IT.COM

What price would you pay to join the ICA?

NameSilo
Watch

What price is the right price for you to join the ICA?


  • 63 votes
  • Ended 4 years ago
  • Final results

equity78

Top Member
TheDomains Staff
TLDInvestors.com
Impact
28,676
A lot of news today on the ICA (Internet Commerce Association)

Elliot Silver posted something on his blog and then I wrote a post about the ICA and industry companies putting together a discount/benefits package to members.

Membership is not cheap, it's cheaper than it once was for individuals but still pricey for many at $600.

Membership
Platinum Membership $25,000 USD and above
Gold Membership $10,000 – $24,999 USD
Silver Membership $5,000 – $9,999 USD
Bronze Membership $1,000 – $4,999 USD
Individual Membership $600 USD

I commend Nat Cohen and others who lowered the price after some of the conversations had. $600 is still too high, domain investor ranks are growing in many parts of the world and they don’t have $600 to donate to the ICA.

Coming up with a $99 option to grow the ranks makes sense in my opinion.

The other thing I always thought was that there should be benefits like how AARP does it.

Rick Schwartz in a comment on DomainInvesting.com articulated that same sentiment.

I want the ICA to succeed and be flushed with $$$.

Here is the issue and it has always been the issue. But there is a chance to change that.

Today I sent in my $145 for my NPPA membership. That’s the National Press Photographer’s Association that I’ve been a member of for nearly 40 years.

They give me press credentials and negotiate all types of deals and discounts and perks and all types of stuff that makes $145 not a payment but a down payment on benefits that pays dividends.

I’ve had my AAA card for 45 years. That cost me about $150 a year. But I get 10 times that back in benefits.

The ICA needs to have benefits. Lots of benefits and lots of members.

They need to learn how to market and make profit.

It has to be run like a business not like a charity.

You make profit by negotiating deals with suppliers that can only be found through the ICA. That gives people a reason to join. Without that you have no spark plug and that’s what the ICA and the industry needs to be effective and have a strong and wide voice.

I think that’s spot on and when you look at AARP you get a ton of benefits for a membership fee that is affordable to most.

So what price do you think would be reasonable for an individual membership that appealed to investors from all over the world?

Would the discounts and benefits be a determining factor for you to join, things like discounts on domain registrations at registrars, lower commissions at marketplaces, blogs giving you a discount off advertising, tools providers giving discounts like DomainIQ, Efty, DNAcademy etc...
 
Last edited:
12
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
The vast majority of domainers won't spend any where near 600 bucks for this.

If you are barely making money to pay your regular bills, paying $600 would be a problem for a most domainers.
 
1
•••
Can anyone help answer what the ICA actually does

ICANN (2010-11) aftermarket dictated / controlled by registries (where accredited registrar is aftermarket place / bid eat bid auction house and promotor for the premium, silver, platinum, whatever ext. )

ICA nn - floating aftermarket, without strict rules (where you can do the thing and thing the thing)

imo
 
Last edited:
1
•••
The ICA should consider a "code of conduct." A code of conduct would weed out some of the unprofessionalism that currently exists in the domain sphere. In that aspect they should at least, at minimum, help define what professionalism really is.
 
3
•••
I am curious and nothing wrong with it, but you suggested free but voted $600.

Right - I'm not sure if my comment above was clear or not. Members that pay, are supporting ICA, in effect paying for ZaK to be an advocate for domain investor interests. In my opinion Zak does a really good job at this. He's very intelligent and active.

However, the influence of the ICA is still very limited. For every Zak, representing domain investor interests, there are dozens of hired gun corporate lobbyists that have other interests.

I feel that the ICA might be able to expand their influence if they had some kind of free level of membership, where a person would contribute time, perhaps by trying to get involved in the ICANN decision making process, or in some other way related to the skills of that person.

I don't think most people here really 'get' the idea of why the ICA exists. It's kind of comical to think that people would only want to join if they'd get a free t-shirt or some consideration equal in value to their payment. The ICA exists because domain investors interests would otherwise not be considered at the policy making level.
 
2
•••
Right - I'm not sure if my comment above was clear or not. Members that pay, are supporting ICA, in effect paying for ZaK to be an advocate for domain investor interests. In my opinion Zak does a really good job at this. He's very intelligent and active.

Wait, the $600 goes to pay for Zak to be an advocate for domain investors?

Is this the same Zak that represented Mr. Booth (poorly IMO) in trying to (some may say intimidate?/ others may say facilitate?) the owner of CQD.com (@spoiltrider) to pay $25,000 to recover her domain name CQD.com that was stolen from her?

https://www.namepros.com/threads/re...-a-stolen-domain.1068888/page-46#post-6683141

Yeah, because that's a good representation on the domain aftermarket. SMH
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Right - I'm not sure if my comment above was clear or not. Members that pay, are supporting ICA, in effect paying for ZaK to be an advocate for domain investor interests. In my opinion Zak does a really good job at this. He's very intelligent and active.

However, the influence of the ICA is still very limited. For every Zak, representing domain investor interests, there are dozens of hired gun corporate lobbyists that have other interests.

I feel that the ICA might be able to expand their influence if they had some kind of free level of membership, where a person would contribute time, perhaps by trying to get involved in the ICANN decision making process, or in some other way related to the skills of that person.

I don't think most people here really 'get' the idea of why the ICA exists. It's kind of comical to think that people would only want to join if they'd get a free t-shirt or some consideration equal in value to their payment. The ICA exists because domain investors interests would otherwise not be considered at the policy making level.

Well to be fair only one person asked for a Tshirt. Thanks for the explanation.
 
0
•••
I have sent a few emails to ICA. No response. Do they only respond to gold membership queries?

IMO get real and get heard. Engage. How about some NP:s presence for starters?
 
0
•••
So $99 the magic number?
 
0
•••
I haven't got any sense at all of what the ICA can do for me, at ANY price level.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back