NameSilo

China will block .com's for a competive edge.

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
The above statement is just a prediction of mine. Blocking .com's for an unfair advantage over US company's would not be beyond them and it is definitely doable. Verisign does not even have a license to use or sell .com's in China, it was only tolerated. But that might change very soon (effective March 1, 2016)

Research MIIT, the Chinese government organization that regulates the internet and domain names in China. This has all been talked about for quite sometime, long before Google re-organized under abc.xyz (do some research for once). It was also well understood that .xyz and .club would be two of the first foreign registrars to get a license in China.

According to Daniel Negari, XYZ is the only U.S. registrar to apply for a license in China AND coordinate with ICANN about it. While a lot of .com loyalists have been bashing new GTLD's a lot of people have been in the background hand registering cheap domain names. A lot of large .COM portfolio holders already sold out and domain name news outlets are slowly easing on their criticism.

TheDomains was right, it will take an intense marketing campaign by at least 2 to 3 major brands. He mentions the Super Bowl as a good example and if you do some research, that is exactly what's happening.

ChrisRice.xyz
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
I'll admit, you know a lot of the facts. Consider you are inside the xyz box and I am outside. Examine facts, the most important being: China has said that they only registries based physically in China will get accreditation. XYZ is USA based. Knowing that, I assume it will be rejected unless a deal goes down.

Now, I can only guess at a motive here, and don't mean to accuse xyz of anything underhanded, but here is an assumption by me of what is going on here:

XYZ will sell out to China. XYZ has what I believe to be a temporary high number of registrations due to their liberal marketing strategy. I believe xyz is a bad extension. Go ahead, ask real people, explain to them cctlds like .co, .cn, .ws even, and see what they prefer. Keen Chinese are just as adept, they love the shorter extensions! No offense, but xyz lovers are following a baseless marketing ploy blindly. XYZ will go to china, become accredited, but it won't matter. It will fail there just as surely. End users are not going to adopt it. Spend some time reading about what is going on outside of xyz and re-evaluate.

We'll see. For now I am keeping my .XYZs
 
0
•••
TripAdvisor is now providing tourism boards the opportunity to publish more types of content in more sections of the review site to better engage consumers during the all-important travel research phase.

As of last week, destination marketing organizations (DMOs) can buy into a “Premium Destination Partnership” with TripAdvisor to add a tab marked “Official Resources provided by XYZ Tourism.”

https://skift.com/2016/03/07/tripadvisor-gives-tourism-boards-a-leg-up-on-consumer-engagement/
 
0
•••
Feed is an end-user + not a startup

http://feed.xyz

eBay appoints Feed as CRM agency
eBay has selected Feed as its CRM partner following a pan-European review.

The account extends across eBay's key European markets including UK, Germany, along with support for France, Italy and Spain.

We have been tasked with delivering CRM marketing across eBay's onsite and direct marketing channels.


We have been a partner to eBay for more than eight years and the account will be jointly led by our Berlin and London offices.
 
0
•••
Feed is an end-user + not a startup

http://feed.xyz

eBay appoints Feed as CRM agency
eBay has selected Feed as its CRM partner following a pan-European review.

The account extends across eBay's key European markets including UK, Germany, along with support for France, Italy and Spain.

We have been tasked with delivering CRM marketing across eBay's onsite and direct marketing channels.


We have been a partner to eBay for more than eight years and the account will be jointly led by our Berlin and London offices.
Feed.xyz
Has an email address listed at the bottom of their site.....it's a dot com. Well well lol..
Hello@feed-london.com
 
0
•••
Feed.xyz
Has an email address listed at the bottom of their site.....it's a dot com. Well well lol..
Hello@feed-london.com

They just switched from feed-london.com to feed.xyz

Here's another one for you.

Solutions to the digital trade imbalance

Susan Ariel Aaronson 07 March 2016

Cross-border information flows are the fastest growing component of global trade. But countries have struggled to develop a system of trade rules to govern these flows. This column discusses how governments use trade agreements and policies to address cross-border internet issues and to limit digital protectionism. It also provides recommendations on how to build coherent regulation in the near future.

The information superhighway is not limited to any one country. Thus, when we use messaging apps such as WeChat or Kik, download movies from Netflix, or seek a new friend at Ashley Madison or Tinder, our information travels from servers based in one country to computers or mobile devices located in another. Although money may never change hands in such transactions, we have participated in trade by moving information across borders.

