It's really unfortunate that domainers ignore most of the useful data in USPTO records, because it is surprising how much one can learn by looking for the bigger picture instead of acting on the mistaken assumption that the USPTO database provides binary answers to binary questions.
There is a whole truckload of useful data here:
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=90704184&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
One of the first things to notice about this application is that it is an "intent-to-use" application. Now, ITU's can be filed even if the proposed mark is being used, but it is usually a good idea to have a look at the registrant when you are dealing with an ITU. In this case, the registrant is identified as:
EVNT Platform, LLC,
State or Country Where Organized:
NEVADA
Now, just about every state in the US provides access to their business entity database, and often a lot of that data is free. In Nevada, companies are registered with the Secretary of State, which provides a business search function here:
https://esos.nv.gov/EntitySearch/OnlineEntitySearch
Searching on the applicant, you find this:
Formation Date:
04/13/2021
Hmmm... okay, gee, we have an intent-to-use application filed in May 2021, by a company that was formed in April 2021. Since, unlike goodwill accrued through use, the mere "intent to use" is not assignable from one entity to another, then it looks like there wasn't a whole lot of time for this company to have been sitting around on that intent, and certainly wasn't around prior to April 2021 to do anything at all.
But, here again (and I'm not even going to get into the fact that this is a proposed figurative mark), the best way to find out the answers to secondary questions raised by "some thing I found in the USPTO database" is using Google.
Seriously, I cannot for the life of me figure out why people don't know how to use Google. It's a mystery that is probably going to the grave with me. Simplest damned thing in the world.
Very first result for "e-nft" in quotes on Google is this:
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/ne...ts-NFT-Technology-with-Launch-of-E-NFT-s.html
---------
Vinco Ventures Disrupts NFT Technology with Launch of E-NFT’s
April 21, 2021 08:30 ET | Source:
Vinco Ventures, Inc.
Vinco Ventures’ subsidiary
EVNT Platform, LLC to Bring Full-Scale, 3D NFT’s to Entertainment Market, Businesses, and Global Brands
Bethlehem, PA, April 21, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Vinco Ventures, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBIG), today announces the launch of subsidiary EVNT Platform, LLC. (DBA Emmersive Entertainment), poised to disrupt the NFT Market. EVNT Platform acquired software assets from, celebrity backed, Emmersive Entertainment, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) and will be led by industry pioneers and Emmersive Entertainment, Inc. Co-Founders, David J Kovacs, International Superstar Flo Rida, and Erik Hicks. EVNT Platform will combine the proprietary technology with celebrity audiences to create a revolutionary E-NFT experience.
EVNT plans to bring E-NFTs, cutting edge 3-dimensional full-scale NFTs, to market this summer.
----------
Okay, so, one of the things required to be proven in, for example, a UDRP dispute is that the domain name was registered in bad faith - i.e. that the domain name was registered with an intentional purpose based on knowledge of someone else's trademark (or based on knowledge of pre-launch publicity or insider knowledge).
What problems might this applicant have if, in the future, they wanted to argue the domain name was registered in bad faith by the OP?