discuss What's your best domain worth?

Arpit131 · Mar 18, 2019

Hi guys...

Let's play a small game. There are 3 questions each of us answer:

1) What is your best domain?
2) How much do you think it is worth?
3) Why do you think it would fetch you that amount?

The idea here is to remove the biases that we all have towards the domain name that we own.
I have been overly optimistic about many of the domain names that I owned, and that gives a false picture when we approach an end user or an end user approaches us. Ultimately, we end up losing a sale which could have fetched up, say mid xxx to low xxxx or maybe more.

So yeah, lets go ahead! Be a sport! Participate! And let's learn together!

Levi_charlz · Oct 16, 2019

Levi_charlz said:
This is huge and needs much more regulatory clarity, but right now, stablecoins, fiat-backed coins, are generally classed as eMoney.

To name a few companies

Coinbase = USD Coin,
TrustToken = True USD +

TrueGBP, for the British pound

TrueAUD, for the Australian dollar

TrueCAD, for the Canadian dollar

TrueHKD, for the Hong Kong dollar

TrueSGD, for Singaporean dollar

Bitspark = sparkdex.HKD and peg.PHP
Rate3 = Singapore dollar-backed SGDR
Tether Limited = Tether
Paxos Trust Company = PAX token
Monerium = ISKe
Gemini Trust = Gemini Dollar
MakerDAO project = DAI
Stasis Foundation = Stasis Eurs
BitShares = BitUSD
UnionBank = PHX

I’ve only scratched the surface, big hitting payment Services like Paypal, Visa and Mastercard are all rumoured to be close to releasing their own very soon.

And that’s right now.

Central Bank Money is The Next Generation of eMoney.

China, UK, Canada could be among the first to do so.

Bank of Canada exploring digital currency that would replace cash, track how people spend money

The Bank of Canada has been studying digital currencies since at least 2013, when its two-year plan said it would “explore the frontiers of e-money — digital alternatives to cash and their implications for central banks.” More recently, however, the issue has taken on new urgency.

https://business.financialpost.com/...uld-replace-cash-track-how-people-spend-money

Super-Annuation · Oct 16, 2019

Levi_charlz said:
This is huge and needs much more regulatory clarity, but right now, stablecoins, fiat-backed coins, are generally classed as eMoney.

To name a few companies

Coinbase = USD Coin,
TrustToken = True USD +

TrueGBP, for the British pound

TrueAUD, for the Australian dollar

TrueCAD, for the Canadian dollar

TrueHKD, for the Hong Kong dollar

TrueSGD, for Singaporean dollar

Bitspark = sparkdex.HKD and peg.PHP
Rate3 = Singapore dollar-backed SGDR
Tether Limited = Tether
Paxos Trust Company = PAX token
Monerium = ISKe
Gemini Trust = Gemini Dollar
MakerDAO project = DAI
Stasis Foundation = Stasis Eurs
BitShares = BitUSD
UnionBank = PHX

I’ve only scratched the surface, big hitting payment Services like Paypal, Visa and Mastercard are all rumoured to be close to releasing their own very soon.

Tether is a surprising one. Very nice lineup.

To my knowledge the Interledger protocol establishes the use of ISO Standards and is working with Wells Fargo and even Australia's largest bank to ensure global payment systems are efficient.

Interledger were founded by Ripple. They work with hyperledger too.

Will the above legislation you mentioned be adjustable to match the global need for an efficient payment system, meaning clarity on the treatment of each cryptoasset, and eventually financial union on treatment.

If not, eMoneyTokens might not suitably meet the global standard for treatment in relation to regulation.

I think it's very early days, and government will need to further work on the design of the cryptoasset ecosystem.

Levi_charlz · Oct 16, 2019

Super-Annuation said:
Tether is a surprising one. Very nice lineup.

To my knowledge the Interledger protocol establishes the use of ISO Standards and is working with Wells Fargo and even Australia's largest bank to ensure global payment systems are efficient.

