NameSilo

Full time job

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

john_karr

Top Member
Impact
444
Hello I know that some of you guys are buying and selling domain name part time but I was wondering what type of work do you guys do full time? Im a Personal Trainer
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains — AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains — AI Storefront
I test chairs for a living. The one im sitting in right now is not bad :)
I work as a database developer for a financial institution. It feels like I just sit all day! Boring sometimes, but my butt is getting good at testing chairs. :imho:
 
0
•••
unemployed, but make more doing nothing than I would at any job I could get
 
0
•••
Dangerman said:
unemployed, but make more doing nothing than I would at any job I could get

Wow i commend you...
 
0
•••
Tivo said:
Wow i commend you...

well thanks, but nothing I'm proud of or anything...would be nice to have some kind of career with prestige, but since I don't have that ability or ambition, for me, the domain thing saved my butt! :)
 
0
•••
PowerUp said:
npcomplete said:
I use techniques in math and physics to design "battle-hardened" distributed computing systems that meet performance and reliability constraints in extreme conditions.

Marc

So, what do you do in layman terms please?

There are a number of hard math problems in designing a distributed system. Many of these problems are in a famous category in mathematics known as NP-Complete. The problems that are related to network and system reliability are in another category called #P-Complete. For example the famous Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) is NP-Complete, and is very hard. The TSP requires that you find the shortest path (or at least a good path) that connects all the cities in a tour, and allows the salesperson to visit each city once and only once while traveling on this path/schedule. There are *lots* of alternate routes when planning a path like the TSP tour of cities, and no real "closed form" solution to the problem that is known. If we were to take the fastest computers on earth, it would still take longer than the lifetime of the universe (using currently known algorithms and techniques) to exactly solve some of the large TSP problems. When we design a distributed system, including bandwidth, server CPU, Memory, routing, Cost, etc., there are lots of things to consider, and in particular there are lots of constraints, like max CPU utilization, Cost, etc. When we add constraints to some math problems they get hard really fast. In fact some problems, as we add constraints to a given system, appear to undergo a "phase transition" or rapid change in difficulty as "constraint density" increases, and finding solutions becomes difficult. This is related to the phase transitions we hear about in physics, where we have a phase change from water to ice upon freezing. In the field of mathematics, there is a subfield known as "combinatorial optimization" that relates to problems like the TSP and other discrete type problems. In some problem categories in the field of combinatorial optimization there are phase changes in problem complexity as we increase the constraints on a system. There are other phase change phenomenon that relate to the way we solve some of these hard problems in math. In some cases thermodynamic models of a system of equations can be effective in finding high quality solutions in a reasonable amount of time. In this thread here you can find a section I wrote about temperature and entropy:

http://www.namepros.com/domain-name...n-differences-between-dot-com-everything.html

Suppose we are trying to design a system that itself is designed to take abuse, for example servers under attack or failing, or network links or routers breaking down. In the linked thread above I mentioned a state density function Ω (omega) that is used to define temperature and entropy in physics. One of the things we can do is study the "distributed design space" and find the number of similar states to the current state of the system, and that have similar computational abilities to the abilities in the current state of the system. It is a thermodynamic argument, where you look for states of a distributed system that have a high density function Ω, or large numbers of nearby states that require minimal disruption to the operation of the system. Perhaps the nearby states are even better in some characteristics like Performance, and/or lower quality in terms of Risk (related to probability of failure of the current operating state), but they are still by some measure "neighbors". It costs us something to add survivability to a system, and it takes time to switch from one state of the system to another (and recovery time is one of the math problems in this real time design process), but in some cases the loss of the system is unacceptable. Some of these hard math problems in distributed system design need to be solved in real time if we want to design a self-healing self-protecting survivable system. (see DARPA Ultralog, I did the state solver for performance/risk etc.). Nature never seems to have too many problems solving problems that are far beyond todays computing, so it is natural that techniques that model the physics of nature, like phase change phenomenon, annealing, etc., might be useful in solving hard problems in math that reflect nature. So most of the last couple decades has been devoted to solving this NP-Complete class of problems, with focus on networking and distributed computing. Not a good topic for a party, but you asked, and it has been a fun career. I may retire soon, but overall I just loved the work... you know math geeks and all...

Like I said, my job is not a good party topic... and you know what it is New Years Eve, and for me it is time to start the party!!!

HAPPY NEW YEARS!!!

