NameSilo
Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Hello, I think it would be pretty useful to keep track of all LLLL.com sales , even the little ones under $100 so that , pretty soon , when the available LLLL.com will be finished , we`ll have a better idea on market prices.

It is important that these sales are confirmed. So before to post, make sure payment went OK.

I will start with todays` Sedo confirmed sales:

FISE.com 2,700 Euros
TSRT.com US $760
VEUP.com US $1,700


Also, I found interesting to see this average LLLL, getting bids up to $51 and reserve not me. It says it all.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...110154111735_W0QQ_trksidZm37QQfromZR40QQfviZ1
 
Last edited:
4
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Welcome back Snoop. I missed you.

BTW if you want to let HealthCare.net go for the same price as Cats.net then send me a message.

Brad

Thanks. Regarding healthcare.net it will sell for significantly more, it is a higher quality name (commercial focus), more comparable to skincare.net.
 
0
•••
I think the only ones investing heavily (at least that I've seen) at the moment are people who can more than afford to wait whatever number of years it takes for them to be satisfied with the price they can get. I sold 1030 of them this weekend to one domainer with a long term hold strategy. Another well known domainer is buying several thousand although his price was a bit lower than I was willing to take -- same story there, about buying for the long term. Of the 2100 LLLL.coms I've sold over the past 50 days, over 1600 were bought between just 3 domainers, all 3 of which I know can more than afford to wait it out and all 3 of which have very large amounts of LLLL.coms.

You probably need to lower your price.



I like the way you describe sales now as "lower than normal", what is is "normal", where the market was months ago?

Folks it is time to ditch the low end of the market, stop wasting money on renewals, the tide isn't going to suddenly turn, even Nemo doesn't bother to report the sales anymore, that is how bad sales are. In the next 6-12 months either the buyout will collapse or people will waste millions renewing this junk.

Look at what is happening elsewhere, the stock market has has risen 28% from its lows, optimism has improved, whilst the losses from LLLL.com continues to grow. Low quality LLLL.com domains are boom time names, the wait will be years and it will be painful for those who keep throwing reg fees at them.
 
0
•••
Yesterday on TDNX:

zrgo $142
xqoo $31
tqoo $76
rqoo $45
pqoo $77
okfx $50
nqoo $265
lqoo $290
jqoo $195
giuo $91
bueo $100
bdfq $26
renewals have been added
 
0
•••
I think the only ones investing heavily (at least that I've seen) at the moment are people who can more than afford to wait whatever number of years it takes for them to be satisfied with the price they can get. I sold 1030 of them this weekend to one domainer with a long term hold strategy. Another well known domainer is buying several thousand although his price was a bit lower than I was willing to take -- same story there, about buying for the long term. Of the 2100 LLLL.coms I've sold over the past 50 days, over 1600 were bought between just 3 domainers, all 3 of which I know can more than afford to wait it out and all 3 of which have very large amounts of LLLL.coms.

I'm talking about all the people holding these names facing renewals (who either have to come up with the money, sell out or drop). I'm not really surprised at your findings that the smaller holders aren't buying.

I guess the question is for the people still buying at the low end, how many can they afford to buy and then renew in coming months?
 
0
•••
0
•••
If that really ended at $79, then someone got a hell of a deal. Quad Premium with all top tier premium letters.

Brad

cdrl $79 at Namejet.
 
0
•••
If that really ended at $79, then someone got a hell of a deal. Quad Premium with all top tier premium letters.

Brad

Yes, and bmrt ended at $121 at Snapnames. Good deal as well!
 
0
•••
Yesterday on Namejet:

fwne $70
qrem $79
ryis $69
zbas $99
oibt $170
emuw $113
dncj $69
nlch $119
myyn $109

Today on TDNX:

zvaf $25
xqqw $25
wqqx $40
vxrx $36
uxqq $25
tqbq $25
tqpq $110
spbq $30
qqps $25
qqwp $25
qqxw $75
pqqh $25
pqxw $25
nutq $102
mebj $46
mavy $1,515
hqpq $25
jazr $178
hfbq $31
hqbq $51
bqhf $25
bqjq $25
renewals have been added
 
0
•••
0
•••
did not see this one, was it a pre-release?

It was a pending delete. 15 initial bidders, but I guess everyone forgot about it :lol:
 
0
•••
I always have all the all premiums in my list, and I didn't have cdrl, something is fishy... I mean, $79 is a joke. Lucky lucky buyer!
 
0
•••
menz $3,100 (Sedo)
sazz $2,350 (Sedo)
irod $705 (Pool)
ayob $610 (Sedo)
vlis $212 (Sedo)
hhem $150 (Sedo)




LLLL.com sales from last DNjournal report :

UXUA.com $8,460 (Sedo)
USAR.com $6,000 (NJ)
Lulz.com $5,500 (Sedo)
bubo.com $4,935 (Sedo)
payg.com $4,346 (Sedo)
ukeu.com $3,500 (Sedo)
radd.com $3,201 (NJ)
wewu.com $3,032 (Sedo)
mpre.com $2,916 (NJ)
efts.com $2,651 (NJ)
mofy.com $2,500 (Afternic)
zowa.com $2,400 (NJ)
pwid.com $2,150 (Sedo)
 
0
•••
I always have all the all premiums in my list, and I didn't have cdrl, something is fishy... I mean, $79 is a joke. Lucky lucky buyer!
Ya this is fishy !! Post a screen shot of the winning bid. I don't believe it.
 
