I don't think its right for people to try and put down the premise of the article. The article itself is part of the "Take it from the Pros" series on Entrepreneur.com, focusing on small business owners. It's meant to inform and enlighten readers by giving insight based on the professional experiences of successful entrepreneurs.
I'm trying to understand why there is useless sh*t talk at every single avenue when it comes to positive events occurring in the NGTLD namespace. This kind of news is just a part of the natural progression of new gtld's. Domain's like Casino.Live and Homes.Forsale had to be sold in the $xx.xxx-$xxx.xxx range for this to happen. You can't buy eurgoehrgoeh.xyz and expect an to get an article on entrepreneur.com to inform other entrepreneurs about the kind of opportunities New G's bring to the table. I mean what's the point of trashing the article? This guy is 100X more reputable than any of us anonymous posters and his name, brand, business and beliefs are out there for the world to see.
I don't see your point here. Are you saying that smart businesses or people don't buy new g's like coffee.shop? Seems like your insinuating something negative about the intelligence of not only the author but also
@Smiles76. Shame on you.
There will be more end users like Robert Bruce , more news and more 5-6 figure sales made in new g's, the ball is already rolling. I think at this stage its actually pointless trying to debate the validity of new g's. Yes, there are some absolutely horribly managed extensions that domainers and end users alike will be vocal about (like .Art for example), but overall there is a lot of positive things going on with New G's. I still hold a heavy dot com portfolio but I'm preparing for the future as consumer sentiments change and online experiences become more efficient. Dot Com will be an ever present figure in this future but New G's will provide end users with increasingly relevant consumer facing domain names.
"Our expectations of the online user experience are changing as we get savvier about navigating to exactly the things we want; and relevant TLDs are going to be a big part of that"
Very important statement. It explains the entire premise of new g's. The segmentation of the internet by organizing domains into different consumer preferences and industry/interest groups. I have said this before and got bashed, but this article makes it pretty clear that I'm not the only who believes this. Diversify and prepare your portfolio's for the coming years....or miss out on the opportunity. It's that simple.