NameSilo

Harry Potter Goblet Of Fire

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

-MGS-

Established Member
Impact
7
Well hay guys, have just got back from the cinema! I have just seen “Harry Potter Goblet Of Fire” And what can I say?…. Not the best film! I was so eager to go and see the film and had such anticipation of the film and it let me down!

The film itself does not follow the style of the book in many ways! We do not see many scenes that are in the book! As it was put in a paper, you would have had to have to read the books to know what going on! They miss out a lot of information which is need to make HP4 a good film!

The film itself did not use the same layout as the 3rd HP film! Different locations, different forbidden forest and what the hell are bridges doing in the films! Its not even in the books! So why do they add it? Try to see it in a box set will not work, it is so different from all the others! Most of the people in the cinema said it was the worst one yet!

The film had good animations but was let down by the film itself, poor quality. The film was not what I expected and was the worst Harry Potter film yet!

So what you must say now is, “should I go and see it”?

If you are you must read the book so you know whats going on!
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
ipodman said:
Welll staying true, i am going to go and see it again!!! And am taking my book with me!


noooooo!!! you'll be disappointed if you do....:(
 
0
•••
I've read all of the books, I thought the movie was quite good and included most major scenes :D
 
0
•••
John Malinowski said:
I've read all of the books, I thought the movie was quite good and included most major scenes :D
yeah.. .RIGHT

I just went to see it and I was VERY dissapointed.. I read the whole book last night and it skips about 50 pages of the start out.. starts at the damn burrow and you don't see the whole quiddich world cup.. where the hell was winky or dobby and dobby gives the gillyweed to harry , NOT neville.. so much dissapointment :( .. waste of time.. I would of thrown popcorn at the screen but there were security guards there LOL.. rating 0.1/10
 
0
•••
majinbuu1023 said:
yeah.. .RIGHT

I just went to see it and I was VERY dissapointed.. I read the whole book last night and it skips about 50 pages of the start out.. starts at the damn burrow and you don't see the whole quiddich world cup.. where the hell was winky or dobby and dobby gives the gillyweed to harry , NOT neville.. so much dissapointment :( .. waste of time.. I would of thrown popcorn at the screen but there were security guards there LOL.. rating 0.1/10

someone else who is one my side!
I agree with what you have said
and more!
 
0
•••
ipodman said:
majinbuu1023 said:
yeah.. .RIGHT

I just went to see it and I was VERY dissapointed.. I read the whole book last night and it skips about 50 pages of the start out.. starts at the damn burrow and you don't see the whole quiddich world cup.. where the hell was winky or dobby and dobby gives the gillyweed to harry , NOT neville.. so much dissapointment :( .. waste of time.. I would of thrown popcorn at the screen but there were security guards there LOL.. rating 0.1/10

someone else who is one my side!
I agree with what you have said
and more!

yeah I want my money back plus to be paid compensation lol .. well the acting etc,etc wasn't that bad, special effects etc,etc is good but overall its crap because its just not like the book..
 
0
•••
majinbuu1023 said:
yeah.. .RIGHT

I just went to see it and I was VERY dissapointed.. I read the whole book last night and it skips about 50 pages of the start out.. starts at the damn burrow and you don't see the whole quiddich world cup.. where the hell was winky or dobby and dobby gives the gillyweed to harry , NOT neville.. so much dissapointment :( .. waste of time.. I would of thrown popcorn at the screen but there were security guards there LOL.. rating 0.1/10


yeah...i was expecting winky to be there and Harry was suppose to like in questioning cause he was at the scene where the Dark Mark was shown. So its like half of the book was only shown in the movie. :(
 
0
•••
yeah and you were NOT supposed to see barty crouch junior conjure the dark mark and its supposed to be in the forest.. and I thought the bumped into malfoy
 
0
•••
majinbuu1023 said:
yeah and you were NOT supposed to see barty crouch junior conjure the dark mark and its supposed to be in the forest.. and I thought the bumped into malfoy


exactly...and where was the caretaker of the land?he supposed to have a scene or two :hehe: and i was also expecting an old wizard dressed in a female muggle outfit...:lol:
 
0
•••
well, if someone does come out and make a 5 Hour movie that contained every scene, then there would be people complaining that it was too long :p
the problem here is that the book is too good and has too many great scenes to make into one movie :)
 
0
•••
majinbuu1023 said:
I read the whole book last night and it skips about 50 pages of the start out.. and dobby gives the gillyweed to harry
Well, you can't expect the movie to be just like the book. There always has to be something different in a movie, if it was exactly like the book then people who already read the book would be bored. They'd already know what would happen in the whole movie.
 
0
•••
Shan said:
majinbuu1023 said:
I read the whole book last night and it skips about 50 pages of the start out.. and dobby gives the gillyweed to harry
Well, you can't expect the movie to be just like the book. There always has to be something different in a movie, if it was exactly like the book then people who already read the book would be bored. They'd already know what would happen in the whole movie.

yeah but they missed the most valuable bits of the story OUT! cmon.. that sucked.. also I didn't expect the inside of the tent to be like that eh?
 
0
•••
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back