Growing cross-border information flows
In fact, cross-border information flows are the fastest growing component of global trade. Using IMF data from 2008 to 2012, economist Michael Mandel (2013) found that such flows increased 49%, while trade in goods and services grew some 2.4%. Clearly digital trade (commerce in products and services delivered via the Internet through cross-border information flows) is booming. Growth in global markets for digital technologies is likely to continue because some 61% of the world’s population has yet to go online (World Bank 2016).

Digital trade has become increasingly important to the US. The US International Trade Commission (USITC) estimates that digital trade in certain digitally intensive industries resulted in a 3.4% to 4.8% increase in US GDP in 2011-2013, while online sales of products and services in ‘digitally intensive’ sectors were about $935.2 billion—or 6.3% of US GDP—in 2012. USITIC also asserts that the expansion of digital trade caused real wages to increase by 4.5 to 5.0% and increased US aggregate employment by up to 1.8% while reducing trade costs by some 26% on average (USITC 2014). Although many countries are gaining expertise and market share, the US continues to dominate both the global digital economy and digital trade. The US is home to 11 of the world’s 15 largest internet business (China is home to the other four). Companies such as Facebook, Google, Yahoo, and Twitter dominate much of the web. Not surprisingly, the US is the key force behind efforts to develop a system of trade rules to govern cross-border information flows (Aaronson 2015b).

What rules can govern cross-border information flows?
But the US has long struggled to find common ground on these rules. Almost every country has adopted policies to encourage the development of digital technologies and firms, as well as steps to protect privacy, enforce intellectual property rights, protect national security, or thwart cyber-theft, hacking or spam. At times, these policies may discriminate against foreign market actors, and in so doing, distort trade. In May 2015 alone, France, Germany, and the UK asked Twitter, Facebook, and Google to pre-emptively remove content considered extremist (Fairless 2014, Hirst 2015). That same month, the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) announced that domain name registrars in China would be forbidden from selling domain names in top-level domains (TLDs) not approved by the Chinese government.
http://www.voxeu.org/article/solutions-digital-trade-imbalance
 
0
•••
Feed.xyz
Has an email address listed at the bottom of their site.....it's a dot com. Well well lol..
Hello@feed-london.com

Type in Feed-London.com and it will forward you to Feed.xyz.

Well well lol
 
0
•••
feed-london.com - they had a terrible domain to begin with. feed.xyz is a cheap upgrade for them, heh, "feed.anything" would have been an upgrade. feed-london sounds like a charity campaign to help the starving.
 
3
•••
Type in Feed-London.com and it will forward you to Feed.xyz.

Well well lol
So they use a .com to redirect to an xyz.
Ok..:P

feed-london.com - they had a terrible domain to begin with. feed.xyz is a cheap upgrade for them, heh, "feed.anything" would have been an upgrade. feed-london sounds like a charity campaign to help the starving.

lol.
 
0
•••
So they use a .com to redirect to an xyz.
Ok..:P



lol.

feed-london.com - they had a terrible domain to begin with. feed.xyz is a cheap upgrade for them, heh, "feed.anything" would have been an upgrade. feed-london sounds like a charity campaign to help the starving

Lol
 
0
•••
Chinese Media Praise Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘Cooperative’ Attitude, Fuel Speculation Facebook Could Be Unblocked In China

Posted by Mark Zuckerbergon Thursday, 17 March 2016
markzuckerbergmarch2016.jpg

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg meets Founder and executive chairman of Alibaba Group Jack Ma (not pictured), at the China Development Forum in Beijing, March 19, 2016.PHOTO: REUTERS/SHU ZHANG
SHANGHAI — Chinese media praised Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg for his “cooperative” attitude with China’s internet authorities during a visit to Beijing this weekend — and some Chinese analysts say the nation may be considering unblocking Facebook, currently blocked by China’s "Great Firewall" censorship mechanism. But analysts said the social networking website might have to comply with China’s increasingly strict controls over online content.

Facebook has been blocked in China since 2009, when the government restricted access to a number of social media sites, including Twitter, amid concerns over online comments on sensitive political anniversaries, and after riots in the northwestern region of Xinjiang, which the government said were stirred up by information spread using social media.

However, Zuckerberg's popularity among young people in China has been growing, both for his efforts to learn Mandarin Chinese, and recently, for his pledge to donate most of his Facebook shares to a foundation for health and education initiatives set up jointly with his wife Priscilla Chan. In 2014, he also hosted China’s internet regulator Lu Wei at Facebook’s offices in Silicon Valley, and was seen with a copy of a book by President Xi Jinping displayed prominently on his desk.