Interledger were founded by Ripple. They work with hyperledger too.

Will the above legislation you mentioned be adjustable to match the global need for an efficient payment system, meaning clarity on the treatment of each cryptoasset, and eventually financial union on treatment.

If not, eMoneyTokens might not suitably meet the global standard for treatment in relation to regulation.

I think it's very early days, and government will need to further work on the design of the cryptoasset ecosystem.

The G-7 on Thursday will release broad guidelines for regulating digital money. They will also discuss whether central banks should issue their own. Progress might be sooner than we think.

INFJ · Oct 16, 2019

Slots.com.vn and slot.com.vn
Currently: ???
Later: $100,000+ each (Lol, wouldn't that be nice??!!)

Super-Annuation · Oct 17, 2019

Levi_charlz said:
The G-7 on Thursday will release broad guidelines for regulating digital money. They will also discuss whether central banks should issue their own. Progress might be sooner than we think.

It's happening at a public and business level, but the household level is lagging and where attention is needed (households account for 60%~ GDP)

Image needing an ID card for banks and another for drivers license, and another for University. This is where we are with wallets. Interoperability being the issue.

Then you have cross chain transactions. Imagine having to purchase several currencies and several wallets for different purchases on Amazon, eBay and Netflix etc. Then only be able to use the currency on those platforms.

Then we have scalability, dissemination, liquidity, risk, timeframes. Experts have the hype years pegged around mid 2020's.

Once the major banks allow me to transfer ripple from my savings account, to purchase units in a managed fund, which is full of various collateralized-multi-asset-digital-securities, you can begin celebrating

Levi_charlz · Oct 17, 2019

Levi_charlz said:
The G-7 on Thursday will release broad guidelines for regulating digital money. They will also discuss whether central banks should issue their own. Progress might be sooner than we think.

G7 is Developing a Report Highlighting the Risks of Stablecoins like Libra

https://thetokenist.io/g7-is-developing-a-report-highlighting-the-risks-of-stablecoins-like-libra/

illumy · Oct 17, 2019

Tin Nguyen said:
Slots.com.vn and slot.com.vn
Currently: ???
Later: $100,000+ each (Lol, wouldn't that be nice??!!)

Slot.tw

ahmed gamil · Oct 18, 2019

i have smswiki .com travelpharos .com
i love this domains

Levi_charlz · Oct 18, 2019

Super-Annuation said:
It's happening at a public and business level, but the household level is lagging and where attention is needed (households account for 60%~ GDP)

Image needing an ID card for banks and another for drivers license, and another for University. This is where we are with wallets. Interoperability being the issue.

Then you have cross chain transactions. Imagine having to purchase several currencies and several wallets for different purchases on Amazon, eBay and Netflix etc. Then only be able to use the currency on those platforms.

Then we have scalability, dissemination, liquidity, risk, timeframes. Experts have the hype years pegged around mid 2020's.

Once the major banks allow me to transfer ripple from my savings account, to purchase units in a managed fund, which is full of various collateralized-multi-asset-digital-securities, you can begin celebrating

Im not getting the cigars out yet but

G-7 task force released full report on impact of Global Stablecoins.

‘3. Legal, regulatory and oversight frameworks applicable to GSCs:

Those providing payment services, custody, issuance and trading could fall within the scope of different regulatory categories

A GSC could also qualify as a unit in a collective investment scheme or as electronic money (e-money).’

https://www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d187.pdf

Super-Annuation · Oct 18, 2019

Levi_charlz said:
Im not getting the cigars out yet but

G-7 task force released full report on impact of Global Stablecoins.

‘3. Legal, regulatory and oversight frameworks applicable to GSCs:

Those providing payment services, custody, issuance and trading could fall within the scope of different regulatory categories

A GSC could also qualify as a unit in a collective investment scheme or as electronic money (e-money).’

I like how prudent they're being mentioning investment fund units and emoney as being considered a stablecoin. It's important because those kinds of products need the stability of modern currency.