0
•••
Ya this is fishy !! Post a screen shot of the winning bid. I don't believe it.

I won this one myself, but I am as surprised as anyone else...

This is the auction history (don't know how to add a screenshot here):

cdrl.com

You won the auction.

Auction Details:
Current High Bid: US $79
Your Max Bid: US $79
Auction End Time: Jun. 24, 2009 12:13 PM PT

Bid History: 16 bid(s) from 15 bidder(s)
High Bidder: euroflash
Additional Details
Type: Private Auction
Registration Price: Included
Starting Time: Jun. 21, 2009 2:00 PM PT
Duration: 2-day listing
This auction is closed
Winning Bid: US $79
High Bidder: euroflash

Bid History Details: 16 bid(s) from 15 bidder(s)COLLAPSE
Bidder Amount Date
euroflash $79 Jun. 24, 2009 8:52 AM PT
lovedomains $69 Jun. 19, 2009 12:37 AM PT
tetucky $69 Jun. 20, 2009 8:58 AM PT
alfaro $69 Jun. 20, 2009 2:13 PM PT
euroflash $69 Jun. 20, 2009 7:15 PM PT
lujch $69 Jun. 20, 2009 8:00 PM PT
homer $69 Jun. 20, 2009 8:38 PM PT
gouride $69 Jun. 20, 2009 9:59 PM PT
point $69 Jun. 21, 2009 2:10 AM PT
namecn $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:23 AM PT
deeppocket $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:26 AM PT
winters $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:35 AM PT
richrich $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:40 AM PT
1002626 $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:47 AM PT
domainlist $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:54 AM PT
pixelizer $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:56 AM PT
 
0
•••
I have a quad on Sedo atm, hopefully it should do better that the avg sale atm, it has traffic and revenue and is 2001 registered, but who knows.

cdrl for 79 I'd buy in a shot though :p

Just fyi, there's a short domain live auction coming up at NamePros:

Regular Live Auction – Short domains
5 letters or less
Thu, Jul 2, 2009, 6pm EST

http://www.namepros.com/domain-name-discussion/592240-next-live-auction-at-namepros.html

Not restricted to .com, but I'd be surprised if .coms didn't make up the bulk of the auction list.
 
0
•••
OSEI.com

$1000

Just ended at Sedo....
 
0
•••
Congrats!

Would be a deal had it been any quad but this one is well above that :)

I won this one myself, but I am as surprised as anyone else...

This is the auction history (don't know how to add a screenshot here):

cdrl.com

You won the auction.

Auction Details:
Current High Bid: US $79
Your Max Bid: US $79
Auction End Time: Jun. 24, 2009 12:13 PM PT
 
0
•••
Today on TDNX:

wxgs $56
wkqo $25
pygn $31
pypg $25
prcf $149
mwvw $41
jwwv $41
bqtx $25
renewals have been added

Today on Namejet:

htcn $241
baai $440
aygn $89
pieu $220
gdlb $122


.
 
0
•••
Congrats!

Would be a deal had it been any quad but this one is well above that :)

Thanks! But ironically, Estibot only values it at $50 :laugh:
 
0
•••
Thanks! But ironically, Estibot only values it at $50 :laugh:
Estibot doesn't value some quads very well. The name is easily worth $130 on any given day. Are you going to flip the name or keep it?
 
0
•••
0
•••
strange, did not see this one.
how many days did you notice the listing before the order day?


I won this one myself, but I am as surprised as anyone else...

This is the auction history (don't know how to add a screenshot here):

cdrl.com

You won the auction.

Auction Details:
Current High Bid: US $79
Your Max Bid: US $79
Auction End Time: Jun. 24, 2009 12:13 PM PT

Bid History: 16 bid(s) from 15 bidder(s)
High Bidder: euroflash
Additional Details
Type: Private Auction
Registration Price: Included
Starting Time: Jun. 21, 2009 2:00 PM PT
Duration: 2-day listing
This auction is closed
Winning Bid: US $79
High Bidder: euroflash

Bid History Details: 16 bid(s) from 15 bidder(s)COLLAPSE
Bidder Amount Date
euroflash $79 Jun. 24, 2009 8:52 AM PT
lovedomains $69 Jun. 19, 2009 12:37 AM PT
tetucky $69 Jun. 20, 2009 8:58 AM PT
alfaro $69 Jun. 20, 2009 2:13 PM PT
euroflash $69 Jun. 20, 2009 7:15 PM PT
lujch $69 Jun. 20, 2009 8:00 PM PT
homer $69 Jun. 20, 2009 8:38 PM PT
gouride $69 Jun. 20, 2009 9:59 PM PT
point $69 Jun. 21, 2009 2:10 AM PT
namecn $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:23 AM PT
deeppocket $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:26 AM PT
winters $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:35 AM PT
richrich $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:40 AM PT
1002626 $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:47 AM PT
domainlist $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:54 AM PT
pixelizer $69 Jun. 21, 2009 8:56 AM PT
 
0
•••
Estibot doesn't value some quads very well. The name is easily worth $130 on any given day. Are you going to flip the name or keep it?

I think I will keep it for a while and see where the market goes.

---------- Post added at 08:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:42 AM ----------

strange, did not see this one.
how many days did you notice the listing before the order day?

Only a few days before the auction. But I don't remember which search criteria I used when I added it to my backorders. Strange auction indeed...
 
0
•••
0
•••
I didn't get that, I own Bunq.com, wanted to have Bunk as a pair, but no way at that price.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back