On Saturday, Zuckerberg was given what Chinese media called “a rare meeting” with top Communist Party propaganda official Liu Yunshan in Beijing, where he was attending the China Development Forum. Liu praised Facebook’s “advanced" technology and governance, and expressed hope that Facebook could “work with Chinese internet enterprises to enhance exchanges and share experiences,” according to the officialXinhua news agency.

The visit, which comes as China tightens controls on internet users and media in general, showed that “unlike many foreign business elites who hold old-fashioned prejudice against China, Zuckerberg has been friendly to the country,” Steven Dong, a professor at the Communications University of China told the official Global Times. Dong said this “sets a good example for foreign countries hoping to enter China’s market.”

The paper also quoted Qin An, a Chinese cyber security expert, as predicting that it was “highly possible” that Facebook would be allowed to return to the Chinese market. However, Qin said that since Facebook’s filter system for dealing with “harmful information and internet fraud” was "relatively lax," it would first need to be “improved according to Chinese laws.”

Zuckerberg, who also took part in a panel discussion with Alibaba founder Jack Ma during the weekend conference, did not comment publicly on his ambitions for Facebook in the country. However, he has repeatedly emphasized his enthusiasm for China, and sought out President Xi Jinping during the Chinese leader’s visit to Washington State last September, asking him for a suggestion for a Chinese name for his new-born daughter. On Friday Zuckerberg posted a picture of himself jogging in Tiananmen Square on his own Facebook page, with the comment “It's great to be back in Beijing!”



It's great to be back in Beijing! I kicked off my visit with a run through Tiananmen Square, past the Forbidden City and...

Posted by Mark Zuckerbergon Thursday, 17 March 2016

Some Chinese analysts suggested that China’s internet market, which has more than 600 million users, was simply too big for Facebook to ignore, with one predicting that the company might launch a Chinese version of its website, one “which subscribes to the country’s laws.” One mediacommentator suggested this might be similar to that launched by LinkedIn in China: the professional networking site’s Chinese version has grown rapidly in popularity over the past two years — though it has also facedcriticism outside China for blocking posts which the Chinese government would consider politically sensitive. Some such posts are now only accessible to users outside China.

Some observers have also noted that China’s social media market is already heavily saturated, and dominated by local giants like social media App WeChat, owned by Tencent, which combines functions of sites like Facebook and WhatsApp. One commentator said Facebook had less to distinguish itself from Chinese competitors than LinkedIn. However, the lack of access to such Western networking sites without a Virtual Private Network connection tool — some of which are also sometimes blocked in China — is a major source of frustration for many foreigners living in the country, and removing it might win the authorities some plaudits. And China's commerce minister stressed at the China Development Forum this weekend that the country was planning to open the economy further to foreign investmentin the coming years.

But content controls may be a sticking point. Since President Xi Jinping took office three years ago, the Chinese government has shown itself to be increasingly wary of an unfettered internet, setting up a new "cyberspace administration." It has also arrested a number of well-known bloggers, and drafted a new internet law which requires service providers to increase censorship of content, locate servers in China and allow Chinese officials access to them when required. It has also called for a global agreement for countries to not intervene in each other’s “internet sovereignty” by criticizing censorship.

China’s leadership has also tightened controls on China’s mainstream media content. President Xi recently asked journalists in official media organizations to promote the Communist Party’s interests at all times, leading to concerns about the future of challenging journalism in the country. Several journalists have been detained in recent months, including one taken for questioning last week, apparently for his links to a website that published a letter calling for Xi to step down. China has also recently restarted blocking access to the website of Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post, which was recently taken over by Jack Ma's Alibaba.


http://www.ibtimes.com/chinese-medi...ve-attitude-fuel-speculation-facebook-2340010
 
Last edited:
0
•••
‘Cooperative’ Attitude: coming from the Communists this is quite an endorsement :p
Joking aside, doesn't he have a Chinese wife ? I also heard he was learning Chinese but not sure.
 
0
•••
‘Cooperative’ Attitude: coming from the Communists this is quite an endorsement :P
Joking aside, doesn't he have a Chinese wife ? I also heard he was learning Chinese but not sure.

Yeah, his wife is Chinese. He has really been going above and beyond to gain China's approval and win points (some people would call it "kissing up"). He was even promoting speeches and books by President Xi in 2015.

He spoke to the President in Chinese when President Xi visited the U.S. I cannot remember if it was in the White House or not but it might have been.
 
