This doesn't sway me much. You along with a couple of others on here seem to believe that the reason this thread is decidedly negative towards Adam has everything to do with the people posting and nothing to do with Adam. That suggests to me that you're overlooking something pretty fundamental.
Go to Amazon and click on virtually any product and you're likely to find harshly critical reviews. Does that mean that the marketability of those products has been "destroyed" by those reviewers? Clearly not since people continue to buy those products. Obviously, what makes it possible for those products to survive the harsh criticism is the existence of other reviews from customers that are happy with their purchase.
So where are Adam's happy customers? Why do you suppose it is that we haven't heard from bunches of people saying "look at the wildly successful site that Adam created for me"? Has there even been a single person saying such a thing? Does it make more sense to believe that the only customers that have heard about this thread are his unhappy customers, or would you think it more likely that the absence of positive reviews tells us something meaningful about how Adam conducted his business?
The point I'm making is that you're trying to impose an artificial neutrality on this story that is inconsistent with the facts. If Adam had run his business in a responsible and ethical manner then there'd be no need for you to come here and scream for fairness because there would have been a balance of positive reviews to offset the negative ones. So who is to blame for the fact that that hasn't happened?
WOW. Just to add a little sense to it, you are saying that people who actually had experienced good business with Adam and are happy about it should mention their names and websites
in this thread which has converted into sticky mud? No my friend, these people would prefer to stay away from this ego-reflecting thread so that they can keep their hands and business clean.
Do you really expect from those people to share their names and business websites here in front of few people here who only have a mentality to bring a man down and that's what this thread has now become?
I see no new victims and no new claims, it means something has been done to resolve the issues.
They say the purpose of this thread is to help, so
they should be happy now; right? But wait, what are
they doing now in the meantime?
They are bringing new things up to question the credibility of the person in question.
You tell me, isn't that derailing the thread from the original topic? Isn't that not something that would distract the new readers from the original issue? Isn't that necessary to bring new issues up when the original issue still has victims here?
And
@Domain Truth I don't blame you for your attitude. I believe now that people like you who starts calling names to others are the people who have no constructive or helpful comments to share in this thread, now you are not even representing your own case well because I guess you are all out of facts. So I would suggest you to carry on with what you are good at, i.e. name people whatever you like, if it comforts your ego.
No one is damage controlling here, no one is hijacking the thread, no one is going off-topic here, no one is defending Adam for his wrong doings, it's only you and few others who want to keep this thread alive without any purpose; even when you guys have no facts left to flame out.
