Dynadot

A lack of creativity in domain name creation?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Adrigan

Established Member
Impact
24
It seems to me that there is a lack of creativity in domain name creation.

I sense that there is a fixation/obsession with keywords so that the domain will appeal to Google, a private company that is an effective monopoly and seems to do whatever it likes. Remember when Google were upstarts and said “Don’t be evil” - well, they have become what they once despised.
This happens with many challengers to the status quo, in that once they begin to grow, they can soon become the status quo and act in ways that they used to criticize/despise others. Apple is another such company, and as much as I like their products (except their poor Mail program), approaching $3 trillion in revenue hampers your ability to being a challenger, an innovator, fresh.
Perhaps if Steve and Jony were still there, Apple could still have those attributes.

But I digress.

I haven’t ever focused on creating domains based on keywords. It just seems that the keyword space is so overcrowded that getting noticed becomes harder and harder over time. I also don’t really understand this space, having not explored it and I also take exception to being at the mercy of the evil G, who behave as judge, jury & executioner, to say the least of their antics.

Looking at the some of the recently created internet companies (last 15 years or so), there are many two word company names made up of dictionary words, but a good number are names that are not real words and their names are just made up.
This is the area I have focused on for the past 10+ years and I have been surprised at how many names have been available that I have come up with. Over the last few years, I have added over 200 names to my portfolio and I am coming up with name ideas all the time. Although not all my name ideas become names I register.

I don’t expect many of my names to appeal to lots of people or that they will sell for eyebrow raising amounts. But like all seller/buyer scenarios, it only takes one person to like a name I have created and like it enough to want to buy it. Given the population of internet users, which is always growing and that useful domain names are becoming increasingly rarer, I think that won’t be hard to achieve.

I usually come up with names by something I see or hear, sometimes swapping letters around or adding 1-2 letters, sometimes replacing letters. I have also “discovered” names, serendipitously, by making typos when I’ve been typing something, like an email or a url. It is surprising to me how often this happens and I am stopped in my working flow. I pause for a while and think about what is on the screen. Sometimes, its nothing or really just junk, but sometimes it looks and sounds great to me.

Usually, I need to like how the domain sounds and if it passes the “radio test”. I also have to be able to see what market the name might address or appeal to and whether that market is immature/mature and/or overcrowded and/or populated by upstarts. Domain names are very low cost, but if you register many iffy names or names with fringe appeal, the costs add up.
I check the visitor figures for each of my domains as they are coming up for renewal and take a decision on whether to renew or let them expire. I don’t let many go.

I tend to focus on 5-8 letter domains (4 letter domains are almost all taken up, the worthwhile ones that is, but I don’t spend any time searching just for these), but I might go beyond 8 letters if the name sounds very good to me.

I do have some domains that are real words, including people’s names, but this is less than 5% of my portfolio.

If you have approached domain name creation in ways other than by using keywords, perhaps you’d like to share your method or comment on mine.
 
5
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
People should start very diversified and not try to put too much of their portfolio into one line of thought. There is nothing wrong with trying to create a few brandables, but why not also pick up some keyword domains, some liquid domains, and different extensions, and see what works best for you? Sometimes we don't know where our talent lies until we experiment.

I play around with a few made-up brandables, but I have found that picking names where there are already several businesses using that name gives me better results. I tried longer domains, 3 and 4-word domains, and other extensions, but after reviewing the metrics for those niches, I decided there just was not any ROI there for me. I am not saying there is no money to be made there, but obviously, my skillset and line of thinking did not match up with success in those areas.

I keep a handful of names that I probably shouldn't, but my main focus is on names where I have a record of success. I am a hobbyist, but my net sales have exceeded my costs every year for over 20 years now with an average portfolio size of 250-400 and an average acquisition price under $30 per name. I have even quit domaining a couple of times and rebuilt my portfolio from scratch without losing, so I am not making money from domains I've held forever.

There are many models for success in this business, the key is finding the model that matches our aptitudes and our attitudes.
 
15
•••
All of the following domains have MarkMonitor nameservers.

Which of these domains are considered "creative"?

Which not?

Why?

