Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

domain 1ipod(.)com

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pandemic

Established Member
Impact
299
Is this one worth anything? I can only think of maybe 3 ipod domains that would be better than this one. Probably ipod.com, eipod.com and iipod.com. Other than those, I think 1ipod.com has the others beat.

Anyway, what's this thing worth?
 
Last edited:
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains โ€” AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains โ€” AI Storefront
I get it.
He paid for a business account and believes that namepros will protect him from Apple.
hahahahhahaha
 
4
•••
SirDrago, I don't know everything about TM violations, just more than people here. I've been through it a half dozen times. I believe that qualifies me as having a lot more experience and knowledge than most. Perhaps people have 1 domain name before, as it happens, but I lost a half dozen, one by one, lol. I learned it first hand during my noob days.

Maybe if you wouldn't register so many TMs you wouldn't have so much trouble?
 
1
•••
Ok svede, was nice to meet you either way. You guys are ruthless around here, lol.
 
0
•••
Back during the birdflu hype of 2005 - 2006, I had around 1000 birdflu domains. Now that's a lot. Of course I own the forum at avianflutalk.com and swineflu,org, so what can i say .... lol.
 
0
•••
Ok svede, was nice to meet you either way. You guys are ruthless around here, lol.

Just trying to help apologies if I've been a little heavy handed but whichever way you look at it there are problems with this domain.

You can save time and money by deleting it.
 
2
•••
SirDrago, I don't know everything about TM violations, just more than people here.

Now I know you're delusional.... Have a great day and continue lying to yourself because noone here believes you.

Now if you excuse me I'm going to go hand reg 1Google . com
 
2
•••
I've hand registered many good domains. I hand registered swineflu.org back in the day for $8.99, and swineflu.net. I sold swineflu.net for 3k a week later, along with many others. Hell, I just got my favorite today 1wtf.com, lol. No joke.

bdf.biz is expiring. I missed out today when my back ordering company failed to reg 4xc.com. There are still some dot coms that have some value (or will) that are open right now, such as fyi7.com and fyi9.com. xij.biz is currently available. Those are all worth a few bucks, and better than none. I'm a hand reg machine.
 
0
•••
xeu.biz is available. It's a good Chinese acronym for the future. Although, I think Justin Beiders GF is Xena, and she might get mad, lol

Have a good one folks. Last damn time I ask for an appraisal around here.
 
0
•••
Blatant TM infringement were, get rid of the name..obviously it doesnt have to be an exact match, do you really think Apple would be ok if you registered Apple1.com...cmon this is common sense, its not worth being labelled a squatter for a name you will never be able to sell anyway

lol .... thanks. I'll take my chances. Ipodstore.com is for sale, and so is ipod.org. Now ipod.org is a clear violation, but maybe apple doesnt care

It doesn't matter if other names are for sale, they are all infringing on the trademark, if you see someone shoplifting and not getting caught, is it ok for you to go and do it then?? There are 100's of trademarked names on eBay, it doesnt make it ok. Thats why they are still for sale, noone will touch them
 
2
•••
on sedo people are currently bidding on ipods.net and ipodstore.com. See for yourself. No one will touch them? It doesn't seem to bother the sellers and buyers. 1ipod is not an infringement. it's like buying 1car and saying auto dealers are going to come after me. There are a couple hundred ipod names for sale on sedo right now, all of witch use the name ipod. If i were to buy 1apple, is apple coming after me? You guys are being p*ssys. no offense.

And if they do go after you, say fu. Stop being such wimps for Godsakes. Or learn the law. The name is 100% legal. Good grief.
 
0
•••
on sedo people are currently bidding on ipods.net and ipodstore.com. See for yourself. No one will touch them?

More squatters, its just new domainers who dont know any better, see how many actually get paid for, see what prices they go for, and then see if any ever get developed, none ever do. Have a loo kwho owns those 2 names you mentioned and then look at other names they own? Totally clueless :D:D

And if they do go after you, say fu. Stop being such wimps for Godsakes. Or learn the law. The name is 100% legal. Good grief.

