.mobi Asking.mobi is live

[hedgefund]

Another site of mine Asking.mobi goes live.

It is a mobile directory and search services and you are welcome to submit your developed .mobi site to it.

Thanks

 

[onassis]

Thank for the information

 

[newsiness]

keep up good work

 

[thebiffenator]

Great site Hedge and great name well. I will ad my sites to it, and i will ad it to my sites as well.

Keep it up

Biff

 

[Work In Progress]

Another nice site hedge... I'll be submitting mine soon!
:tu:

 

[-REECE-]

Just added mine :tu:

 

[seanboy]

Nice site hedge

 

[pcaero]

Nice site hedge..
I would like to know who you are using for banners...

pc

 

[seanboy]

Nice site hedge..
I would like to know who you are using for banners...

pc

PC, check your email

 

[tony_np]

seems people like build portal .mobi sites.

http://starting.mobi and dir.mobi already did the same work especially starting.mobi has much more functions such as rating for rank.

 

[vcool]

seems people like build portal .mobi sites.

http://starting.mobi and dir.mobi already did the same work especially starting.mobi has much more functions such as rating for rank.

More the merrier ( but not too many of same type I hope ). I think there are still so many applications still need to be developed for .mobi. I wish I had more time to develope different .mobi sites.

Anyway, great sites tony and headgefund. Keep-up the good work.


Vcool

 

[hedgefund]

seems people like build portal .mobi sites.

http://starting.mobi and dir.mobi already did the same work especially starting.mobi has much more functions such as rating for rank.

Points well taken. Admittedly the reason I did this is because it is easy to build directory and RSS sites. It is very difficult to build large original contents by an individual without significant resources, for example, you cannot afford to hire a journalist to interview people and write an original report.

But I am sure with time more and more companies with significant resources will build some great .mobi sites. But for now, I guess we have to live with many simple sites.

 

[-REECE-]

Points well taken. Admittedly the reason I did this is because it is easy to build directory and RSS sites. It is very difficult to build large original contents by an individual without significant resources, for example, you cannot afford to hire a journalist to interview people and write an original report.

But I am sure with time more and more companies with significant resources will build some great .mobi sites. But for now, I guess we have to live with many simple sites.

I'll attest to that! Spending several hours just to provide a single page of unique (not copied from Wikipedia) content certainly isn't desirable to many people... And if you're doing it "for profit", you're likely better off with smaller, simpler sites.

 

[scandiman]

About a month or two ago I was hearing about a California local news and info website that was covering local govt hearings by using reporters in India who attended the meetings via the official webcast. Without this creative cost effective solution, the site owner could not afford to provide the coverage to his site users. Just goes to show that there are creative solutions to having original content.