news Company tries “Plan B” reverse domain name hijacking

Gabriel360 · Oct 11, 2024

There should be more consequences for complainants with frivolous claims that result in a finding of RDNHs.

Specifically, they should be made to pay the respondents' attorney fees and some damages for wasting the time of the panel and the respondent.

For instance, this company's excuse for filing a silly claim was that their attorney was too sick to read a letter from the respondent explaining the frivolity of the case.

Nuisance like this will not stop unless they are hit where it hurts: right in their finances.

MKA · Oct 11, 2024

Gabriel360 said:
There should be more consequences for complainants with frivolous claims that result in a finding of RDNHs.

Specifically, they should be made to pay the respondents' attorney fees and some damages for wasting the time of the panel and the respondent.

For instance, this company's excuse for filing a silly claim was that their attorney was too sick to read a letter from the respondent explaining the frivolity of the case.

Nuisance like this will not stop unless they are hit where it hurts: right in their finances.

In EU you have the English rule, which forces the losing party to pay for all the legal fees.

In the US I think you have to sue for damages.

news Company tries “Plan B” reverse domain name hijacking

More options

Gabriel360

Top Member

MKA

Top Member

Similar threads

We're social

Top news this week ➔

New posts ➔

Auction activity ➔

How do you think a potential buyer first checks if your domain is for sale?

Polls of interest ➔

Hot this week ➔

Community favorite ➔

Hot this month ➔

Blog favorites

BreckenridgeTherapy.com

CountryRoad.net

fiveplumbing.com

SpatialArt.xyz

roadrunnergraphics.com

ETHcapital.net

SeattleInsuranceQuotes.com

corridor.cc

xgq.xyz

RaggedyAF.com

Pinned

Appreciation

Agreement

Answers

Relevance

Reaction

Status

Feeling