Dynadot โ€” .com Registration $8.99

domain ZitBusters.com Acne Site ?

Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

advaita

Established Member
Impact
55
I just regged ZitBusters.com which I thought might have potential as an acne treatment site - any thoughts/opinions ?
 
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Great name! I'm surprised it wasn't taken. Easily $1xx-$2xx for something that catchy. ZitZappers.com is gone unfortunately.
 
0
•••
Nice to see you agree - I thought it was pretty good too. I also thought of zitzappers too, and zitzap and zapzits. All gone.
 
0
•••
I have to say I am not a big "Brandable" fan, but this name is nice. It is Brandable in a sense that anyone would instantly know what the company offered.

$XXX+
 
0
•••
Fits the age group nicely as a little bit of a campy feel to it. Might be able to go after some of the big cream companies and see if they could use it for marketing campaign. Could generate $XXXX. Otherwise, good for $250 or so. Develop it yourself. Might be able to make some $ on it. GOod luck
 
0
•••
yes a great sounding name .......good luck
 
0
•••
Thanks for the encouragement guys - you have dynamized me to try and contact acne treatment manufacturers etc... - hopefully I will get some decent offers
 
0
•••
darn, if this is handregged then its a very nice catch, how come nobody have this regged? very catchy and brandable, probably low - mid $xxx for me for the domain alone
 
0
•••
Yup SC it was handregged 2 days ago - I was just going through the possibilites for acne sites and was surprised myself when it said the .com was still available - so I guess that mans there must be other decent .coms still avaialble
 
0
•••
This just goes to show that many treasures are still out there for hand regging.

I estimate this at a great price for end user aka: zit busting medicine, if traffic flows & you find the right buyer, the price is in the eye of the buyer.
 
0
•••
Goes to show, there are still some good names yet to be discovered...
or rediscovered, whatever the case may be.
.
 
0
•••
dunno about value but its very catchy
 
0
•••
I will be putting together a letter and e-mailing it to potential end users/buyers early next week so I will let you know how things work out - I think it is a good brandable name for a site or an advertising campaign
 
0
•••
It's interesting

I'm not as high on the name though and here is why. To me, the plural implies that it's a company rather than a product. I'd much rather see the non-plural name.

I don't see any acne related company calling themselves that but it would probably have appeal towards the teens themselves.

I'd say low to mid XX for resale. Throw it up on whypark with acne related news and notes and see if you can get it indexed. I'm quite sure there will be no traffic with SEO.
 
0
•••
great name
$50 - $100 as is

I have a similiar name which does well (Popacne.com)
 
0
•••
Love the name. I'd put it higher than most here. Mid to high $xxx via end user is easily attainable. FatBusters.com sold for $20,000 last year, and I'd say your two words are even more relevant to their purpose. Good luck.
 
0
•••
Thanks for the comments - needless to say I agree with Afflucky and the $20,000 paid for fatbusters. That is the sort of price I was thinking of. Although strangely the fatbusters site has nothing to do with dieting. As for singular or plural I prefer the plural just because of it the fact it is the same as Ghostbusters and I see it as more of a campaign /concept than an actual product.
 
0
•••
Given the prevalence of ZipCodes in the US - I just registered ZitCode.com too - I figured it also has possibilities for an advertising concept /campaign for a skin care company
 
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dynadot โ€” .com Registration $8.99Dynadot โ€” .com Registration $8.99
Appraise.net
Unstoppable Domains
Domain Recover
DomainEasy โ€” Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back