Marc
 
0
•••
npcomplete said:
There are a number of hard math problems in designing a distributed system. Many of these problems are in a famous category in mathematics known as NP-Complete. The problems that are related to network and system reliability are in another category called #P-Complete. For example the famous Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) is NP-Complete, and is very hard. The TSP requires that you find the shortest path (or at least a good path) that connects all the cities in a tour, and allows the salesperson to visit each city once and only once while traveling on this path/schedule. There are *lots* of alternate routes when planning a path like the TSP tour of cities, and no real "closed form" solution to the problem that is known. If we were to take the fastest computers on earth, it would still take longer than the lifetime of the universe (using currently known algorithms and techniques) to exactly solve some of the large TSP problems. When we design a distributed system, including bandwidth, server CPU, Memory, routing, Cost, etc., there are lots of things to consider, and in particular there are lots of constraints, like max CPU utilization, Cost, etc. When we add constraints to some math problems they get hard really fast. In fact some problems, as we add constraints to a given system, appear to undergo a "phase transition" or rapid change in difficulty as "constraint density" increases, and finding solutions becomes difficult. This is related to the phase transitions we hear about in physics, where we have a phase change from water to ice upon freezing. In the field of mathematics, there is a subfield known as "combinatorial optimization" that relates to problems like the TSP and other discrete type problems. In some problem categories in the field of combinatorial optimization there are phase changes in problem complexity as we increase the constraints on a system. There are other phase change phenomenon that relate to the way we solve some of these hard problems in math. In some cases thermodynamic models of a system of equations can be effective in finding high quality solutions in a reasonable amount of time. In this thread here you can find a section I wrote about temperature and entropy:

http://www.namepros.com/domain-name...n-differences-between-dot-com-everything.html

Suppose we are trying to design a system that itself is designed to take abuse, for example servers under attack or failing, or network links or routers breaking down. In the linked thread above I mentioned a state density function Ω (omega) that is used to define temperature and entropy in physics. One of the things we can do is study the "distributed design space" and find the number of similar states to the current state of the system, and that have similar computational abilities to the abilities in the current state of the system. It is a thermodynamic argument, where you look for states of a distributed system that have a high density function Ω, or large numbers of nearby states that require minimal disruption to the operation of the system. Perhaps the nearby states are even better in some characteristics like Performance, and/or lower quality in terms of Risk (related to probability of failure of the current operating state), but they are still by some measure "neighbors". It costs us something to add survivability to a system, and it takes time to switch from one state of the system to another (and recovery time is one of the math problems in this real time design process), but in some cases the loss of the system is unacceptable. Some of these hard math problems in distributed system design need to be solved in real time if we want to design a self-healing self-protecting survivable system. (see DARPA Ultralog, I did the state solver for performance/risk etc.). Nature never seems to have too many problems solving problems that are far beyond todays computing, so it is natural that techniques that model the physics of nature, like phase change phenomenon, annealing, etc., might be useful in solving hard problems in math that reflect nature. So most of the last couple decades has been devoted to solving this NP-Complete class of problems, with focus on networking and distributed computing. Not a good topic for a party, but you asked, and it has been a fun career. I may retire soon, but overall I just loved the work... you know math geeks and all...

Like I said, my job is not a good party topic... and you know what it is New Years Eve, and for me it is time to start the party!!!

HAPPY NEW YEARS!!!

Marc

Ah, I see.
 
0
•••
Student :]

Aiming for a business degree.
 
0
•••
I see some full time "domainers" and can't help but ask:

How do you manage when there is no domain sale?

What is your portfolio size?
 
0
•••
Very Interesting Thread.

I Basically own/manage several websites, mainly various Australian online Businesses.

Also i have a good portfolio of domains, add several each week. Though i have Never Sold one name yet. lol. I purchase names to be developed, and would only consider a sale if its to a end-user for mid xxxx or higher.

Also hold a part time contract job for a Publication Company, where i manage their websites. Started out in the online world a few years ago when i dropped out of college and worked for an affiliate marketing network.

I try to do as little as possible though, always have to part ways with work for Happy Hour at the pub.
 
0
•••
npcomplete said:
Like I said, my job is not a good party topic...

Marc

Agree, and I also think this thread is the most boring/interesting and respectable thread I saw in this forum :hehe: and you must be the most smart guy here with a math brain..

Happy New Year!
 
0
•••
I'm a powerplant operator, (full time), and I sell mopeds & scooters online (part time).
 
0
•••
Programmer at a $500 mil company + International Man of Mystery (no kidding!)
 
0
•••
I'm a manager (full time) and domainer (part time) :)
 
0
•••
National Service Fulltime..

Parttime Web Designer
Parttime Domainerr and SEOer
 
0
•••

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back