AirDog.com
BigTea.com
CarFox.com
DotFox.com
DuoSet.com
ELoans.com
EVChat.com
EcoLab.com
EpiBio.com
FoxApp.com
FoxJet.com
GenApp.com
GeneGo.com
GoRent.com
HRPost.com
ICheck.com
KeyDNA.com
LabFly.com
LawKey.com
LoveTV.com
MAudio.com
MapleX.com
MeatMe.com
MyBook.com
MyMint.com
MyWave.com
NewPig.com
OneTax.com
PayPay.com
PrimeX.com
ReGrow.com
SexFit.com
ShareX.com
SunEra.com
TaxNet.com
TaxPay.com
ToyFun.com
UpNext.com
VGames.com
WeCash.com
WeShow.com
WinNow.com
YourXL.com

AIMedia.com
AirSure.com
AirWalk.com
AirWork.com
AllTour.com
AppMaps.com
AppPack.com
BabySum.com
BaySide.com
BetCast.com
BetaLab.com
BioBeat.com
BuyDocs.com
CarShow.com
CareBay.com
CellOne.com
DNSFirm.com
DayAuto.com
DayDots.com
DayPost.com
DealBay.com
DevDeal.com
DogFood.com
DotPack.com
DotSpot.com
DuoFast.com
ECrafts.com
EastLaw.com
EasyAir.com
EasyApe.com
EasyArt.com
EasyFly.com
EasyGym.com
EasyHub.com
EcoLabs.com
EcoSure.com
EpiLife.com
EuroCar.com
EuroPay.com
FilmPix.com
FinBank.com
FineLaw.com
FireMap.com
FlyCast.com
FoxKids.com
FoxLife.com
FoxPlay.com
FoxPlus.com
GenGirl.com
GenLine.com
GeneSea.com
GetSpin.com
GymKids.com
GymMail.com
HelpKey.com
HelpNet.com
HelpNow.com
HomeOwl.com
JetPlan.com
JobMesh.com
LabDrop.com
LabGold.com
LawNews.com
LifeMap.com
LiveFin.com
MPortal.com
MapTour.com
MedCars.com
MediSys.com
MindBio.com
MyScene.com
NFTFeed.com
NameCop.com
NanoLux.com
NeoWare.com
NetBook.com
NextApe.com
OurNews.com
OutTime.com
PayFlow.com
PetExpo.com
PetPath.com
PinkDog.com
PopBets.com
ProReal.com
ProTeam.com
RealBay.com
SeaPlay.com
SiteNow.com
SkiExpo.com
SkiTrip.com
SkiWear.com
SkySale.com
SoftMax.com
SunFace.com
SunFire.com
TalkNow.com
TaxEdge.com
TaxLife.com
TeleBay.com
TheFlip.com
TimeBio.com
TimePix.com
ToyShow.com
TrustIQ.com
UpCycle.com
UpWorks.com
VAction.com
VSecret.com
VitaJoy.com
WebCast.com
WebChat.com
WinGuru.com
WinTrip.com
WokInfo.com
WordDNA.com
WorkMap.com