It's also great to see that their is guidance for investors on a greater scale, soon we'll have a clear understanding as payment system ISO standards are adopted and investment vehicles.

I wonder if they'll use stablecoins for ETF's? Like a hybrid version. Half open and have closed ended fund... ha! Never happen.

Regarding value for emoney tokens, I can find government documents, news sources etc that discuss CryptographicAssets, and I have it in .com and .eth. It's something, but no more than the equivalent of holding domains like EuroBond, T-Bill or PromissoryNote. It comes down to traffic, end user and usability.

Levi_charlz · Oct 18, 2019

Super-Annuation said:
I like how prudent they're being mentioning investment fund units and emoney as being considered a stablecoin. It's important because those kinds of products need the stability of modern currency.

It's also great to see that their is guidance for investors on a greater scale, soon we'll have a clear understanding as payment system ISO standards are adopted and investment vehicles.

I wonder if they'll use stablecoins for ETF's? Like a hybrid version. Half open and have closed ended fund... ha! Never happen.

Regarding value for emoney tokens, I can find government documents, news sources etc that discuss CryptographicAssets, and I have it in .com and .eth. It's something, but no more than the equivalent of holding domains like EuroBond, T-Bill or PromissoryNote. It comes down to traffic, end user and usability.

Traffic is a good value indicator.

Maybe I’ll do better with GlobalStablecoins(dot)com

Super-Annuation · Oct 20, 2019

Levi_charlz said:
Traffic is a good value indicator.

Maybe I’ll do better with GlobalStablecoins(dot)com

Well WorldStablecoin is asking $1,000 plus and SecurityToken minimum offer is $500+

Do you see a company calling themselves Global Stablecoin, eMoney Tokens or Cryptographic Assets?
Maybe eMoney Token or Cryptographic Asset, without the 's' but that's as much as I can see.

Smart Contract and Digital Asset are names of existing companies, and there is a big difference in the type of name they've chosen to use.

Modern example would be a company calling themselves EuroBond/s or Gold Bullion/s. It just isn't common for a company to name themselves after the asset, unless the asset has more than the something like just currency utility... like Realestate = asset/agency or even Smart Contract = token fabric/computer protocol

Bonds .com and some others are just the exception

You just never know what will happen though. I put a bid in for Security Token .com just to get a feel for the value and potentially buy it if it's within my asking range.

Levi_charlz · Oct 20, 2019

Super-Annuation said:
Well WorldStablecoin is asking $1,000 plus and SecurityToken minimum offer is $500+

Do you see a company calling themselves Global Stablecoin, eMoney Tokens or Cryptographic Assets?
Maybe eMoney Token or Cryptographic Asset, without the 's' but that's as much as I can see.

Smart Contract and Digital Asset are names of existing companies, and there is a big difference in the type of name they've chosen to use.

Modern example would be a company calling themselves EuroBond/s or Gold Bullion/s. It just isn't common for a company to name themselves after the asset, unless the asset has more than the something like just currency utility... like Realestate = asset/agency or even Smart Contract = token fabric/computer protocol

Bonds .com and some others are just the exception

You just never know what will happen though. I put a bid in for Security Token .com just to get a feel for the value and potentially buy it if it's within my asking range.

Would a company call themselves by the same names? For sure (I’m about to do it)

As far as I’m aware, the value of a name isn’t always about if it’s brandable. Would you call your company ‘CarInsurance.com? Is it valuable? Damn right it is. Type-in traffic, exact match domains, SEO and whether if not they are Category Killers contribute significantly to defining value. Certainly not saying they are in the same ball park as ‘Insurance’ (far from it) but these keywords (Tokens, Stablecoins, eMoney) are shaking up the financial world right now.

They aren’t names that have been dreamt up in the hope that world leading financial regulators like the FCA or G7 Task Force will release official reports and adopt the terms

I’ll have to check, but Tokens.com sold for iro $500k and SecurityTokens.com $8k about 12 months ago before Facebooks ‘Libra’ came onto the scene and the proverbial hit the fan, so I’d expect them both to of increased in value considerably.