Keyboard warrior we have here, like you would say that to Apple, they would rip you a new @sshole, people say that until they get the dreaded letter, then they hand over the name pretty quickly

The name is 100% legal. Good grief.

I dare you to put it in the legal section where there are some very knowledgeable internet lawyers and see what they say?? In fact, can I pose the question for you?
 
2
•••
Of course you can. Have at it. For every attorney you can find to argue that it is, there are several that would argue otherwise. I already know the answer, but feel free to put a link to this thread. Contact Apple directly if you want to. It's common sense to me and the name is free and clear. You guys probably scare people around here with bad advice in some areas.
 
0
•••
Ipod is about the last company that will question a TM violation.


The iPod changes the game in brand identity
ipodad.jpg


The dramatic success of the Apple iPod is a major business story, but the iPodโ€™s innovations in brand identity are a major brand story as well. The iPod represents a game-changing shift in how brand identity is developed and managed. It shows how brand identity can become more effective when itโ€™s less about the company and more about the customer. For brand builders this may seem counter-intuitive, but the iPod demonstrates it can work with great effect.

The iPodโ€™s brand identity innovation
The iPod has moved beyond traditional brand identity approaches in two critical areas. First, it shifts brand identity from a company context to the context of the customer. This is a big change that greatly expands the scope of โ€œbrand identityโ€ itself. It allows for many new layers of brand innovation. Second, placing brand identity in a customer context opens many new avenues for creating customers, and for advancing customers beyond the reach of competitors. The iPod itself is testament to how this can be done.

Iโ€™ll discuss the iPodโ€™s brand identity innovation below, but first Iโ€™ll review some of the problems with traditional approaches to brand identity.

Problems with the traditional brand identity approach
In a traditional brand identity approach, the brand team develops a brand identity thatโ€™s company-centric. The identity stems from a unique company โ€œessenceโ€ that differentiates the brand from competitors and supports marketing goals. Unfortunately, this approach comes with a major problem out of the box: it treats brand identity as a proprietary โ€œpackageโ€ thatโ€™s separate from the customer. Because itโ€™s company property, itโ€™s not meant to be shared. The customer is simply invited (or persuaded) to embrace it, and to become, in effect, a (passive) brand follower.

The traditional approach makes no attempt to add value to the customerโ€™s own identity through the brand. By its nature, it tends to reduce brand identity to a perception play. Because companies desperately want customers to embrace their brands, the marketplace becomes flooded with competing brand campaigns broadcasting โ€œme, me, meโ€ brand identity calls, much like preening birds in the jungle, vying for mates. For customers, this typically results in too little signal, too much noise.

The generic weakness of the conventional approach is that it produces a brand identity in the context of the company, whereas the market exists in the context of the customer. Thatโ€™s a disconnect. Brands use advertising to bridge this gap, but advertising is imperfect and expensive, and increasingly locks the brand into a perception-play spend.

An alternative to the standard approach
There is a brand identity alternative. Why not: 1) add value with your brand identity; 2) share it with the customer; and 3) frame it in the context of the customer, rather than the company? This can provide you with a more direct path to creating customers in the first place, and then keeping them for the long haul.

And thatโ€™s where the iPod points a new way.

Identity is all about the customerโ€”not the company
Customers care about brand identity when it helps them grow their own identity. In truth, they want their identity, not yours. In other words, effective brand identity is about them, and not exclusively about you. The genius of the iPod brand is that it elevates customers to a new identity, without trying to impose its own. This is an act of liberation, not an act of conversion. It changes the game of brand identity from being company-centric, where dozens of brands compete head-to-head, to being customer-centric, where a brand teams with the customer to create a shared identity platform.

Buy an iPod, be a DJ
The iPod nurtures a customer identity from below, rather than projecting a brand identity from above. Through this organic process, the iPod becomes a customer identity enabler. It raises the customer from being a lowly โ€œbuyer of musicโ€ and a lowly โ€œbuyer of an mp3 playerโ€ to a superior identity: that of being a DJ โ€” with the creative power of 10,000 songs.

Why buy an mp3 player from Creative or Dell when one can be a DJ via Apple? Being is superior to buying.