AgileTax.com
AgriCard.com
AirTruth.com
AllBirds.com
AllGenes.com
AppCloud.com
AppStorm.com
BackDocs.com
BasePack.com
BattleTV.com
BetSmart.com
BetaFund.com
BikeBarn.com
BikeLine.com
BioMatic.com
BioWorld.com
BodyBlue.com
BodyShop.com
BoldLook.com
BuySight.com
ChatHelp.com
CheapFly.com
CitySeek.com
ClickTax.com
CodeGear.com
CodeGirl.com
ColorPro.com
CoolTown.com
CoolTrip.com
CoreCell.com
CropInfo.com
DNAStory.com
DailyHub.com
DairyDNA.com
DealTime.com
DevWorld.com
DocTimes.com
DogMovie.com
DriveWay.com
ECompany.com
EagleOne.com
EasyBags.com
EasyBank.com
EasyCars.com
EasyGold.com
EasyJobs.com
EmailPay.com
EtherBay.com
EvoLogic.com
FaceSpot.com
FairLoan.com
FairMail.com
FarmGear.com
FireRush.com
FixForce.com
FlowBank.com
FlowLook.com
FluxMesh.com
FoxWorld.com
FullMore.com
GameDrop.com
GearView.com
GiftHive.com
GoCourse.com
GoldCard.com
GoldSwan.com
GovCrush.com
GreyLock.com
HRCoding.com
HelloSum.com
HeyLight.com
HorseApp.com
HorseDNA.com
HydraAir.com
IVenture.com
IconPlus.com
InnoBook.com
InnoSure.com
InterMix.com
JobForce.com
JoyMaker.com
JuiceBox.com
LearnFit.com
LifeTech.com
LiveDots.com
LottoMax.com
LunaHelp.com
LunaSite.com
MCuisine.com
MailBear.com
MailKing.com
MailRank.com
MainSpot.com
MealDash.com
MedSmart.com
MediWell.com
MegaCars.com
MetaText.com
MintGift.com
MintLoan.com
MoneyNet.com
NameCops.com
NetSweet.com
NewScore.com
NewStorm.com
NewsCore.com
OpenRide.com
OpenTube.com
OurSpace.com
PayFirst.com
PetVille.com
PinkGlow.com
PlaySpot.com
PokerPay.com
PowerTax.com
ProClear.com
ProQuest.com
RawColor.com
ReEscrow.com
RockDrop.com
RockPort.com
SEOAlert.com
SafeSpot.com
SeaPilot.com
SeaScout.com
SearchHR.com
ShareBox.com
ShoeSite.com
SnapSpot.com
SnapTime.com
SoloSite.com
SunLotto.com
SwiftTax.com
TastyLab.com
TaxClick.com
TaxTalks.com
TaxVault.com
TaxWorks.com
TeaIndia.com
TechFeed.com
TeleShow.com
TheDaily.com
TheFight.com
TheStory.com
TimeLife.com
ToolMind.com
ToyMaker.com
TrueFirm.com
TrueHome.com
TwinLion.com
VAmerica.com
VCommand.com
VidaFeed.com
WeFamily.com
WeReview.com
WebBlock.com
WestHome.com
WestMail.com
WestNews.com
WinGuard.com
WinMania.com
WordWise.com
WorkDocs.com
WorkPlus.com
YogaGlow.com
YourDiet.com
 
Last edited:
13
•••
Anytime I come up with a creative name idea that I think is great I already know that someone somewhere has already thought of it and the .com is taken.

You simply cannot underestimate the collective creativity of 8 billion people over decades of time.

And, reversely, if you buy/register a good creative name, don't buy the BS that they need the brandable marketplace presentation to sell: probably someone will come up with the same and check it out (as long as it has good commercial application).

Just an example from the top of my head: during the mask-wearing era of the recent past, I thought it would be nice if the masks were not so bland and boring and carried some nice aroma (maybe even with aromatherapy). So I checked out aromask.com and, of course, whom I am kidding, registered since 2000.

Fast forward few years, and when I saw the name in the closeouts (how it even made it there?!) on days, I just snatched it. One of those names that are just nice business in a box.
 
Last edited:
10
•••
A number of valuable points made in this thread, both by the original poster and various people who have made comments.

I was going to mention Sten's article on the topic. @Jannes has already mentioned the most relevant, first part. Here is the link to both parts of the interview:
Sten makes a strong case that the key aspect of a name as a brand is that it be distinctive, and that an over-emphasis on search keyword metrics generally works against that. Sten brings a lot of credibility to his views, both due to evidence he presents, e.g. in corporate name choices, and also that he has for more than a year been the top domain name seller at SquadHelp.

The emphasis on keywords started in the very early stages of domain investing, even prior to giants like Rick Schwartz, Mike Mann, etc. when Gary Kremen and a few other name pioneers saw the Internet as replacing newspaper classified ads, and in that view, well before effective search, it was critical to have service and product match names.

It is somewhat surprising how much of domain investing remains in that mindset.

As others have pointed out, one issue with more creative names is that the pool of possibilities is very large (arguing against high worth) and that any particular creation may not appeal to many business owners (so STR will be less). Nevertheless, as in most things, more creativity is a good thing as we all move naming forward.

I think that main marketplaces will not work well for most creative brandables, and hence the brandable marketplaces were born. Fortunately, tools and metrics now make it easier to predict which names might be accepted at the marketplaces, and which have higher STR.