For the time being I’ve knocked up a couple of sites as I’ve decided not to sell them and develop them. ‘eMoneyTokens’ now holds position 1 on Google and ’GSCs’ is a work in progress.

There’s a chance I might regret turning away interested parties, but the potential of these are too great an opportunity to miss. (and I need a project as looking after 2 kids every day is sending me loopy)

Super-Annuation · Oct 20, 2019

Levi_charlz said:
Would a company call themselves by the same names? For sure (I’m about to do it)

As far as I’m aware, the value of a name isn’t always about if it’s brandable. Would you call your company ‘CarInsurance.com? Is it valuable? Damn right it is. Type-in traffic, exact match domains, SEO and whether if not they are Category Killers contribute significantly to defining value. Certainly not saying they are in the same ball park as ‘Insurance’ (far from it) but these keywords (Tokens, Stablecoins, eMoney) are shaking up the financial world right now.

They aren’t names that have been dreamt up in the hope that world leading financial regulators like the FCA or G7 Task Force will release official reports and adopt the terms

I’ll have to check, but Tokens.com sold for iro $500k and SecurityTokens.com $8k about 12 months ago before Facebooks ‘Libra’ came onto the scene and the proverbial hit the fan, so I’d expect them both to of increased in value considerably.

For the time being I’ve knocked up a couple of sites as I’ve decided not to sell them and develop them. ‘eMoneyTokens’ now holds position 1 on Google and ’GSCs’ is a work in progress.

There’s a chance I might regret turning away interested parties, but the potential of these are too great an opportunity to miss. (and I need a project as looking after 2 kids every day is sending me loopy)

You're definately right in being positive, I totally forgot about traffic names like OnlineBanking or CarAuction or FreeSamples or InternetOfThings. How much would EuroBonds be worth by the way? I'm still rubbish at domaining, so if you don't mind me picking your brain?
I didn't mean to come off like that. I think I might be slightly autistic that way haha. I'd also had a couple of beers hahaha

eMoneyTokens has traffic appeal. Last night I just though you were thinking a company because you bought all the extensions, which some will have value. Mostly .com .net and .org are valuable for those sorts of traffic words, right? Sorry for the misunderstanding brother. You'll do well, definately.

Super-Annuation · Oct 20, 2019

Levi_charlz said:
Would a company call themselves by the same names? For sure (I’m about to do it)

As far as I’m aware, the value of a name isn’t always about if it’s brandable. Would you call your company ‘CarInsurance.com? Is it valuable? Damn right it is. Type-in traffic, exact match domains, SEO and whether if not they are Category Killers contribute significantly to defining value. Certainly not saying they are in the same ball park as ‘Insurance’ (far from it) but these keywords (Tokens, Stablecoins, eMoney) are shaking up the financial world right now.

They aren’t names that have been dreamt up in the hope that world leading financial regulators like the FCA or G7 Task Force will release official reports and adopt the terms

I’ll have to check, but Tokens.com sold for iro $500k and SecurityTokens.com $8k about 12 months ago before Facebooks ‘Libra’ came onto the scene and the proverbial hit the fan, so I’d expect them both to of increased in value considerably.

For the time being I’ve knocked up a couple of sites as I’ve decided not to sell them and develop them. ‘eMoneyTokens’ now holds position 1 on Google and ’GSCs’ is a work in progress.

There’s a chance I might regret turning away interested parties, but the potential of these are too great an opportunity to miss. (and I need a project as looking after 2 kids every day is sending me loopy)

So CryptographicAssets, do you thing this has any value?

Also, how much do you think your name is worth?

Super-Annuation · Oct 20, 2019

OnlineIdentityCheck.com

Levi_charlz · Oct 20, 2019

Totally cool mate. Your perspective is totally valid.

