domain Appraisal for CopyrightsOwner.com

[kathirvel]

Dear NP experts,

Copyrights has been the hot topics online.

I was thinking of to register a copyright or trademark related domain & made a research in finding good name forl ong time.

Atlast i got it!!

And thats Copyrightsowner.com

Thaks in advance for appraisals!

Rgds,
RKVM

 

[Malaysia]

as long as copyrightsowner.com is not copyrighted or trademark..kkeke

a newbie here so cant really appraise well actually

but i think u shud go for copyrightowners.com as well if its not taken..

 

[zoldnap]

The problem with this is that it is copyright owner, not copyrightS owner.
the appended S makes it very bad in terms of Google and OVT.

Also, I dont see any end-usage of this name. Maybe you could put up some ads about legal services and such? so without development, I dont think this name is worth more than low xx

also consider that copyrightowner.com is also for sale according to the parked page, so a potential customer can also get that instead..

just my 2c.

 

[B33R]

Of the four possibles:
copyrightowner (FOR SALE AT SEDO AND AFTERNIC FOR $2999)
copyrightowners (FOR SALE AS "PREMIUM DOMAIN" MINIMUM $888)
copyrightsowner (YOURS)
copyrightsowners (STILL AVAILABLE)

Yours is the third best. Short of it being a typo for the $2999 domain, I'd say it's next to worthless.
Yours refers to multiple copyrights owned by a single "owner". That IMHO isn't a very well used phrase. The simple fact is people don't see it as owning multiple copyrights.

Just a quick Google reveals that the term "copyrights owner" is mostly referring to
"the copyrights owner" rather than an owner of multiple copyrights which makes it a poorly searched term, because the "S" is added purely to describe something belonging to someone (which you wouldn't search for if it was already yours)

I know this isn't what you want to hear but I'll be honest.
Value - reg fee to low $XX (purely as a typo for the above mentioned domain)

 

[MissFlora]

"Giving Rep" is not allowed as a form of promoting your item/services. So I edited out your thread.

As for the appraisal of this domain, I will say low $xx as it is very appealing but can still be developed and might work well for those looking up for domains with copyright. (So as to register something close to that to prevent a lawsuit). Hope that helps.

Flora.

 

[kathirvel]

"Giving Rep" is not allowed as a form of promoting your item/services. So I edited out your thread.

As for the appraisal of this domain, I will say low $xx as it is very appealing but can still be developed and might work well for those looking up for domains with copyright. (So as to register something close to that to prevent a lawsuit). Hope that helps.

Flora.

Thanks for your advice & appraisal !
I wont repeat the same Miss Flora.

Welcome more appraisals !