0
•••
Seeking Access to Facebook in China, Zuckerberg Courts Risks

Mark Zuckerberg in China.
  • Mr. Zuckerberg, the Facebookfounder, returned to Beijing for yet another trip that drew local headlines and captivated online China. He wrote a post that went viral about ajog through Tiananmen Square; held a widely covered conversation with China’s best-known entrepreneur, Jack Ma of Alibaba; and on Saturdaymet with one of the most powerful men in China, Liu Yunshan, the country’s propaganda chief.
    Video Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook and Jack Ma of Alibaba discussed the state of the Chinese economy at a forum in Beijing on Saturday.
    It followed previous trips in which Mr. Zuckerberg impressed Chinese audiences with his rookie Chinese language skills and spoke about his fascination with the country. Even at times while he was outside China, hemet with China’s president, Xi Jinping; told a Chinese official he was reading a book of Mr. Xi’s words and gave his newborn daughter, Max, a Chinese name. (It is Chen Mingyu.)

    The visits have cemented his place as one of the best-known foreign business executives in China. But it is far from clear whether his charm offensive will unlock Mr. Zuckerberg’s ultimate goal: persuading the Chinese government to lift its ban on the social media service and open it to the country’s almost 700 million Internet users.

    Courting Chinese leaders in such a public fashion is an unusual strategy for a foreign executive. With star power comes influence, and any clout not directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party can be deemed dangerous. China demonstrated this last month, when a widely read social media account of a prominent real estate tycoon disappeared after he criticized Mr. Xi’s call for unswerving loyalty from the country’s media.

    The few American technology firms that have entered China in recent years have played down their efforts. Though Travis Kalanick, a founder of Uber, frequently travels to China, news of his presence rarely spreads across the Chinese Internet. There was almost no fanfare in advance of LinkedIn’s deal with two closely connected Chinese venture capital shops to enter China, an event that was marked with a blog post.

    If Mr. Zuckerberg succeeds, it could show other foreign companies blocked in China that they have a potential path into the huge and fast-growing market — one that calls for them to accept China’s strict controls on discourse and to refrain from rocking the boat. A failure would underscore Chinese distrust of foreign technology companies and cement the idea that the low-profile approach is the only way to gain market access.

Mr. Zuckerberg’s meeting with Mr. Liu — a rarity for an American business executive — underscores the dynamic. Mr. Liu sits on the Chinese Communist Party’s Politburo Standing Committee, the summit of power in China. The meeting serves China’s propaganda purposes, allowing the country to show that one of the titans of America’s new tech-based economy is happy to pay homage to China’s leaders and its style of Internet governance.

If there is anyone Facebook has to win over, it is Mr. Liu, who has for years presided over the controls on China’s highly censored and stage-managed media.

At the meeting, Mr. Liu lauded Facebook’s technology prowess, but he also emphasized the importance of Internet governance “with Chinese characteristics,” according to an official state news media account, a reference to censorship and surveillance within China.

Mr. Zuckerberg praised China’s progress in building an advanced Internet and vowed to work with Chinese peers to “build a better world in cyberspace,” according to Xinhua, China’s official news agency.

Facebook did not respond to a request for comment.

On Friday, Mr. Zuckerberg posted a photo of himself smiling as he jogged past the Mao Zedong portrait in Tiananmen Square. He avoided mentioning both the violent crackdown on peaceful demonstrators there in 1989 and that morning’s dangerous air pollution levels.

During the discussion with Mr. Ma, the Alibaba founder, on Saturday, Mr. Zuckerberg also generally avoided sensitive topics, speaking instead about artificial intelligence and what should motivate entrepreneurs. He also praised China’s emphasis on engineering, saying that he believed it would help solve future labor shortages associated with high-technology jobs.

“In general we’re seeing a huge constraint around the world on the number of good engineers who are graduating from universities,” Mr. Zuckerberg said. “And I think this is something that China has gotten really right by emphasizing for a long time.”

China’s state-run television broadcaster China Central Television posted a social media message that included a photo of Mr. Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, who is Chinese-American. Next to the photo, a cartoon character declares, “A son-in-law of China!”

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/03/2...risks.html?referer=https://www.google.com.ph/
 
1
•••
A Brief History of Facebook’s Courtship of China
5:47 AM ET Updated: 8:38 AM ET
learning some Mandarin, marching through a talk in Chinese at a Beijing university. When Xi Jinping visited the U.S. last year, Zuckerberg chatted with the Chinese President. The Facebook founder has also hosted Lu Wei, China’s Internet chief, who has famously made it clear that any foreign firm hoping to enter the China market must play by Beijing’s rules.