Brandable creations that include an anchor word that is likely to be searched probably have a better chance of being found on the big general purpose marketplaces.

I think it is good that different investors take different approaches.

It typically involves a lot of time to have a name 'win', but contests like those at SH provide a potential avenue for those who like to create names without building up an inventory of names that may never sell. It places the focus on a specific need, while still being open to a lot of creativity.

Thanks for the good points, everyone.

-Bob
 
Last edited:
8
•••
Fortunately, that doesn't happen on this forum :xf.grin:
Some of the creativity I have seen people talk about is not all that creative to me.

I saw something, so I registered some domain. Is that really creative?

I think in other fields like art, design, music, etc. creativity is more of an asset.

Sure, domains are all one of a kind. However, with domains there are several factors that separate the wheat from the chaff. It's not that hard to use metrics to determine what type of domains will get interest.

Brad
 
Last edited:
8
•••
This is not something new, unknown or that you personally discovered. Brandable markets (SH and BB) are filled with made up empty vessel type names. Branding agencies own made ups for clients.


Even good ones take 3 to 4 times as long to sell than domains that contain keywords. They are not in vogue right now. Sometimes they are chosen by buyers because they tend to be more inexpensive than keyword domains.

People like to buy what sells with more frequency. It has nothing to do with being creative or not.

Ultimately the buyer decides what is a good name and what is not. Most great made ups were registered long ago just like great standard names. And most sit unsold. Just like standard names.
 
6
•••
Nice sounding brands with zero meaning are not selling well, unless truly short and sweet. And there two main reasons for that:

a) brands that are meaningful in relation to what they do, get instant click with their customers. Basically, you might get 10%-50% more clicks, calls etc. just because people could connect your name to what your business actually does. Now why this happens is up to a debate. One possible explanation is that when people can guess the meaning of your name and find relevance they feel good about themselves. But I can think of few other reasons. Regardless, it is what it is. You can always go for completely "empty vessel" like Dasani for water, but then prepare your marketing "war chest" to turn it into a successful brand.

b) there are too many available options for nice sounding "empty vessel" names. There are nearly 12 million possible LLLLL combos, e.g. Probably couple of million of those are decent or half-decent. Now, if you go into 6 letter territory, you have over 300 million of those. Tens of millions of those could be ok or okayish. So, while the name you chose could very well been selected for a business if it were a hand-reg, they will probably pass when they have to pay $xxxx for it and just go to the next available option.

Now, I am a big fan of meaningful creative brands, but here is the thing. As creative as you might be, the best creative options have already been thought of and registered/owned for some time. So, the better ones that are more likely to sell are available only via aftermarket.

Just looking at my recent buys, here are few that are nice and creative imo:

Aromask.com (aroma +mask)

Sowks.com (Could be a play of soaks, but apparently, SOWK is often used in as short for Social Work, so by extension, Sowks = Social Works).

Cristl.com (Crystal)

Ultrafinity.com (ultra+infinity)

Breadista.com (bread barista)

KneadToGo.com (sounds like need to go, awesome for bread, dough, yeast to go products)

Nouera.com (new era?

TheFYT.com (The Fit?)

Greenitecture.com (Green + Architecture)

FinFormative.com (Fin Formative or F Informative, great for financial info)

Suprior.com (Super -> Superior, Supra -> Suprior)

Sylish.com (basically, don't we often say Sylish for Stylish?)

DuckAndCluck.com (a duck and a chicken)

Broadwand.com (Magic Wand for Broadband services)

Glossamer.com (Gloss +Gossamer)

Cyperior.com (Cyber + Superior)
 
6
•••
Imo... Businesses lack creativity in coming up with a brand to set them apart. They all want a keyword, then slap whatever fits their niche next to it to get their domain.

So its not just domainers being lazy, they're just following the money.

That being said, OP is kinda right. I am always on the lookout for unconventional names, they make great brands and will sell if you get your expectations right.

May not be millions but mid $xxx is kinda ok on a hand reg.
Kinda of a catch 22, though... If it's a great brand name, it should already be in use by several companies, in which case it's unlikely to be available as a hand reg. If it's available, it's usually because no one has thought (or wanted) to use the name... which makes it a lot harder to sell.

