Not necessarily a good hunch ... as the majority of "good" .TV domains, those that advertising agencies may perhaps seek (and then develop as
stand-alone sites), are of the HEFTY

annual renewal fee variety IMHO.
That is totally false & in part shows how much you know about this extension.
Very few domains are so called legacy premiums when you take it as a % of the whole .tv inventory.
Even before recent changes where premiums were dropped for new regs, advertising companies & startups were choosing .tv's that they felt worked well for their goals so i highly doubt they will stop doing so now when even more domains are available without premium renewals.
Jeff face it, you know precious little about this extension & you are too lazy to do the research to find anything out BUT still feel confident enough to try teach others on it.
I see ad agencies chose hand reg .tv's regularly for new promotions on tv, online & through social media but i do the research before i talk about them where as you....:?
I wont waste anymore time typing as i'm sure you have more insight to tell us such as....
There are no sales in .tv (oops that arguement has been cancelled)
There are few developed .tv's (is that cancelled since you were shown 100's of are you still pretneding not to see facts against your hunches & opinions?)
Sales only matter if they will be developed (just pure nonsense if your a domainer, to begin with when you said there was no money in .tv then your view was ROI was all that mattered but now it isnt?
ROI is secondary to selling to developers now? Bank managers disagree there)
Keep teaching Jeff.
Im done, i'll leave it to experts.