Over the weekend during a trip to Beijing for an economic conference, Zuckerberg continued his China charm campaign. On Saturday, he met with propaganda czar Liu Yunshan. More than anyone who sits on the seven-man Politburo Standing Committee that rules China, Liu decides what Chinese should think, read and experience through the media. A day earlier, despite the smog that blanketed Tiananmen Square,Zuckerberg posted a photo on Facebook of a run he took through the heart of the Chinese capital. Just down the Avenue of Eternal Peace, guards at the gates of the nation’s leadership compound were outfitted in protective face gear. But the tech tycoon wore no anti-pollution mask during his jog. China’s Internet pundits called Zuckerberg an “expensive vacuum cleaner” of toxic air pollution and christened Facebook with a new Chinese name, Fei Si Bu Ke (非死不可), which literally means “have to die.” Facebook could not be reached for comment.

Facebook, of course, is banned in China, ever since 2009 race riots in the nation’s northwest spooked control-obsessed authorities. (Another Chinese Internet meme centered around how Zuckerberg was able to post his run on Facebook while in Beijing: the answer is a cumbersome and often expensive workaround called a virtual private network, or VPN.) The Chinese government is allergic to any digital technology that could be used to organize the masses outside of the authorities’ purview. Websites or keywords deemed politically sensitive are censored. YouTube, Google and Twitter are blocked by the Great Firewall.

In their stead, domestic alternatives—such as Tencent’s WeChat, Sina’s Weibo and Baidu—have thrived. These Chinese services, though hugely popular with the nation’s nearly 670 million-strong digital population, submit to constant monitoring and censorship. A Baidu web search, for example, tends to ignore the 1989 massacre when the words “Tiananmen Square” are entered.

Of course, not all Chinese companies have succeeded because of a lack of foreign competition. Alibaba, the tech behemoth behind online shopping platform Taobao, for instance, demolished eBay, which entered the China market with great fanfare and left utterly vanquished. Uber, too, has failed to grab significant market share from domestic car-hailing services, like Didi Kuaidi.

The development of such local firms is crucial to China’s state-sanctioned efforts to encourage innovation. With the nation’s export-led growth slowing, its central planners want to move the economy up the value-added ladder. Earlier this month, at China’s annual parliamentary meeting, Premier Li Keqiang expanded on a so-called Internet Plus strategy, even as the government has cracked down on the kind of free expression associated with digital disruption. The government’s Internet policy is designed to incubate homegrown firms and discourage reliance on foreign companies.

So how does a Western interloper such as Facebook fit in? The timing of Zuckerberg’s latest China foray is curious. Over the past few months, President Xi has put the brakes on free speech in China. He has advocated a global Internet governance network in which each country makes it own rules, as opposed to a system in which information freely flows across national borders. Earlier this month, the Chinese Presidenttoured the nation’s largest media outlets and reminded journalists that their primary allegiance was to the Chinese Communist Party, not to the people or any fanciful notion that the press serves as a check on a government’s powers. Under Xi’s rule, hundreds of Chinese free-thinkers have beendetained or silenced. In just the latest example, a journalistdisappeared last week, while a retired businessmen and Communist Party stalwart found his social-media account shuttered after criticizing Xi’s media tour.

China’s official news service, Xinhua, characterized Zuckerberg’s meeting with propaganda chief Liu as less of a business deal and more of a courtesy call: “Liu expressed hope that Facebook, which has advanced technology and governance mode, should work with Chinese internet enterprises to enhance exchanges and share experience so as to make outcome of the internet development better benefit the people of all countries.”

If Zuckerberg manages to convince Chinese officials to allow Facebook back in, he will almost assuredly have to accept a version of the social-media service that hews to local censorship rules. Perhaps Zuckerberg believes that Facebook lite is better than no Facebook at all. “China is like the legend of Excalibur to Silicon Valley CEOs, the sword in the stone,” says Duncan Clark, a Beijing-based tech analyst whose book Alibaba: The House that Jack Ma Built, will be published next month. “It’s tempting because it’s so hard. No one has cracked it.” For Zuckerberg, says Clark, “it’s hard to see how Facebook could achieve a meaningful market share as a new entrant in social in China, given the dominance of existing players like Tencent, let alone regulatory issues—managing their China operations to the satisfaction of the authorities in China, without falling foul of public opinion in the West or being grilled by the U.S. Congress.”

Six years ago, Google took a different approach. After the company was put under mounting pressure to censor its search results, Google pulled out of mainland China. Critics sniped that Google was already losing ground to local competitor Baidu. But it’s also true that the U.S. firm turned its back on China precisely at the moment when so many others were desperate for a way in.

