Bitcoin investor and early evangelist Roger Ver is suing a Hong Kong website operator for $567,000 USD, over an alleged breach of agreement over alleged lost revenues from Bitcoin.com.
Roger Ver is the website’s owner, registrant and administrator.
“In documents filed to Hong Kong’s High Court on Wednesday Ver claimed that OKEX Fintech had broken a contractual agreement which saw OKEX manage and operate Bitcoin.com on behalf of Ver through the domain name Okcoin.com
In its contract with Ver, OKEX was responsible for redesigning the website, garnering revenue from advertising and enhancing the website’s standing globally with SEO.
Court documents show that the agreement reached by Ver and OKEX, would see both of them cooperate for a minimum of 5 years wherein revenues would be split between the two parties.
Ver claims that OKEX stopped and refused to pay a monthly stream of revenue three months into the 60-month contract.
Now, Ver is seeking lost revenues at US$10,000, for the remaining 57 months of the contract which began on December 15, 2014. That amount totals to $570,000 USD.
According to Ver, the contract contested by OKEX is a forgery.
This forged version, includes a clause that gave the Hong Kong firm leeway to cancel the contract with a six-month notice. This tweaked contract, Ver claims, sees his digital signature copied and pasted into the document.
Ver has sought the Hong Kong High Court to declare the contested contract a forgery, in addition to the revenues sought."
Source
Roger Ver is the website’s owner, registrant and administrator.
“In documents filed to Hong Kong’s High Court on Wednesday Ver claimed that OKEX Fintech had broken a contractual agreement which saw OKEX manage and operate Bitcoin.com on behalf of Ver through the domain name Okcoin.com
In its contract with Ver, OKEX was responsible for redesigning the website, garnering revenue from advertising and enhancing the website’s standing globally with SEO.
Court documents show that the agreement reached by Ver and OKEX, would see both of them cooperate for a minimum of 5 years wherein revenues would be split between the two parties.
Ver claims that OKEX stopped and refused to pay a monthly stream of revenue three months into the 60-month contract.
Now, Ver is seeking lost revenues at US$10,000, for the remaining 57 months of the contract which began on December 15, 2014. That amount totals to $570,000 USD.
According to Ver, the contract contested by OKEX is a forgery.
This forged version, includes a clause that gave the Hong Kong firm leeway to cancel the contract with a six-month notice. This tweaked contract, Ver claims, sees his digital signature copied and pasted into the document.
Ver has sought the Hong Kong High Court to declare the contested contract a forgery, in addition to the revenues sought."
Source