As an identity enabler, the iPod delivers demonstrable coolness. The iPod includes iTunes, and with iTunes every iPod customer can create customized playlists for every mood and occasion. Yes, playlists are a creative act. The iPod elevates the customer from a passive listener in his/her room to a mobile music creator and performer (the DJ), ready to share oneโ€™s taste, sets, mix and rhythms.

Brand identity is customer identity
The iPod does more than give customers power over their music. The iPod offers them their own musical identity. And thus, buying an iPod is an investment in oneโ€™s own identity. This is real, not symbolic. iPod customers are unlocking a part of themselves thatโ€™s been repressed and constrained. Apple understands this, which is why the integration between the iPod, iTunes and the iTunes Music Store is so strong. It is โ€œseamless,โ€ as is the identity it enables.

In fact, the iPod presages a coming convergence of brand identity and brand experience, where identity is forged as part of the brand experience process. This also means that brand identity/customer identity becomes deeply interactive.

Identity that makes a market
The goal of any brand identity effort is to create an identity that makes a market. For this to happen, that identity must be a customer identity. Instead of trying to โ€œsellโ€ a brand identity to the customer, or hook the customer on an illusion, the iPod simply frees a powerful identity driver within the customer. Note how Apple highlights the customer in iPod campaigns. The Apple logo and the iPod donโ€™t dominate the stage. We see persons totally at one with their music. And theyโ€™re not mere โ€œlisteners.โ€ Theyโ€™re manifestations of a new brand identity that exists as a customer identity: dancers, DJโ€™s, performers, creators.

Hosting the new brand/customer identity
Creative and Dell used traditional, company-context identity strategies against the iPod and failed to gain market traction. In effect, their โ€œcompany firstโ€ brand identities had to compete against customer identities fueled by the iPod. It was โ€œno contestโ€ because the iPod had already changed the game. The iPod strategically repositioned digital music identity from the product to the customer. Using its โ€œumbilical cordโ€ of iTunes and the iTunes Music Store, Apple now hosts this new identityโ€”a very enviable position, indeed.

http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/08/30/the-ipod-changes-the-game-in-brand-identity/
 
0
•••
Of course you can. Have at it. For every attorney you can find to argue that it is, there are several that would argue otherwise. I already know the answer, but feel free to put a link to this thread. Contact Apple directly if you want to. It's common sense to me and the name is free and clear. You guys probably scare people around here with bad advice in some areas.

I will let you put this in the legal section, lets see how many go with your opinion. I can assure you 100% that you wont find a lawyer that agrees with you here

I honestly think you know the truth (having been on here since 2006) but are just being stubborn :-/
 
2
•••
2
•••
Here is a list of Apple trademarks. As you can see, 1Ipod is not on the list. Neither is Ipod(s) in the plural. This explains why people are bidding on Ipods.net on Sedo, and won't go near ipod.org. Ipod.org is a major TM violation.

Here are their exact trademarks, and again, 1ipod is not on it. Not sure how much more clear this can be.

http://www.apple.com/legal/intellectual-property/trademark/appletmlist.html
 
0
•••
Is 1ford.com a trademark? Of course it's not, unless ford added it to their list. A trademark is a claim on the "exact" name ONLY, but not variations of the name. They have to trademark different variations of it if that's their desire. Mine isn't even a variation. Even Ipods.net is free in clear. If you guys are saying that it is illegal to buy any and all domains with the name "Ipod" in it, that's crazy, lol. Seems to me that people are just a little upset that I picked it up while browsing. Instead of being upset, be happy. It gives everyone hope that you can get a truly great name still, and they're out there.
 
0
•••
Read the links

Neither was "Blue iPod" or "ipod accessories" or "Mac Friend" on the list..look who owns them now

Cmon Ryan, this is not hard to understand, common sense should prevail here
 
2
•••
A trademark is a claim on the "exact" name ONLY, but not variations of the name

Read the law, that is incorrect, you are making things up now

Seems to me that people are just a little upset that I picked it up while browsing


Im gutted :'(
 
2
•••
Gile, lol. I figured you would need to do a WHO IS on me. Child's play. I expected it.
 
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
Appraise.net
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Zero Commission
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back