This year, Google’s Play, a mobile phone app store, could enter China. That could, in theory, help foreign gaming firms penetrate an untapped market. Yet earlier this year, Beijing unveiled further regulations that limit foreign or joint-venture companies from operating and publishing in the digital sphere. No amount of Mandarin lessons or Tiananmen jogs will change the reality of life behind the Great Firewall. Still, the business of tech can move faster than even notoriously fickle fashion cycles. “In tech, new opportunities open up,” says tech analyst Clark. “Even if existing areas like search or social are dominated by Baidu or Tencent, catching the next wave is a constant preoccupation.” Facebook, he says, “needs to be part of this massive market somehow.”
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Big News: XYZ Reaches Major Milestones in Accreditation Process
To all of our Chinese followers: Big news! We would like to announce we have taken MAJOR steps toward accreditation in China, which is on track for this year. This has been a long process, and we have crossed three of the five hurdles needed for full accreditation in China.

First, a brief overview of the accreditation process (we promise it won’t bore you):

Step 1. The registry must form a Chinese business entity to operate in China.

Step 2. The Chinese business must obtain a Chinese business license.

Step 3. ICANN, the governing body over naming on the internet, must approve the contractual changes to allow registry’s technical solution in China.

Step 4. ICANN then must successfully test the registry’s technical solution in China.

Step 5. Lastly, the registry must apply (through its Chinese business entity) for accreditation through the Chinese Government.

Whew, end of technical talk!

We are happy to announce that Steps 1 and 2 have been completed! We have fully formed our Chinese business entity and obtained our business license, which means that we will be able to operate as a business in China. This is a major accomplishment and the product of nearly a year of hard work. But our Chinese friends are worth it! Check out our shiny new business license:



We have also checked off Step 3. We have executed an amendment to our Registry Agreement with ICANN to operate our registry services in China. We are the ONLY registry operator to receive this mandatory permission from ICANN. That means we are closer to becoming fully accredited than any other non-Chinese new domain extension using a gateway model to operate in China.

With three of the five steps completed, we are now underway with Step 4. Testing is going as planned and we look forward to becoming accredited in 2016. We expect adoption to skyrocket once we receive approval, so be sure to register your .xyz domains now before someone else does! Click here to see a list of CCCC.xyz and LLLLL.xyz domains available now for standard fees, or bid on over 150 .xyz domains that are being sold for no reserve in our exclusive West.cn auction (visit W263.xyzfor English). For more information about the auction, please read our complete announcement here.

Our Chinese partners are also currently offering a special promotion for .xyz domains for a limited time. Act now before someone else snatches up that perfect domain!

https://gen.xyz/blog/chinamilestone
 
1
•••
.COM loyalist just got a shot across the brow. It's not the full news I was waiting for but it is close:

China considers banning all unapproved Internet domains

BLOOMBERG


ARTICLE HISTORY


HONG KONG – China’s government is moving to tighten its grip over the Internet as it rolls out draft rules that will effectively ban Web domains not approved by local authorities, including possibly the most widely used .com and .org addresses.

The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology is seeking feedback on regulations proposing that Internet domain names offering “domestic access” should only be provided by services supervised by the government, according to a notice posted on the regulator’s website. Domain names are web locations such as .net or .cn. Under the proposal, their providers have to apply to the ministry for approval before Web addresses are allowed to operate.

That could allow the government to monitor users’ activity and strengthen its control over what content is accessible, said Lento Yip, chairman of the Hong Kong Internet Service Providers Association, in an e-mail. The government of China, which has the world’s largest Internet population, blocks and filters content from local and overseas websites to keep a tight rein on citizens’ access to information via the so-called Great Firewall.

“The domain name system will work in the background for your every single click on the browser while the Great Firewall blocks outside content,” Yip said. “If this trend continues, we can predict that the Chinese network will soon become a big Intranet, totally monitored by a network ‘big brother. The authority can block all domain name servers outside of China (the Great Firewall) and allow only domestic domain name servers to serve Chinese Internet users requests.”

China employs one of the world’s most exhaustive Internet censorship regimes to suppress dissent and information deemed dangerous by the Communist Party. Social-media posts can be deleted and search terms blocked, and local Web users can’t access foreign websites, including those of Facebook and Twitter.

The ministry didn’t respond to a fax requesting comment on how the envisioned rules could affect Internet regulation.

The government has increased restrictions since President Xi Jinping took power three years ago, passing a security law establishing “cybersovereignty,” making retweets of rumors a crime and advancing regulations that would let companies in key sectors only use technology deemed “safe and controllable.”

