.tv Amazing result

[pdmshift]

I'd googled and there were amazing results

you can search by site:.tv (only shows dot tv site)

and then it shows

19,400,000 results ... isn't it amazing

I think it seems like "dot TV site explosion"

too many new dot TV site... I can't tell whole new site... because it was too many

It's amazing


p.s

vs mobi (site:.mobi) only 449,000 results :hehe:

 

[rokoroko]

quite high numbers ,I suppose its not unique sites,many of them are doubled tripled,but still impresive results

 

[YesBrilliant]

One thing is for sure: .TV sites/domains are already much, much more popular than .MOBI.

 

[dag]

One thing is for sure: .TV sites/domains are already much, much more popular than .MOBI.

"Popular"? How about "have had much more time to be registered and developed than .MOBI"? That would be a much more accurate statement. I like .TV as much as the next guy, having a few myself, but I also like logic... :gl:

 

[MillersCrossing]

One thing is for sure: .TV sites/domains are already much, much more popular than .MOBI.

To be fair, .TV has had seven years head start over .mobi.....!!

A better test will be seeing how many .MOBI sites vs .TV sites get built over the next 18 months......

And even that test seems like an irrelevance as there should not be a winner out of the two - both aim for different markets.....

Rather the main question for us at .TV is - will 2007/8 be the years that .TV reaches the peak that it had been born to climb -evidenced by such data supporting multiple new .TV quality sites (not .TV names), much greater public recognition of .TV ext and a strong end user market with steadily appreciating domain name sales.

 

[Argos]

See the difference between today and January 2006
http://www.namepros.com/dot-tv/155583-number-of-tv-websites.html?highlight=site:.tv
more than the double in just 1 year time.

 

[SKG]

quite high numbers ,I suppose its not unique sites,many of them are doubled tripled,but still impresive results

Rokoroko is correct. Stats like this are no where near correct because of the fact that many pages within a website can be indexed inflating the overall number of sites.

 

[pdmshift]

right..

right.. that is my point

(I'm not good at english... sorry )

See the difference between today and January 2006
http://www.namepros.com/dot-tv/155583-number-of-tv-websites.html?highlight=site:.tv
more than the double in just 1 year time.