Mid $XXX may seem good on a $12 investment, but when you consider that good domain portfolios sell about 1-2% of their names per year on average, you actually need to be aiming for a $1,000 sale on hand reg names in order to at least break even in the long run.
 
6
•••
Kinda of a catch 22, though... If it's a great brand name, it should already be in use by several companies, in which case it's unlikely to be available as a hand reg. If it's available, it's usually because no one has thought (or wanted) to use the name... which makes it a lot harder to sell.

Mid $XXX may seem good on a $12 investment, but when you consider that good domain portfolios sell about 1-2% of their names per year on average, you actually need to be aiming for a $1,000 sale on hand reg names in order to at least break even in the long run.

"Great" can be quite subjective. Gotta look for "decent" or "ok" names and market them as being just that and keep your STR up.

It takes time, it takes effort though.

Gotta balance out your portfolio as well. Good mix of liquids, oneworders. Com net org and matured cctlds.

Regarding the STR... Lower tier portfolios definitely need a much higher STR than that 1-2%, if you've got the skills to pull it off.

Just saying, don't get fooled by what people sell domains for, look at the bottom line. If you net 100K a year and are able to repeat that , it doesn't matter what you sell, how many you sell. Profit is what's counting.

That being said, I do agree with you but for those lacking funds to invest in top dollar names, there's another path to walk if you take the time to study, watch and educate yourself. Get creative.
 
6
•••
I have seen this type of comment about creativity many times.

In my view being "creative" can actually be a detriment when it comes to domain investing.

When it comes to domain investing you really want a large pool of potential buyers. It is just playing the odds.

Anyone can make up creative brands, puns, etc. Domains are unlikely to sell if there is a tiny or non-existent pool of potential buyers.

Brad
 
5
•••
Could be a great opportunity to compare and contrast strategies and things to look for when hand registering. I also find names worth registering now and then. Although, I do tend to focus on keywords. But even more than that, I heavily base my decisions on favourable search engine results for the exact term (with some occasional personal bias thrown in).

Here are three names I registered recently (found on the deleted lists) and my rationale for the purchases:

Pro/Vitre (com) - A couple exisitng businesses and/or active sites already using this name. "Vitre" is a French translation of the word "window". "Pro" is always solid for branding, and is used in French as well as English.

Mystic/Isles (com) - I'm a bit of a fantasy geek, so I admit some personal bias with this reg. It's the name of an existing online game, but just sounds great to my ear for any fantasy use. Similar to Black Isle entertainment, or Mystic Games, these are two words that just pair really well for this purpose.

Restored/Antiques (com) - Solid example of a keyword domain. Nice and generic, but specific enough to be useful and relevant for a lot of existing online businesses.

These are the types of names I look for when hand registering. Each one offers a decent opportunity to 100x your investment or better (and unless you're actively peddling and moving a lot of names, 100x should be your minimum profit target).

I do enjoy invented brand names quite a bit, and I own several. But I always like to ensure at least one of two things before buying one:
  • Inclusion of a solid keyword (or obvious combination of two); or
  • Evidence of the name being used by other businesses for marketing, branding, or product/service-naming purposes
 
Last edited:
4
•••
Imo... Businesses lack creativity in coming up with a brand to set them apart. They all want a keyword, then slap whatever fits their niche next to it to get their domain.

So its not just domainers being lazy, they're just following the money.

That being said, OP is kinda right. I am always on the lookout for unconventional names, they make great brands and will sell if you get your expectations right.

May not be millions but mid $xxx is kinda ok on a hand reg.
 
4
•••
May not be millions but mid $xxx is kinda ok on a hand reg.

The math does not work out if you hand reg at $10 and sell for $500 @ 1-2%.

You'll breakeven at best and more likely lose money.

"Creativity" and "making money as a domain investor" rarely go hand in hand.

There are exceptions such as Sten who have a knack for coming up with names that will sell. But most people don't have this skillset. Just look at all the names for sale here on the forum. 99% are complete garbage.

Focus on keywords that business owners consistently use to name their businesses and you will do well.
 
4
•••
All of the following domains have MarkMonitor nameservers.

