budget: above $5000 Brand name for Secure Video Viewing

[Rob Monster]

Dear friends,

I am looking for another great domain name. This one is for a Secure Video Viewing platform. If you are familiar with the service called HookTube.com, it is a way to view videos without being tracked or seeing ads.

The desired domain will be short (not more than 10 characters) and memorable .COM. The brand name will sound honorable, and of general appeal, not sketchy that implies vice or porn.

For those not aware, YouTube has mastered the practice of codifying videos and tracking very carefully who consumes what video, effectively profiling all users.

For this application, users will be able to login to YouTube via the proxy service and browse their channels as normal but any videos they watch is obscured by an advanced proxy service.

We expect to purchase the domain within this week. Budget is up to $10K, possibly higher for a premium domain that justifies a higher budget and would be a good fit for the project.

 

[vwblubug]

PM Sent @Rob Monster

 

[TLDplace]

PM sent

 

[Domain Sugar]

Message Sent

 

[Nametree]

Sent a few @Rob Monster

 

[Bob Hawkes]

DM sent, but you can probably ignore it - sent the closest match I had in .com. Best wishes for your search, Rob - hope you find a great name!

 

[Rob Monster]

Quick update.

Running a poll at Gab.com with the finalists

https://gab.com/epik/posts/47910517

A previous poll about cloud storage got more than 300 poll responses. This poll is off to a slower start but we have some contenders.

Thanks for the suggestions.

Regards,
Rob

 

[cabotower]

i voted watchmask.but my heart was with hervv.

 

[BradWilson]

PM sent, late again but I hope you'll still consider what I sent.

 

[debonairaz]

DM sent

 

[Ramesh Kumar G]

PM sent

 

[NamesAgent]

Quick update.

Running a poll at Gab.com with the finalists

https://gab.com/epik/posts/47910517

A previous poll about cloud storage got more than 300 poll responses. This poll is off to a slower start but we have some contenders.

Thanks for the suggestions.

Regards,
Rob

maybe your getting fewer responses because the poll doesn't work. when I try to vote I get an error processing message. I don't know if it's because I'm not registered at Gab, but I'm not going to register just to give my opinion.

 

[Rob Monster]

maybe your getting fewer responses because the poll doesn't work. when I try to vote I get an error processing message. I don't know if it's because I'm not registered at Gab, but I'm not going to register just to give my opinion.

Correct -- you have to be a registered user. If someone wants to be registered, it is currently invite-only but just PM me your email address and I will invite.

 

[Rob Monster]

Here is the post and the results:

I voted for TubeBoss.com, which is why it appears in red above. As you can see, US.TV is the clear winner, followed by WatchMask.com.

 

[vincew]

Well Rob, those names are good for a general tube site but they don't make me think I'm visiting a secure video viewing site (except for WatchMask). They have little to do with that type of site, they're not specific enough.

Of course, that may not be important to you and that's fine. In that case I'd say Intelevise is the best followed closely by TubeBoss.

 

[Joe N]

WatchMask - brand new registration. Very nice. Someone found a good available one that matched the buyer's criteria.

 

[Pedro Santos]

@Rob Monster a few late submissions sent, I REALLY think they're worth considering...

 

[Ategy]

Not really the best of choices here.

US.TV - Would be a very nice option *IF* the company is exclusively based in the USA with zero future aspirations of growing beyond US borders. Otherwise it is an extremely counterproductive choice that would severely limit them.

Intelevise.com - is an absolute nightmare because of the multitude of alternate spellings (intellivise, intellivize, intellevise, intellevise, intelivise, etc. Using the compounded form of intelligence with only a single L would paint them as lower than amateur.

WebVidz - with a Z is also far too amateur for a serious brand. The only time replacing a S with a Z at the end of a domain is even borderline acceptable is if it's an extremely strong single word (just Vidz.com would have been a good choice for example).

WatchMask - Quite simply I just don't get this one. Word flow and phonetics just are very smooth. VideoMask would be a similar name that works better.

TubeBoss - Word flow and phonetics aren't top notch here, but it is significantly better than WatchMask. Overall, because of all the other reasons, this is the only one I would even consider.

 

[Sumeeth]

Dear friends,

I am looking for another great domain name. This one is for a Secure Video Viewing platform. If you are familiar with the service called HookTube.com, it is a way to view videos without being tracked or seeing ads.

The desired domain will be short (not more than 10 characters) and memorable .COM. The brand name will sound honorable, and of general appeal, not sketchy that implies vice or porn.

For those not aware, YouTube has mastered the practice of codifying videos and tracking very carefully who consumes what video, effectively profiling all users.

For this application, users will be able to login to YouTube via the proxy service and browse their channels as normal but any videos they watch is obscured by an advanced proxy service.

We expect to purchase the domain within this week. Budget is up to $10K, possibly higher for a premium domain that justifies a higher budget and would be a good fit for the project.

PM sent, Hope you like it as it suits perfectly for your requirement Secure Video Watching brand!

Thanks,
Sumeeth

 

[Remi]

Pm sent

 

[werejack]

PM sent.
Hadn't seen the update on ongoing poll with watch mask...
if you are through with the search then ignore my message.
Good day.

 

[Rob Monster]

The votes did not change materially and we selected Us.Tv for a larger video project and WatchMask.com as the specific domain for this niche project. I voted for TubeBoss.com but it was not the poll winner.