I’m not experienced enough to offer price advice but first check out ‘name bio’ and see if there has been any sales for those keywords.

‘EuroBonds’ sounds very interesting. You could be onto something. ’Cryptographic Assets’ sounds a bit niche. You should ask some of the more experienced Domainers.

Which name, eMoneyTokens or GlobalStablecoins? Hard to say, I’m not interested in price really. I’ve made my mind up to develop them both so it’s pointless to speculate.

I think you've got some interesting names and on the right tracks. You’re doing much better than I did when I first started.

Good luck.

HotKey · Jan 8, 2022

I value my best domain at $75k, though its worth will only be determined at the point of sale. Why will it fetch me 75k? No effin' clue, but it's what I want for it.

DOMAIN ILLUMINATI · Jan 8, 2022

DOMAIN ILLUMINATI said:
betthelot said:

We all have our own valuations, especially on our own domains we look at them through rose tinted glasses and I am not immune to that.
[...]

Click to expand...

For the case that you mean me too with your "... we look at ...", I have to make clear that I don't have rose tinted glasses ...

... and that I am immune to that because my glasses are red.

If one does not understand my evaluation of my domain name, then I am absolutely ok with that - but when I read such a general assertion ("... we look at them through rose tinted glasses ...") then I have to make it clear that I am not affected by it.

The red glasses are an alegory to the red pill.

DOMAIN ILLUMINATI · Jan 8, 2022

jedaprin · Jan 9, 2022

PATENT.CODES
456054.Com = Ouija patent number

nametrekker · Jan 10, 2022

it all comes in the negotiation and who's the buyer or broker
if the broker is marksmen or com laude or one of the big law firms (perkins coie, fenwick west, cooley) repping ip acquisitions of the BIG 100 companies, expect a lengthy negotiation (attorneys bill by the hr or hybrid) expect a big windfall and be willing to hold your ground on your ask

high stakes negotiations can be fun

also their brokers will often say, e.g, "Our client is willing to make a final offer of 500 K USD."

Will you be willing to say, "No", on a META, NFT, DAO domain you registered for 9 dollars 3-7 yrs earlier or scooped up for 1500 usd in the aftermarket?

I always said "NO" when I had zero kids, but kids, college tuitions, etc transform the negotiating table - except when you're playing with house money as do the Domain Royalty (those who have made over 100 million usd from domain sales)

I'm a mere commoner in the domain world, with only one 7 figure sale.

In other words, my advice means ZERO

ThatNameGuy · Jan 10, 2022

HotKey said:
I value my best domain at $75k, though its worth will only be determined at the point of sale. Why will it fetch me 75k? No effin' clue, but it's what I want for it.

Truth.online
HotKey.....i haven't posted here in a while....i've been busy adding to my .Online portfolio of which Truth.online is one of my best. Because truth.com forwards to a hardware store, and since Nameworth values Truth.com at 4 Million Dollars I'd value Truth.online at 500K, and that would be a bargain for the buyer.

HappyNewYear.online!!!

bracic · Jan 10, 2022

I own goalsaf//com. Hand bought it on a whim and is a popular hashtag. Had one buyer offer 10k a couple years ago. Nothing close since.

I also own multiple 4 letter domains that I do nothing with. Not sure what to do with them.

discuss What's your best domain worth?

Top Member

Account Closed (Requested)

#Top Member

Account Closed (Requested)

I.T. Infrastructure EngineerTop Member

#Top Member

Account Closed (Requested)

Established Member

Fekra-vb.ComAccount Closed (Disallowed)

Account Closed (Requested)

#Top Member

Account Closed (Requested)

#Top Member

Account Closed (Requested)

#Top Member

#Top Member

#Top Member

Account Closed (Requested)

Made in CanadaTop Member

THTMVATMEDNOATTop Member

THTMVATMEDNOATTop Member

Established Member

Established Member

Top Member

New Member

Similar threads

We're social

Pinned

Appreciation

Agreement