Which of these domains are considered "creative"?
Wow, that is some list and it would take a hell of a lot of time to break it down by my own criteria. After a quick view and a few stops along the way, I would estimate that around 90% could be considered 'Creative' by wording, many will be border-line. (that doesn't mean I consider all of them to be Good)

Creative to my mind equals Not specifically designed or worded to Pigeon-hole its use. Therefore it's capable of multiple interpretations within boundaries. However, It should stand the test of being assigned a Specific interpretation when in use./active business/live website.

This is just a short answer, I will need to give you examples which would help define. Hopefully I'll find some time later to give you a better interpretation. There remains a big gulf between good and poor creativity.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
One does not simply trademark descriptive 'keyword' domains. Trademarks cannot be descriptive.

But trademarks are important in corporate warfare. Creates a defensible moat. So you look for catchy, short, trademark-able names. Maybe, made-up. Maybe, portmanteau. Maybe single letters!

Short, catchy names like X.com describe nothing and yet once you hear it you won't forget it. BUT short catchy names are fraught with fire swamps. Your brilliant idea has already been done. A lot. You need Musk level $$ to fight your way out. According to National Law Review, X.com was hit last year with the inevitable infringement suit. No idea how that turned out but X.com is still running so ...

Which brings us back to non trademark-able descriptive keyword domains. They are safe. They won't violate anyone's trademark. They are blue collar work horses. Folks can find you, no problem.

A good strategy for us peasants is to start our business on a low cost descriptive domain and gradually switch to a more 'spensive branded name as you get your money wheels and advertising going.

Maybe Musk should have gone with the drab sounding, beige colored ... SocialMedia.com

Both types of domains are needed. Trademark-able names have a much smaller market.
 
4
•••
On another note, it seems that some feel you're an exception in being able to come up with catchy names and that your results aren't replicable. What's your view?
I have rethought my earlier answer about coming back to re-examine the list and explain what may be deemed 'Creative' You can pick the bones out of the concept but you can never fully dissect it.

Lets start with the major flaws for many when applied to Western values, that of education, culture, language, concepts, precepts . You can't escape them. One of the early lessons of working in merchandising was understanding what doesn't work. I never had to go there in display building purely because I could visualise the conflicts or negative elements. Am I looking for contrast and depth, Blend and transformation. Flow and direction.

Unlike art, your never working with a totally blank piece of canvas. Your word toolbox is massive but individual components sit in relationship with each other. Not dissimilar to a musical instrument. The skills are certainly transferrable.

Personal backgrounds are a key element in most conceptual ideals and models. My good fortune was starting off as a college trained French chef before moving into Retail Sales and then marketing and merchandising. I love creativity but you have to learn how to rule-out 99% of ideas from the beginning. Possibly move 1% to paper for refinement (That refinement stage is the real work)

I get quite a lot of ideas from other peoples, what I would call shots-in-the-dark, great idea totally unrefined.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
I am all for thinking outside the box, but what is the use in being creative if you only come up with bad ideas? :ROFL:
Fortunately, that doesn't happen on this forum :xf.grin:
 
4
•••
I also can hand reg many brandables daily in COM ext, but one should question why they are available to hand reg!?
The one way to possible successfully sell domains is to predict the future or squatt new emerging niches, like when Elon Musk said he releases Grok, Mark Zuckerberg Llama, Openai ChatGPT and other similar examples, inventing new brands can take years to sell but if you have the resources and patience it can be a fruitful endeavour.
 
3
•••
Imo... Businesses lack creativity in coming up with a brand to set them apart. They all want a keyword, then slap whatever fits their niche next to it to get their domain.
Indeed, But quite often these businesses are flexible with their Keyword, providing it fits within their category rather than specific niche. This gives the creative quite a bit of leeway in bringing a bit of word-art to the table.

