and to see you appraise it at $100 is an insult to the name and AmCy.
:imho:
Qwert said:And more outrageous, I wanted to try and trade all my crap for espana.tv, and they are trying to charge 5k for it.
ChrisVirtue said:
You've got to be kidding, right? A sale of only a hundred bucks would be a good deal?? I think you're underestimating the value of this nice premium domain by a long shot. Most three letter domains are a bunch of jumbled up letters that mean absolutely nothing. This is a nice meaningful domain that could be worth easily 4 or 5 figures.
The name fits the extension perfectly and would be ideal for a holiday religion group to build a television show or telethon around. A show called "JOY" would be a great name for the holiday season. The possibilities of such a name are endless and to see you appraise it at $100 is an insult to the name and AmCy.
:imho:
collieri said:Im still in shock myself... Especially when you see those verisign loonies trying to charge $1m a year for news.tv. And where's the consistency with watch.tv (ok a great name) at $25k a year and joy.tv at $29 a year? i know theres a difference in quality between the names though nowhere near that.
snoop said:I don't see the logic arguing value based on the "asking price" of other names, they only ever had one sale at that level and that was sex.tv during the .tv boom, even then the buyer ended out suing the .tv corp to try and get the money back.
snoop said:I don't see the logic arguing value based on the "asking price" of other names, they only ever had one sale at that level and that was sex.tv during the .tv boom, even then the buyer ended out suing the .tv corp to try and get the money back.
knarfmusik said:PS- Joys.tv is is premium name at www.tv for $200 a year. I think they made a royal boo-boo and let Joy.tv slip through the cracks!! Surely, in this case, singular would be much more valuable than plural. I bet they would have asked $500-$1000 for it, if they would have not slipped. IMHO
Frank
knarfmusik said:Maybe they don't sell a lot of .tv's yet, but when we have had a member of NamePros.com sell a .tv, Plasma.tv,or what was it $25,000??, to me it seems to be worth to own a name like Joy.tv, and speculate on others!!
How much did you sell it for, Argos? (Plasma.tv)
snoop said:$40-$100
AmCy said:OK. Thanks for your comments. That's probably how much it's worth to you, but I think it has much more value to others. We'll see.
AmCy
snoop said:$40-$100
collieri said:What is this b*...?
There are just so many possibilities
Even this e.g. http://www.joytv.org/
Imagine the call "Hi, I have the name joy . tv and wondered if you would be interested in buying it" - "Well, we dont have that much money im afraid" - "How does $40 sound" - "Oh, ok, i'll get my purse.."
Dont make me laugh, $40.... : :bah:
snoop said:Why didn't they register it then, the name has been available for years.



