Dynadot

budget: above $100 Closed.

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bros

Top Member
Impact
1,347
Closed. Thank you for all the offers.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
I can not send you PM.

It is saying
"Your content can not be submitted. This is likely because your content is spam-like or contains inappropriate elements. Please change your content or try again later. If you still have problems, please contact an administrator."

If you PM me I can give you my domain names. Some of them are currently at bido auction.
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
Added section about 2 word .nets.
 
0
•••
0
•••
I'm looking for high quality (exact match) one word .net domains. I'm willing to pay up to $750 for the right domain. Willing to do also smaller deals.
Update: I'm also willing to look at very, very high quality 2 word combos. But with that I'm most likely only interested if the combo has something like 50,000+ EMS and decent CPC.

Some notes:
-PM me with the price and the domain. When pricing the domain please keep in mind, that despite of looking for .net domains, I obviously consider .com domains to be much more valuable (I think keyword .nets are at the moment about 2-5% of .coms).
-Godaddy domains very much preferred.
-Only real words that get good monthly search traffic.
-The word / two word phrase has to be something which can be used to build a business around it.
-If I don't reply I'm not interested, I apologize if this seems rude, it is not my intention.
-I can pay with PayPal, Skrill and Escrow.com. First and second one are preferred.


PM sent
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
myocardial.net chathosting.net dogsit.net hegemonic.net hostmeeting.net ihatetaxes.net indiapower.net minaj.net mlbticket.net nflticket.net ticketbuyer.net vladimirlenin.net

All Go Daddy
 
0
•••
0
•••
If the price and domain match what I'm looking for, yes.
 
0
•••
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back