Making sure it shows-up within their keyword searches on the sales sites is key to getting it noticed in the first place
 
Last edited:
3
•••
You are right, the world is not black and not white, it is gray. 99% of people are also a gray mass. They need to eat well, sleep well, have great sex and earn a lot of money. Many of my colleagues here said wise words: if you are ready to lose money, you can experiment with creativity. The moral here is simple - now you are at domainer forum, where the laws of activity are simple - buy cheaper, sell more expensive. This is also science. You need to know what exactly to buy. Need Knowledge and Experience. You offer a creative approach. And I welcome it. Because I myself do it. I like to inhale the life into dead verbal constructions. When I was just a start of domaining I sincerely did not understand why interesting word structures were not interested in anyone. For example Keen+Insurance=KeensuranceLLLL, Aroma+Mango=AromangoLLLL, Olymp+Empire=OlympireLLLL(was sold for $2,549, you may visit this site to see new brand, that never was before), It was a very exciting activity, since I created the unique names of brands from scratch, but this play of words does not bring much money. The maximum I received $ 3300 (but I did not fall less than $ 2000). This is also a good result, given that I have spent no more than $10 for registration. But I need to move on. Therefore, I began to buy LLLL.com domains to improve my portfolio. I didn't want to do this. This iwas necessary. Imagine you walk along the street; On the left is a large supermarket, and a small shop on the right. To buy home products, you will choose a supermarket where there is a large selection. Your portfolio should become such a supermarket of high -quality domains for all occasions. You need to combine your creativity and trading experience.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
I have a few made up names bought this year and live on Afternic and i must say that it's not all smokes and mirrors as it might seem,

There's a boom into new online startups and websites which are on the lookout for new Brandable names and it doesn't always have to be a dictionary word,

few of my names are <8 Letters, 2-3 syllables max and have gotten offers too which i declined cause it didn't line up with what i was looking for it,

But as an veteran once told me, you already have a good name when you know someone wants it for some $$$, and that should be considered a win in itself.

I would really suggest you to go through some guides out there which suggest how to compe up with made up names and you will be surprised too when you get your first offer for such a name, I hope you make it and keep going.... don't lose hope.
 
3
•••
Nice domain @bmugford

So, the essential question now is: does creativity equals uniqueness?

This is a question only AI can solve.

The question of whether creativity equals uniqueness is an intriguing one. Let’s delve into it:
  1. Creativity:
    • Creativity involves the ability to generate novel ideas, solutions, or expressions. It’s the spark that ignites innovation and drives artistic endeavors.
    • When you’re creative, you engage in thinking that transcends the ordinary, leading to fresh perspectives and original concepts.
  2. Uniqueness:
    • Uniqueness refers to something being one of a kind, distinct, or unparalleled.
    • A unique creation stands out from the crowd, defying conventions and leaving an indelible mark.
  3. The Intersection:
    • Creativity and uniqueness intersect but are not synonymous.
    • Creativity can lead to uniqueness, but not all creative ideas or works are inherently unique.
    • Uniqueness often emerges when creative ideas are executed in a way that sets them apart from existing norms.
  4. Value:
    • When you’re creative, the outcome holds value for someone—whether it’s a piece of art, a technological innovation, or a novel solution.
    • Uniqueness adds value by capturing attention, sparking curiosity, and leaving a lasting impression.
  5. Examples:
    • A unique painting may emerge from a creative artist’s vision, blending colors and forms in an unprecedented way.
    • A creative marketing campaign can be unique if it breaks away from clichés and resonates with the audience.
  6. Conclusion:
    • While creativity and uniqueness are intertwined, they don’t always go hand in hand.
    • Being creative doesn’t automatically guarantee uniqueness, but it opens the door to exploration and the possibility of creating something truly exceptional.
In the end, perhaps it’s the pursuit of creativity that fuels the quest for uniqueness—a journey where imagination meets originality.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Not just "big finance investor (whatever that is? Perhaps you mean someone who has lots of money to invest in domain names?).

"Safe" may appeal to you, but it is not where the most value lies, as Sten wrote. Dictionary words as domains can also hinder a name's value, unless you get lucky, like booking.com, fabulous.com, amazon.com, etc., (but those 3 names can be used for anything so they have no inherent value as brands in and of themselves).
True, Amazon is enormous but colossal companies have gone bust before and will do so in the future (Mr Bezos said this some time ago about his company).

But also, dictionary words are pursued by a large number of people and they are often impossible to acquire unless you buy them in the open market, IF they become available and IF you can afford the hefty price, say upwards of $xxx,xxx.

Also, brand-able names are not new. They have been in existence since the start of the internet so almost 40 years. Plus, as useful/usable/brand-able names become less and less available, the value of some of those names that have been registered will rise.