Xi made personal visits last month to top state-run media outlets, which were called on to show loyalty to the party.

Authorities are seeking feedback on the draft until April 25. If adopted, the new rules mean that instead of blacklisting specific sites, the government will grant access only to websites that make it onto a white list, said Lokman Tsui, an assistant professor at the School of Journalism and Communication at the Chinese University of Hong Kong who has advised Google on freedom of expression and the Internet.

“This is a serious escalation and from what I can see would be an unprecedented move,” Tsui said in an e-mail. “It doesn’t seem exclusive to .cn.”

China last year erected regulations to supervise domain name registrars that operate within its borders, but the new rules would be the first time it has sought to extend its control over domains themselves, Tsui said. Article 37 of the proposed rules expressly puts domain names under central control by blocking any not registered with the authorities, he said.

The wording was vague, and it is unclear whether websites hosted outside the country and administered by The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) — the quasi-governmental nonprofit gatekeeper for Web addresses — could be subject to the regulations. Yip said the regulations will likely apply only to websites hosted on servers within the country.

“Domain names engaging in network access within the borders shall have services provided by domestic domain name registration service bodies,” according to the rules published Friday. “For domain names engaging in network access within the borders, but which are not managed by domestic domain name registration service bodies, Internet access service providers may not provide network access services.”

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/20...ing-unapproved-internet-domains/#.Vvt71ssRWBZ

Can't say I didn't warn you. It was public information as early as 2015. @Kate @JB Lions
 
0
•••
The title is misleading by the way, what the authorities are trying to do is regulate websites run by Chinese citizens, hosted in China and serving a Chinese audience.

And the regulations are vague as always in China, because they are enforced arbitrarily.

In the meantime Google have started using .google domains lol. I thought they were supposed to switch to .xyz ?
 
1
•••
this is not just new regulations for Chinese companies...

What they're proposing is to block all websites that aren't officially registered inside China with the government = serious stuff.

They could easily do this if they wish but 99% of the internet would be blocked by their firewall... interesting times ahead. Google is already blocked. Maybe this is why Zuck/FB was just recently meeting with the gvnt. Some of the big guys in China probably knew about this and maybe a major reson the big run up in chips and overall domain purchases recently by the Chinese.

Now i'm really starting to think they might actually block all tld/.com/.net and force everyone in China to use the .cn domain. What a crazy place.
 
1
•••
this is not just new regulations for Chinese companies...

What they're proposing is to block all websites that aren't officially registered inside China with the government = serious stuff.

They could easily do this if they wish but 99% of the internet would be blocked by their firewall... interesting times ahead. Google is already blocked. Maybe this is why Zuck/FB was just recently meeting with the gvnt. Some of the big guys in China probably knew about this and maybe a major reson the big run up in chips and overall domain purchases recently by the Chinese.

Now i'm really starting to think they might actually block all tld/.com/.net and force everyone in China to use the .cn domain. What a crazy place.

.cn isn't the the only TLD approved by the MIIT in China. There are currently 14 approved TLDs and besides .top, .XYZ is going to be the first foriegn TLD to gain approval in China.
 
1
•••
yes there's lots of tld's approved at the moment. This may not be the case in the future.

China is turning very nationalistic lately and is doing everything and anything to get away from the US. They are trying to build everything internally to drive a consumer based economy inside China.

What's their end game? Complete control of 'their' internet which is what this new proposal is about and keeping profits inside China. China just a couple days ago introduced a value added tax of something like 17%? on all internet purchases overseas. Does this mean domains will have to be priced 17% lower than the marketplaces inside China in order to sell? maybe.

Currently you have to register your website with the Chinese government and host your website inside China or you could be blocked. There's currently a blacklist of websites that aren't allowed into China. This new regulation could mean you have to apply and get on a whitelist in order to be visible by anyone inside China.... if they go this far, where will they go next? No transfer of domains outside China? Force everyone to only buy domains through a Chinese marketplace and not overseas? force everyone to use a .cn to keep things inside China? If they're trying to isolate themselves from the rest of the world's internet then anything is possible... time to diversify away from the Chinese focus in domaining.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
yes there's lots of tld's approved at the moment. This may not be the case in the future.

China is turning very nationalistic lately and is doing everything and anything to get away from the US. They are trying to build everything internally to drive a consumer based economy inside China.

What's their end game? Complete control of 'their' internet which is what this new proposal is about and keeping profits inside China. China just a couple days ago introduced a value added tax of something like 17%? on all internet purchases overseas. Does this mean domains will have to be priced 17% lower than the marketplaces inside China in order to sell? maybe.

Currently you have to register your website with the Chinese government and host your website inside China or you could be blocked. There's currently a blacklist of websites that aren't allowed into China. This new regulation could mean you have to apply and get on a whitelist in order to be visible by anyone inside China.... if they go this far, where will they go next? No transfer of domains outside China? Force everyone to only buy domains through a Chinese marketplace and not overseas? force everyone to use a .cn to keep things inside China? If they're trying to isolate themselves from the rest of the world's internet then anything is possible... time to diversify away from the Chinese focus in domaining.

Most of this was self evident in 2015 when I started buying .XYZ. I posted about China's intention to block .com in January of this year using this thread. I cannot guarantee that they will follow through on their threats but the odds look good.

It is also self evident that China will not limit their choices to .cn alone. If you want to hear more of my reasons why, please PM me.
 
0
•••
yes there's lots of tld's approved at the moment. This may not be the case in the future.

CORRECTION:
- There are only 14 TLDs approved by the MIIT in China.
- .com, .net and .org are not approved by the MIIT but they are being tolerated for now. I think that will change in 2016.
- .XYZ is close to gaining MIIT approval. I posted the info here.
- .XYZ is the best performing New GTLD.
 
0
•••
It's pretty clear, if you're in China and want to operate a Website it will need to be one of the approved extensions. .XYZ, .TOP, CN etc.. This has no effect on them buying and owning domains that haven't been approved as long as they don't launch a site / business.

The new rules (that are currently out for comment) state that if you want to host a website in China, the domain name must be registered with a registrar in China. But this new draft in no way prohibits the ownership of domains by Chinese registered outside the country.

Article: http://www.circleid.com/posts/20160..._new_domain_name_regulations_allays_concerns/
 
2
•••
3
•••
What a load of rubbish.

China Proposes New Web Rules To Increase Censorship

By Gerry Shih
April 1, 2016 09:00AM

larger-12-China-Censor1.jpg


China is consolidating its ability to censor the Internet by drafting new rules requiring businesses that serve domestic Internet users to register their Web addresses inside the country, a move seen as targeting Chinese companies but that has raised concerns among foreign businesses.

In its most draconian interpretation, the proposed requirements could also further limit access within the Chinese network, analysts said. That appears to be the latest step by the ruling Communist Party to erect cyber barriers in the name of what some officials call "Internet sovereignty."

"This expands control over domestic Internet operators and contributes to the gradual buildup of the capability underpinning Internet sovereignty," said Rogier Creemers, an expert on Chinese media policy at the University of Oxford.

Under the draft regulations released this week by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, any firm that provides services to Chinese users must register its domain, or Web address, with a Chinese provider. The rules are found in Article 37 of the ministry's proposed update to a set of decade-old Internet laws.

Analysts said the main targets appear to be Chinese Internet companies that store their content domestically but keep their Web address registered overseas with reputable, international firms for security purposes.

Requiring them to shift their registration to a domestic provider under Chinese government control would allow censors to react more quickly in blocking access to certain sites, said Long Weilian, an IT consultant based in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen who has blogged extensively on the issue.

"Before, they had to contact the server, get the address, talk to the manager and then ask them to censor something," Long said. "If the domains are all domestic, they can directly stop traffic going to your domain with a command."

Jacob Parker, vice president for China operations with the U.S.-China Business Council, which lobbies the Chinese government on trade policy, said his group was concerned that the rules would block the free flow of information.

"Any kind of restrictions would undermine China's broader economic development goals," Parker said.

Concerned that a borderless, U.S.-led global Internet could weaken its political control, China's government has repeatedly issued cyber regulations that have drawn criticism from Western trade groups. Following pushback from the White House last year, China dropped a provision in a cybersecurity law that would require companies to keep Chinese user data at facilities in China, allowing the government access to personal information.

Questions remain about the new rules' true purpose and how strictly they would be enforced. The ministry is currently soliciting feedback on the proposed registration regulations, and Chinese laws are often softened during the revision process.

Fang Xingdong, the director of a top Chinese technology think tank, said he believes Chinese leaders are seeking to enhance their control, but not to wall China off from the rest of the world.

"Under the current wording, all this is doing is integrating large Chinese Web service providers under a more rigorous supervision framework, while most small businesses won't be affected," said Fang, whose organization regularly submits opinions to the government on Internet issues.

Any attempt to seal off the Chinese Internet "would hurt China as much as America," he said

http://www.newsfactor.com/mobile/?sid=0020006M9QAM&do=story

@JB Lions @Kate
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back