Of course, if you gave me a choice of diamond.com or fiverr.com for free, I would have to be an idiot to say "Give me fiverr.com", because we are in the business of economics and the only reason all of us do not got and buy diamond.com is because we don't have $10 million to spend. So its really, a silly question, I think.

I understand that you have the views you have and that you want to pursue domain names in the way you do. There is nothing inherently wrong with that.
I am just pointing out that there is an easier way to find value in domain names, if domainers would use some creativity and invest some time, to formulate brand-able names, rather than just relying on keywords.

There are lots of possible unregistered brand-able names available, just waiting for someone's mind to bring them into existence.
This is a difficult discussion to have without examples.

You say you register names that no one has ever thought of, meaning they have never been registered. I find it hard to believe that you regularly sell names that have never been owned/registered by anyone else, and that do not contain any keywords.

Are you able to provide examples from your portfolio to help frame the discussion? Like, ten of your favourite names?
 
Last edited:
2
•••
It seems to me that there is a lack of creativity in domain name creation.

I sense that there is a fixation/obsession with keywords so that the domain will appeal to Google, a private company that is an effective monopoly and seems to do whatever it likes. Remember when Google were upstarts and said “Don’t be evil” - well, they have become what they once despised.
This happens with many challengers to the status quo, in that once they begin to grow, they can soon become the status quo and act in ways that they used to criticize/despise others. Apple is another such company, and as much as I like their products (except their poor Mail program), approaching $3 trillion in revenue hampers your ability to being a challenger, an innovator, fresh.
Perhaps if Steve and Jony were still there, Apple could still have those attributes.

But I digress.

I haven’t ever focused on creating domains based on keywords. It just seems that the keyword space is so overcrowded that getting noticed becomes harder and harder over time. I also don’t really understand this space, having not explored it and I also take exception to being at the mercy of the evil G, who behave as judge, jury & executioner, to say the least of their antics.

Looking at the some of the recently created internet companies (last 15 years or so), there are many two word company names made up of dictionary words, but a good number are names that are not real words and their names are just made up.
This is the area I have focused on for the past 10+ years and I have been surprised at how many names have been available that I have come up with. Over the last few years, I have added over 200 names to my portfolio and I am coming up with name ideas all the time. Although not all my name ideas become names I register.

I don’t expect many of my names to appeal to lots of people or that they will sell for eyebrow raising amounts. But like all seller/buyer scenarios, it only takes one person to like a name I have created and like it enough to want to buy it. Given the population of internet users, which is always growing and that useful domain names are becoming increasingly rarer, I think that won’t be hard to achieve.

I usually come up with names by something I see or hear, sometimes swapping letters around or adding 1-2 letters, sometimes replacing letters. I have also “discovered” names, serendipitously, by making typos when I’ve been typing something, like an email or a url. It is surprising to me how often this happens and I am stopped in my working flow. I pause for a while and think about what is on the screen. Sometimes, its nothing or really just junk, but sometimes it looks and sounds great to me.

Usually, I need to like how the domain sounds and if it passes the “radio test”. I also have to be able to see what market the name might address or appeal to and whether that market is immature/mature and/or overcrowded and/or populated by upstarts. Domain names are very low cost, but if you register many iffy names or names with fringe appeal, the costs add up.
I check the visitor figures for each of my domains as they are coming up for renewal and take a decision on whether to renew or let them expire. I don’t let many go.

I tend to focus on 5-8 letter domains (4 letter domains are almost all taken up, the worthwhile ones that is, but I don’t spend any time searching just for these), but I might go beyond 8 letters if the name sounds very good to me.

I do have some domains that are real words, including people’s names, but this is less than 5% of my portfolio.

If you have approached domain name creation in ways other than by using keywords, perhaps you’d like to share your method or comment on mine.
So I have figures out that this thread is made for who registers domain names just for hobby. We are domainers are strict to buy domain names for selling. Only keeping names those easily sold. Buy domain names with discount codes, and sale for profit. That is "creative" in our domaining. Creative in hobby just to have a fun spending money without thinking how much money will be used without any sale. Domaining for hobby is only for big financial domainers who enjoy wasting their money or newbie domainers who don't know what can be sold and trapped in dreaming rich fast Scheme.
 
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back